Resurrection

Luke 20:35–36: “Those who have been counted worthy of gaining that system of things and the resurrection from the dead neither marry nor are given in marriage. In fact, they cannot die anymore, for they are like the angels.”

Matthew 27:51–53:"And look! the curtain of the sanctuary was torn in two, from top to bottom, and the earth quaked, and the rocks were split. And the tombs were opened, and many bodies of the holy ones who had fallen asleep were raised up  (and people coming out from among the tombs after his being raised up entered into the holy city), and they became visible to many people. But when the army officer and those with him keeping watch over Jesus saw the earthquake and the things happening, they grew very much afraid and said: “Certainly this was God’s Son.”

Resurrection — Chapters Overview

Chapter 1 — How Are the Dead to Be Raised Up?

This chapter introduces the Bible’s answer to Paul’s question: How are the dead raised, and with what sort of body do they return? Beginning with a simple reflection on creation from dust, it explores how Jehovah can restore not only physical life but the full identity of a person—memory, character, and inner life. The chapter shows that Scripture speaks of resurrection in more than one sense: a future, literal resurrection of the dead, and a spiritual awakening that can begin now in those who respond to Christ. Together, these themes establish the foundation for the book’s unfolding view of resurrection as restoration, continuity, and divine remembrance.

Chapter 2 — The Day the Dead Awoke: Matthew’s Hidden Revelation

Explores Matthew’s unique account of opened tombs and “holy ones raised,” showing how this brief passage functions as a prophetic revelation rather than a literal resurrection report. Read through a Hebrew lens, it introduces resurrection as an awakening and unveiling that coincides with the Messiah’s death and prepares the reader for a deeper, layered understanding of resurrection throughout the Gospels.

Chapter 3 — When the Risen Christ Drew Near: The Mystery of His Many Appearances

Examines Jesus’ post-resurrection appearances, showing why he revealed himself in different forms to different people. Rather than dramatic displays, these encounters awakened faith, removed fear, and restored hearts—demonstrating that resurrection power was already at work in the living.

Chapter 4 — Matthew: The Gospel Written for Hebrew Ears

Explains why Matthew alone records the awakening of the “holy ones” at Jesus’ death. By showing that Matthew wrote for a Hebrew audience steeped in prophetic language, this chapter reveals how resurrection imagery in his Gospel points to spiritual awakening and covenant renewal rather than literal spectacle.

Chapter 5 — Ancient and Modern Translations as Witnesses to Matthew’s Prophetic Language (Matthew 27:52, 53)

Examines how the Greek text and early translations of Matthew 27:52–53 preserve prophetic, awakening language rather than forcing a literal reading. By comparing ancient versions and modern translations, this chapter shows that Matthew’s wording naturally allows a symbolic understanding of spiritual resurrection and prepares the ground for its connection with later resurrection imagery in Revelation.

Clarifies how judgment relates to resurrection, emphasizing accountability and restoration rather than punishment.

Chapter 6 — Opened Tombs and Opened Hearts — Matthew 27:52, 53 in Light of Spiritual Resurrection (Jehovah’s Witnesses Perspective)

Reviews how Jehovah’s Witnesses have consistently understood Matthew 27:52–53 as involving opened tombs, not a resurrection, while also highlighting the Bible’s established pattern of spiritual revival. Drawing on Watchtower publications and prophetic parallels, this chapter reflects on how the disciples’ awakening after Jesus’ resurrection fits a broader scriptural pattern of hearts being raised from spiritual death—without claiming doctrinal authority.

Chapter 7 — The Prophetic Language of Awakening: How the Scriptures Prepare Us for Matthew’s Vision

Shows how the Hebrew Scriptures consistently use resurrection language to describe awakening, restoration, and spiritual revival. By tracing this prophetic vocabulary through Daniel, Isaiah, Ezekiel, Jesus’ teachings, and Paul’s writings, this chapter prepares the reader to understand Matthew’s vision as part of a long-established biblical pattern in which resurrection begins in the heart before it is fulfilled physically.

Chapter 8 — The Sadducees’ Confusion: No Distinction Between Spiritual and Physical

Examines why the Sadducees rejected the resurrection by reducing it to a mere continuation of physical life. By tracing Jesus’ reply through Moses, the Prophets, and the apostles, this chapter clarifies the biblical distinction between spiritual resurrection that begins in the heart and the future physical resurrection, showing how Matthew’s language fits this ordered pattern.

Chapter 9 — The Three Spheres of Jehovah’s Temple and the Opening of the Heart

Explains how Jehovah’s spiritual temple operates on three interconnected levels—heavenly, congregational, and personal—and how Christ’s death opens access across all three. This chapter shows how spiritual life flows from Jehovah, through Christ’s presence among the congregations, and finally into the individual heart, where the inner veil is torn and true worship takes root.

Chapter 10 — Linguistic Framework of Heart, Stone, Tomb, Altar, Temple, and Kingdom

Develops a unified biblical vocabulary linking heart, stone, tomb, altar, temple, and Kingdom across the Hebrew Scriptures and the Christian Greek Scriptures. By tracing how stone functions as resistance, witness, foundation, and finally life-bearing structure, this chapter shows how resurrection language consistently refers to restored responsiveness rather than mere relocation of bodies. It explains how external worship arrangements—altars and temples—prepared for, but could not accomplish, inner transformation. The chapter concludes by showing how Christ and Jehovah’s Kingdom fulfill these patterns, turning silent stone into living, responsive worship.

Chapter 11 — From Opened Tombs to Opened Mouths: Matthew and Acts in One Continuous Story

Shows how Matthew’s brief resurrection imagery finds its historical explanation in the book of Acts. This chapter connects Matthew’s prophetic language of “holy ones becoming visible” with Luke’s detailed record of public preaching, courageous testimony, and transformed lives in Jerusalem. It demonstrates that resurrection power first manifested not through spectacle, but through awakened voices and visible faith. Together, Matthew and Acts present one continuous story of resurrection unfolding from inner awakening to public witness.

Chapter 12 — From Stone Heart to Living Stone: The Resurrection of the Inner Sanctuary

Traces the biblical transformation of the human heart from stone-like deadness to living participation in Jehovah’s spiritual temple. Drawing from the prophets, Jesus’ teachings, and the apostles, this chapter shows how spiritual resurrection removes the heart of stone, opens the inner sanctuary, and restores responsiveness to God. It explains how Christ’s death and resurrection initiate this inner transformation, culminating in believers becoming “living stones” built upon Christ himself. The chapter presents spiritual resurrection as the renewal of the heart that makes true worship possible.

Chapter 13 — Resurrection as Awakening: How Life Returned to the Living

Shows how the resurrection of Jesus is presented in Scripture as an awakening that first restores the living before it restores the dead. By weaving together Matthew’s prophetic imagery, Luke’s historical record, John’s relational encounters, Paul’s sequential teaching, and Revelation’s heavenly perspective, this chapter presents resurrection as a continuous work unfolding in stages. It explains how resurrection power initially opens hearts, restores testimony, and defeats death’s authority long before physical resurrection is completed. The chapter concludes by showing resurrection as life restored and perfected, not merely repeated after interruption.

Chapter 14 — The Vineyard of the Heart: Preparing the Inner Garden for Jehovah

Explores the biblical image of the heart as Jehovah’s vineyard—cleared, cultivated, guarded, and lovingly prepared for spiritual growth. Drawing from Isaiah, the Song of Songs, Jesus’ parables, and the apostles, this chapter shows how Jehovah removes inner obstacles, assigns formative responsibilities, and trains devotion through service. It explains how tending the “vineyards of others” prepares believers to guard their own inner sanctuary as a locked garden for God. The chapter concludes by uniting vineyard and temple imagery, showing how a cultivated heart becomes a dwelling place for Jehovah and a living stone in His house.

Chapter 15 — Jesus the Gardener of the New Creation

Explores the significance of Jesus appearing as a gardener after his resurrection, revealing his role as the initiator of the new creation within the human heart. This chapter shows how Christ tends, heals, and prepares hearts long before entrusting believers with responsibility for their own spiritual growth. It emphasizes that resurrection begins as inner restoration—softening, nurturing, and awakening—before any future physical resurrection occurs. Jesus is presented as the patient and skilled Gardener who prepares the soil before expecting fruit.

Chapter 16 — The Gardener Removes the Fear of Punishment

Shows how viewing Jesus as the Gardener of the new creation transforms the believer’s understanding of judgment, discipline, and fear. This chapter explains that Christ’s work is restorative rather than punitive, replacing images of torment with cultivation, protection, and healing. By tracing biblical gardening imagery, it demonstrates why fear of divine punishment dissolves when God is understood as Father, Jesus as Gardener, and the heart as soil under loving care. The result is trust, security, and confidence in Jehovah’s purpose to restore life, not destroy it.

Chapter 17 — Soil at the Edge of the Flame: Jesus’ Warning to the Unfruitful

Examines Jesus’ warnings about fire, pruning, and removal within their agricultural and prophetic context. This chapter shows that biblical “fire” consistently represents cleansing, removal, and discipline—not eternal torment—and aligns fully with Jehovah’s Witness understanding of judgment. By reading Jesus’ words through vineyard imagery, it explains that what is burned is unfruitfulness, not the person Jehovah desires to save. The Gardener’s purpose remains restoration, preparing the soil for renewed growth and future fruitfulness.

Chapter 18 — The Rich Man in the Fire: A Parable of Spiritual Awakening, Not Literal Torment

Clarifies Jesus’ illustration of the rich man and Lazarus by placing it firmly within its symbolic, prophetic, and historical context. This chapter shows that the parable describes a reversal of spiritual conditions during Jesus’ ministry, not conscious torment after death, fully harmonizing with the New World Translation and Jehovah’s Witness understanding of the state of the dead. The “fire” represents anguish from loss of divine favor, while Abraham’s bosom signifies acceptance and covenant standing. Seen through the lens of Jesus as the Gardener, the parable reveals judgment as exposure and separation—not punishment—and awakening as the true theme of the account.

Chapter 19 — “Fear the One Who Can Destroy Body and Soul in Gehenna” — What Did Jesus Really Mean?

Examines Jesus’ warning in Matthew 10:28 by restoring its original meaning through the lens of Gehenna, the Hebrew understanding of the soul, and the consistent teaching of Jehovah’s Witnesses regarding death and judgment. This chapter shows that Jesus was not threatening eternal torment, but emphasizing Jehovah’s unique authority to bring about complete and irreversible destruction of life. Gehenna is revealed as a symbol of total removal, not conscious suffering, harmonizing with Jesus’ role as the Gardener who removes what cannot bear fruit. The warning ultimately redirects fear away from humans and toward maintaining a responsive, living relationship with Jehovah.

Chapter 20 — The Heavens and the Earth Reserved for Fire — Peter’s Vision of Cleansing, Not Torment

Explains Peter’s words in 2 Peter 3 by restoring their prophetic meaning, showing that “heavens” and “earth” refer to human rulership and society, not the literal sky and planet. This chapter demonstrates that the “fire” Peter describes is symbolic of divine judgment and cleansing—removing corrupt systems and ungodly people—just as the Flood removed a wicked world without destroying the earth itself. By comparing Peter’s language with the Hebrew prophets and Jesus’ teachings, it reveals a consistent biblical pattern of removal and renewal, not torment. The chapter concludes by showing how this cleansing prepares the way for the new heavens and new earth in which righteousness will dwell.

Chapter 21 — The Kingdom, Sonship, and the Inhabited Earth to Come

Unifies resurrection, Kingdom rule, and Hebrews’ statement that the coming inhabited earth is subjected not to angels but to restored human sons, showing how the Kingdom fulfills its purpose and returns authority to Jehovah.

How This Study Is Intended to Be Read

These chapters are not independent essays.
They are progressive steps—moving from awakening, to identity, to sonship, and finally to Jehovah’s completed purpose.

Chapter 1

How Are the Dead to Be Raised Up?

A Note on Resurrection, Purpose, and Form

The Bible does not present resurrection as a single mechanical process or a single form of restored life. Instead, it reveals resurrection as a work of Jehovah carried out in harmony with His purpose, His timing, and His wisdom.

Jehovah’s original purpose for the earth and for mankind has never changed. Humans were created to live in physical bodies on the earth, to cultivate it, care for it, and reflect Jehovah’s qualities within creation. Nothing in Scripture indicates that this purpose has been abandoned, spiritualized away, or transferred permanently to another realm.

At the same time, the Scriptures acknowledge a resurrection to heavenly life for a limited number in union with Christ. While the Bible clearly affirms this calling and its role within Jehovah’s arrangement, it does not fully define the nature, timing, or future interaction of such heavenly embodiment beyond what is necessary for faith. Where Scripture is silent, this discussion avoids speculation and remains respectful of what has not been revealed.

Accordingly, this page approaches resurrection as a unified divine work that unfolds in stages: it begins with spiritual awakening through hearing and responding to God’s voice, is preserved through Jehovah’s perfect memory, and is completed when life is fully restored in the form Jehovah chooses—always in harmony with His unchanging purpose for the earth and for humankind.

Nevertheless, someone will say:

“How are the dead to be raised up?

Yes, with what sort of body are they coming?”

Even though the apostle Paul refers to both heavenly bodies and earthly bodies in his answer, his focus is not on prescribing the mechanics or permanent form of resurrection. Rather, he is showing that Jehovah already grants different kinds of bodies according to purpose. When Paul speaks of a “spiritual body,” he does not define it as necessarily heavenly in nature, nor does he require discussion beyond what Scripture reveals. Where Paul stops, this discussion also stops—content to trust that Jehovah gives to each one “a body just as it has pleased him."

Scripture consistently encourages believers to become spiritual persons, guided and shaped by God’s spirit. It does not speak of becoming “heavenly persons” as a general goal. This distinction helps clarify Paul’s language: when he speaks of a “spiritual body,” he is describing a body fully directed by spirit—not necessarily one located in heaven.

The discussion that follows focuses primarily on the spiritual aspect of resurrection—the awakening that begins when a person hears and responds to the voice of the Son of God, and the inner renewal that Jehovah preserves in His perfect memory.

This emphasis does not replace the future, literal resurrection promised in the Scriptures, nor does it redefine Jehovah’s purpose for mankind to live on a restored earth. Rather, it helps us dwell on the foundational work of resurrection that begins now: the formation of a spiritual person, responsive to God, whose identity Jehovah remembers and later restores in the manner and form He chooses.

Resurrection as Restoration: From Dust, Memory, and Identity to Life Again

My faith in the resurrection began with my mother’s simple explanation: “We are all made from dust—atoms and molecules of the earth. If these elements were once organized into our bodies, giving us the ability to think, feel, and connect with the world around us, then the miracle of restoring that life again in the resurrection is no greater than the miracle of creating it the first time.”

Still, creating a physical copy is one thing; restoring the inner person—the character, feelings, memories, and the full pattern of who we are—seems far more complex. Thirty years ago, this thought would have puzzled me far more than it does today. But now, seeing how computers can store not just data but the unique “spirit” of a person’s digital life, it no longer feels unimaginable that every detail of a personality could be preserved perfectly. Jesus himself was the living demonstration of what it means for a spirit being to inhabit a human body, and then return to spirit life again. For those without faith, such a transformation is difficult to comprehend, yet it stands as a powerful example of Jehovah’s ability to restore life in all its fullness.

Of course, seeing this truth confirmed in the Bible gave it even greater value. My first Bible translation often emphasized life after death as something existing beyond the physical realm. Nevertheless, there are plenty of scriptures that are hard to ignore—passages that clearly point to a physical resurrection.

As I continued studying, I discovered that the Bible does not merely speak about a spiritual continuation of life but clearly promises a resurrection to physical life on earth. What had begun as a comforting idea gradually became a solid conviction, supported by many Scriptures. These verses confirmed that Jehovah’s purpose for mankind has always been life in a real, tangible body, lived on a restored earth filled with beauty and peace.

Yet something else emerged as I kept reading. These resurrection texts often carry more than one layer of meaning. First, they describe a literal resurrection of the dead. But when viewed through the rest of Jesus’ teachings, they also reflect the spiritual resurrection that takes place in the hearts of those who are physically alive—people who “hear the voice of the Son of God and live,” even now.

Then I learned another truth:
the physical body comes first, inherited through Adam and therefore subject to sin and death;
but the symbolic resurrection must come next, the moment a person “passes from death to life” by responding to Christ.

Finally will come the literal resurrection of those who have died—yet even they will still need spiritual awakening during the Thousand Year Reign to grow into perfection under Kingdom rule.

With these thoughts in mind, the Scriptures below took on a much deeper meaning.
You will likely feel the same progression:

first, the powerful promise of literal resurrection,
then, the spiritual resurrection of living humans,
and finally, the unified pattern—physical life restored, followed by spiritual renewal.

Read the following verses and see how you feel as both aspects of resurrection begin to stand out:

Jehovah’s Original Purpose and Promise

Genesis 2:7 – “Jehovah God formed the man out of dust from the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living person.”
Genesis 3:19 – “For dust you are and to dust you will return.”
Job 14:13–15 – “You will call, and I will answer you. You will long for the work of your hands.”
Psalm 37:9–11, 29 – “The righteous will possess the earth, and they will live forever on it.”
Isaiah 25:8 – “He will swallow up death forever.”
Isaiah 26:19 – “Your dead will live. My corpses will rise up. Awake and cry out joyfully, you residents in the dust!”
Ezekiel 37:12–14 – “I will open your graves and bring you up out of your graves, my people.”

Resurrection in Jesus’ Teachings

Matthew 5:5 – “Happy are the mild-tempered, since they will inherit the earth.”
John 5:28–29 – “All those in the memorial tombs will hear his voice and come out.”
John 6:39–40 – “I will resurrect him on the last day.”
John 11:23–25 – Jesus said to Martha, “Your brother will rise.”
John 11:43–44 – Jesus called, “Lazarus, come out!” and he came out alive in a physical body.
Luke 7:14–15 – Jesus raised the widow’s son at Nain.
Luke 8:54–55 – “He took her by the hand and called, saying: ‘Child, get up!’ and her spirit returned.”
Matthew 9:24–25 – Jairus’s daughter was raised physically.

Prophetic Assurances of Earthly Life Restored

Daniel 12:2 – “Many of those asleep in the dust of the earth will wake up.”
Hosea 13:14 – “From the power of the Grave I will redeem them; from death I will recover them.”
Acts 24:15 – “There is going to be a resurrection of both the righteous and the unrighteous.”
Acts 26:8 – “Why is it considered unbelievable among you that God raises the dead?”
Romans 8:19–21 – “Creation itself will also be set free from enslavement to corruption.”
1 Corinthians 15:21–22 – “Since death came through a man, resurrection of the dead also comes through a man.”
1 Corinthians 15:42–44 – Describes the body being raised as a transformed, incorruptible one.
Revelation 20:12–13 – “The dead were judged according to their deeds... and the sea gave up the dead in it.”

Earth Restored as a Habitable Home

Isaiah 11:6–9 – “They will not harm nor cause any ruin in all my holy mountain.”
Isaiah 65:21–23 – “They will build houses and live in them; they will plant vineyards and eat their fruitage.”
Psalm 104:30 – “You send out your spirit, they are created, and you renew the surface of the ground.”
Revelation 21:3–4 – “Death will be no more, neither will mourning nor outcry nor pain be anymore.”

Examples of Physical Resurrections

1 Kings 17:21–22 – Elijah revived the widow’s son.
2 Kings 4:32–35 – Elisha restored the Shunammite’s son.
Acts 9:36–41 – Peter raised Tabitha (Dorcas).
Acts 20:9–12 – Paul revived Eutychus after his fall.

But there are also other scriptures that present a different perception of this term, suggesting that resurrection can be understood in more than one sense—beyond the physical restoration of life on earth and yet still involving the living human body in the present. Even the very scriptures that describe physical resurrection can also carry a spiritual meaning: the “raising up” of a person who is already alive, yet undergoing a deep moral or spiritual renovation.

This does not diminish the hope of a future, literal resurrection. Instead, it adds another dimension. It shows that Jehovah’s power to restore life begins even now, while a person is still breathing. Jesus illustrated this when he said that those who hear his voice “will live,” and also when he told one disciple to “let the dead bury their dead,” indicating that a person may be biologically alive while spiritually lifeless. Paul described a similar awakening in Ephesians, urging believers to “rise from the dead” so that the Christ would shine upon them. Such expressions show that resurrection can begin as an inward transformation—an awakening of conscience, purity, and purpose—long before the physical act of raising the dead in Jehovah’s new world.

Thus, a living person who comes out of darkness, abandons sin, recovers integrity, or awakens spiritually can rightly be described as experiencing a kind of resurrection. Their physical body remains, but their inner condition—mind, heart, perception, and direction—comes alive in a way that reflects Jehovah’s life-giving power.

This spiritual resurrection does not replace the future earthly one; it prepares for it. It trains the heart to respond to Jehovah’s voice now, so that when the time comes for the great restoration of all things, that same heart will be fully ready to live forever in the new world that God promises.

Being “Raised” Now—A Spiritual Awakening

Ephesians 2:4–6 – “God made us alive together with the Christ… and raised us up together and seated us together in the heavenly places.”
Colossians 2:12–13 – “You were buried with him in baptism, and by your faith you were also raised up with him.”
Colossians 3:1–3 – “If, however, you were raised up with the Christ, go on seeking the things above.”
2 Corinthians 5:1–2 – “We know that if our earthly house… is torn down, we have a building from God, a house not made with hands, everlasting in the heavens.”
John 14:2–3 – “In the house of my Father there are many dwelling places… I am going my way to prepare a place for you.”
John 17:24 – Jesus prayed, “Father, I want those whom you have given me to be with me where I am.” Where was he when he said it?

Resurrection Is Not the Repetition of Earthly Life

The scripture that often drew my attention when thinking about marriage was Luke 20:35–36:

“Those who have been counted worthy of gaining that system of things and the resurrection from the dead neither marry nor are given in marriage. In fact, they cannot die anymore, for they are like the angels.”

Jesus was not redefining marriage; he was redefining resurrection itself.

Even before I decided to marry, this statement stood out to me. I wanted to understand how it fit within my belief system—how it related to life, purpose, and resurrection. It seemed to challenge some of the most natural human hopes, especially the longing for companionship and family. I wondered: if the resurrection brings life again, what kind of life will it be?

The context of Jesus’ words helps to clarify this. The Sadducees—who denied the resurrection altogether—approached Jesus with a question designed to trap him. They referred to the Mosaic law on levirate marriage and proposed an extreme scenario: a woman who had been married to seven brothers, each dying in succession. “In the resurrection,” they asked, “whose wife will she be?” (Luke 20:27–33)

Their question sounded logical only within the narrow limits of earthly life, and it revealed how little they understood the nature of resurrection. They ignored the simple truth that death itself dissolves marital bonds. In fact, the very scenario they described proves this: after each husband died, the woman was free to marry again because the previous marriage covenant no longer existed. Why, then, would marriage obligations suddenly reappear in a resurrected life?

But even more, their question failed to harmonize with the deeper meaning Jesus often gave to the term “resurrection”—the moral and spiritual raising up of those who were, in his view, spiritually dead. If Jesus was speaking about the awakening of those dead in sins, then the Sadducees’ hypothetical problem existed entirely outside the message he was bringing. Their puzzle belonged to this life alone; Jesus was pointing to a far greater transformation that begins within a person’s heart long before Jehovah restores physical life.

It is in this context that Jesus added his decisive statement about Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. He reminded the Sadducees of the words Jehovah spoke to Moses: “I am the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob.” Then Jesus concluded: “He is a God, not of the dead, but of the living, for they are all living to him.” — Luke 20:38

The Sadducees believed these patriarchs were simply gone—irretrievably lost in death. Jesus revealed a far different reality: Jehovah’s memory holds their identities intact. Nothing about them has been erased—neither their character nor their story nor their faith. To God, they remain alive, because their future is certain in His purpose and their restoration is guaranteed by His promise.

Thus, Jesus lifted the entire discussion away from the Sadducees’ narrow calculations and into the realm of divine certainty. The resurrection is not an intellectual puzzle about human institutions repeating in the next life; it is the restoration of people whom Jehovah refuses to forget.

Jesus’ reply exposed both their misunderstanding of Scripture and their lack of faith in God’s power. He said, “You do not know the Scriptures nor the power of God.” (Matthew 22:29) By explaining that those who experience the resurrection “neither marry nor are given in marriage,” he showed that resurrected life would not be a mere continuation of human institutions as they exist now. The Sadducees’ mistake lay in applying earthly logic to heavenly realities.

In my first understanding of the resurrection, I accepted the familiar framework: the Bible presents two distinct hopes. One is the earthly hope—life restored in a physical body within the created universe. The other is the heavenly hope—a spiritual body, incorruptible and existing beyond the physical realm.

Yet as my study deepened, I found myself re-evaluating the relationship between these two hopes. Rather than existing in separate compartments, could they reflect two sides of a single divine purpose? Is there a way in which the physical and the spiritual do not merely coexist, but in a sense, harmonize—even “marry,” like two parallel melodies merging into one song?

The more I meditated, the more these two hopes began to connect rather than contrast. And on the page titled Song of Songs, I describe how this harmony formed in my mind—how the imagery of the Bride and the King helped me perceive a deeper unity in God’s purpose for resurrected life, both earthly and heavenly.

Until I personally went through the experience of a transformation in my hope—or rather, the adoption of the heavenly hope as my own—I did not have the mental or spiritual capacity to connect with it. My focus was entirely on the earthly hope: the life I knew, the life I belonged to, the life in which I could clearly see Jehovah’s purpose. I never considered myself worthy of the special selection of the limited group of 144,000—until I realized that Jehovah was extending a personal invitation to me as well. Even now, I do not think of myself as more worthy than many others whom I deeply respect. But it is not merely about personal opinion; it is about accepting Jehovah’s undeserved kindness and pressing forward toward the higher calling. And if anyone else feels that this invitation may have been extended to them, I would encourage them not to hesitate and not to stumble over the number.

Once my perception changed, it became time to reason through what Jesus meant by “not marrying in the resurrection.” First, let me emphasize that a spiritual resurrection now makes perfect sense to me. I can also see how Jesus was an eyewitness to this very reality already in his day.

The Calling of Jesus’ Disciples — Spiritually “Risen” to New Life

When Jesus called men like Peter, Andrew, Phillip, Nathanael, James, John, and Matthew, they left behind their former lives and responded to the call of the Kingdom (Matthew 4:18–22; 9:9). Spiritually, this was a resurrection — a passing from death to life, as Jesus later described:

“Whoever hears my word and believes the One who sent me has everlasting life and does not come into judgment but has passed over from death to life. Most truly I say to you, the hour is coming, and it is now, when the dead will hear the voice of the Son of God, and those who have paid attention will live” (John 5:24–25).

Jesus thus defined resurrection not only as a future event, but as a present transition rooted in hearing and responding.

Heart, Stone, and Tomb — How Scripture Defines Death and Resurrection

When Jesus said that the one who hears his word and believes “has passed over from death to life,” he was not redefining resurrection arbitrarily. He was drawing on a deep and consistent biblical pattern that explains why Scripture can speak of people as “dead” while they are still alive—and why resurrection can begin before a person ever enters a grave.

In Hebrew thought, death is not defined only by the absence of biological life, but by the absence of response to God. Three recurring images help clarify this: the heart, the stone, and the tomb.

The heart represents the inner capacity to hear, understand, and respond. When the heart is receptive, Scripture speaks of life. When it becomes unresponsive, Scripture speaks of death—even if the person is physically alive. This is why the prophets repeatedly address the condition of the heart when speaking about restoration.

The stone represents resistance and unresponsiveness. Ezekiel records Jehovah’s promise: “I will remove the heart of stone from your flesh and give you a heart of flesh.” (Ezekiel 36:26) The problem was not a lack of instruction or covenant, but a condition in which the inner person no longer responded. A stone does not hear. A stone does not answer a call.

The tomb is the outward image of this same condition. A tomb is sealed, silent, and closed. It does not respond until it is opened. In Ezekiel 37, Jehovah moves seamlessly from speaking about inward restoration to speaking about opening graves. The same people are in view. The same Spirit acts. The imagery shifts from inner condition to outward manifestation.

This is why Scripture can describe living people as “dead,” and why resurrection language often centers on hearing a voice. Jesus himself said: “The hour is coming, and it is now, when the dead will hear the voice of the Son of God, and those who have heard will live.” (John 5:25) Life begins with response.

Paul’s Explanation — Two Starting Positions, One Outcome

This understanding also helps reconcile Paul’s later explanation in 1 Thessalonians 4:14–17:

“For if we have faith that Jesus died and was raised up, so also God will bring with him those who have fallen asleep in death through Jesus. For this we tell you by Jehovah’s word, that we the living who survive to the presence of the Lord will in no way precede those who have fallen asleep in death; because the Lord himself will descend from heaven with a commanding call, with an archangel’s voice and with God’s trumpet, and those who are dead in union with Christ will rise first. Afterward we the living who are surviving will be caught away together with them in clouds to meet the Lord in the air; and thus we will always be with the Lord.”

Paul is not presenting a different kind of resurrection, nor is he reversing Jesus’ teaching. He is addressing two different starting positions that move toward one completed outcome.

Some are spiritually alive and remain living until the presence of the Lord. Others, though already in union with Christ, fall asleep in death before that completion occurs. Paul assures believers that those who have fallen asleep are not disadvantaged. They are raised first, not to begin a new life, but to continue the life already begun in union with Christ. Afterward, both the resurrected and the living are gathered together.

In this way, physical resurrection does not replace spiritual resurrection. It restores continuity where physical death temporarily interrupted it, allowing all who belong to Christ to move forward together toward the same promised outcome.

Collective Fulfillment — Not Perfection Apart From One Another

Throughout the Scriptures, we see how Jehovah at times allows his faithful ones to fall asleep in death, awaiting the resurrection. This sleep is not abandonment, but a pause within God’s purpose. At the resurrection, those faithful ones are raised physically—not to complete their course independently, but to continue progressing toward full spiritual fulfillment together with those who are alive at that time.

In this way, resurrection does not divide God’s servants into separate destinies, but reunites them into one forward movement. This harmonizes with Paul’s words:

“And yet all of these, although they received a favorable witness because of their faith, did not receive the fulfillment of the promise, because God foresaw something better for us, so that they might not be made perfect apart from us.”
(Hebrews 11:39–40)

Jehovah’s purpose advances collectively, not individually.

Lazarus — Death as Interruption, Not Cancellation

The account of Lazarus further clarifies how death functions in Jehovah’s purpose—not as a termination of relationship or progress, but as an interruption that Jehovah himself can bridge. Lazarus was a faithful friend of Jesus, loved by him, yet Jesus allowed him to fall asleep in death. This delay was not due to neglect, nor was it a failure of faith. Rather, it revealed that death does not cancel Jehovah’s work in a person; it temporarily suspends it.

When Jesus called Lazarus out of the tomb, Lazarus did not begin a new spiritual journey from the beginning. He resumed life as the same person—still loved, still known, still within Jehovah’s purpose. His resurrection demonstrated that death does not sever continuity. It interrupts it.

In this way, Lazarus’ experience serves as a living illustration of how faithful ones who fall asleep in death are not abandoned or replaced, but are preserved for continuation. Their resurrection is not a separate destiny from those who remain alive, but a reunion within the same forward movement toward the fulfillment of Jehovah’s purpose.

The Apostolic Reflection — Raised Together in Christ

What Jesus described in John 5:24–25 is later reflected in Paul’s words:

“When we were dead in our trespasses, [God] made us alive together with the Christ… and he raised us up together and seated us together in the heavenly places in union with Christ Jesus.”

This “raising up” began while Jesus was still alive, through faith and discipleship. It confirms that resurrection, as Scripture presents it, begins with awakening and response—and moves forward, without interruption, toward its full realization.

The Woman with the Sinful Reputation (Luke 7:36–50)

This woman approached Jesus while he was dining at Simon the Pharisee’s house. She showed deep repentance, washing his feet with her tears. Jesus declared:

“Your sins are forgiven… your faith has saved you; go in peace” (Luke 7:48, 50).

She experienced a spiritual resurrection at that moment. She was spiritually “dead” because of her sins, but upon hearing and responding to the voice of the Son of God, she was raised to spiritual life — forgiven, reconciled, and given a new standing before God.

Zacchaeus the Tax Collector (Luke 19:1–10)

Zacchaeus was a notorious tax collector, spiritually “dead” in a corrupt life. But when Jesus came to his house, he responded with repentance and faith, vowing to restore what he had extorted. Jesus declared:

“Today salvation has come to this house, because he too is a son of Abraham. For the Son of man came to seek and save what was lost” (Luke 19:9–10).

Zacchaeus was not literally raised from the dead. But he underwent a complete spiritual transformation — a resurrection of a living person into a new standing before God, anticipating the heavenly Kingdom.

The Sadducees’ blindness becomes even clearer when contrasted with the real transformations taking place right before their eyes. While they debated abstract scenarios about marriage after death, they completely missed the kind of resurrection Jesus was already performing among the living. When Zacchaeus stood before Jesus and declared that he would repay anyone he had defrauded and give half of his possessions to the poor, Jesus did not merely praise his generosity—he announced a resurrection of the heart: “Today salvation has come to this house.” (Luke 19:8, 9) Likewise, when the sinful woman wept at Jesus’ feet, washing them with her tears and wiping them with her hair, her old life died and something entirely new was raised in its place—faith, love, and purity of devotion. (Luke 7:36–50) These were not theoretical debates; they were living demonstrations of the power of God to raise up those spiritually dead. Yet the Sadducees, absorbed in technical arguments and bound by disbelief, failed to recognize that the resurrection they denied was already beginning in the very people who responded to Jesus with repentance and faith.

The Criminal on the Stake (Luke 23:39–43)

Even while Jesus hung on the stake, the repentant criminal heard his voice, recognized him as King, and expressed faith. Jesus told him:

“Truly I tell you today, you will be with me in Paradise” (Luke 23:43).

Although this man would experience earthly resurrection later, notice what happened while Jesus was alive:

He repented, believed, and gained assurance of life.
Spiritually, he “heard the voice of the Son of God and lived” his last minutes. (John 5:25).
His spiritual resurrection took place in faith and repentance before death.
And if we, imperfect as we are, can remember him with compassion, what would make Jehovah forget such a man?

Why These Examples Matter

All these cases fit Jesus’ words in John 5:24–25:

“The hour is coming and it is now when the dead will hear the voice of the Son of God, and those who have paid attention will live.”

This “hour” was already happening during Jesus’ ministry. He was spiritually raising the living — preparing those who would later receive the heavenly resurrection to immortal life (after his death and Pentecost), as well as those who would inherit life on earth in the future Paradise.

Key Insight

These are examples of the “more important resurrection” already beginning during Jesus’ life — not physical resurrections from the grave, but spiritual resurrections of living people, through repentance, faith, and response to the Kingdom call.

This is precisely why Jesus told the Sadducees:

“You don’t know the Scriptures nor the power of God.”

The resurrection he was emphasizing was already underway, not in tombs but in hearts.

Summary of Luke 20:35–36

When Jesus said that those “counted worthy of the resurrection neither marry nor are given in marriage,” he was confronting men who denied the resurrection entirely. Their question assumed that life after resurrection must simply repeat earthly patterns—marriage, inheritance, and the obligations of levirate law. Jesus showed that they misunderstood both Scripture and the power of God. His answer shifted the discussion to something far greater: Jehovah restores life on His terms, not by the limitations of human reasoning.

This raises a searching question: “Counted worthy” — should that be our primary concern as living people?

Jehovah is not forgetful or mechanical; He remembers every sincere effort, every step toward repentance, every longing for what is right. If imperfect humans can remember the repentant criminal next to Jesus, how much more will Jehovah retain the full identity of those who turn toward Him? Being “counted worthy” does not mean flawless behavior — it means responding to truth, seeking righteousness, and aligning the heart with Jehovah’s purpose.

Another question naturally follows:
What exactly is restored in the resurrection?

A biological body can be recreated from dust. But identity is not just molecules. It includes:

conscience
memories
moral habits
emotional inclinations
personal history
learned wisdom
the unique shape of a person’s heart

A physical clone is not the same person unless these inner qualities are also restored. And Jehovah, who numbers hairs, stores tears, and records every faithful act in His “book of remembrance,” will not resurrect a blank copy. His memory preserves the whole person — not just the structure of the body, but the story of the heart.

From this viewpoint, resurrection becomes much more than reanimation. It is a complete reconstitution of the human being — the inner and outer person brought back together in perfect integrity. The purpose is not to create replicas, but to restore the real individuals who once walked the earth.

In Jesus’ case, Jehovah demonstrated that identity is not bound to a single form of existence. Jesus moved between heavenly and earthly life, between spiritual and physical embodiment, without any loss of personality, memory, or purpose. This shows that Jehovah can preserve and restore identity perfectly, even when the mode of existence changes.

Thus, Jesus’ reply went far beyond correcting a trick question.

He revealed that resurrection is an act of perfect remembrance and perfect restoration, carried out by a God who knows each person fully. It begins with faith now — the awakening of conscience and the stirring of the heart — and it culminates when Jehovah brings the whole person back to life, body and memory, identity and experience, reunited according to His love and power. Jehovah alone determines the form of restored life, and Scripture shows that He is able to preserve identity perfectly regardless of the form He chooses. Yet the central biblical hope consistently returns to Jehovah’s original purpose for the earth, where restored humans live fully and meaningfully as He intended from the beginning.

Why Jesus Could Say That Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob Are “Alive for God”

This is why Jesus could answer the Sadducees with words that reached far beyond their narrow reasoning. He told them:

“He is a God, not of the dead, but of the living, for they are all living to him.” — Luke 20:38

Jesus was not saying that Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob were literally alive at that moment. He was not teaching conscious existence in death. The Sadducees denied the resurrection, and Jesus exposed their mistake by showing them Jehovah’s perspective, not human limitations.

To Jehovah, these patriarchs are living, because:

He remembers them perfectly
Their identity is fully intact in His memory
Their future life is guaranteed by His purpose
No detail of who they are has been lost
His promise to them is as certain as if already fulfilled

To God, a person is not “gone” when their biological life ends. They continue to exist in the most secure place possible — in His perfect memory, where nothing fades or corrupts.

This is the full restoration of that same person, not a clone or a copy.

Therefore, Jesus was not correcting the Sadducees with philosophy; He was correcting them with the reality of Jehovah’s remembrance.

To the Sadducees, Abraham was dead because they could not imagine resurrection.
To Jehovah, Abraham is alive because nothing about him is lost.

This is why Jesus could speak with such confidence:

Jehovah’s promises to the patriarchs are still active.
Their futures are still open.
Their resurrection is guaranteed.

In Jehovah’s eyes, people whose identities are preserved, whose futures are certain, and whose relationship with Him continues unbroken are truly “living,” even though they sleep in death.

Resurrection in Scripture — A Unified Pattern

Before continuing, it is helpful to pause and observe how the Bible uses the word resurrection in more than one interconnected way. Scripture does not treat resurrection as a single event with a single meaning, but as a unified process that unfolds across different stages of life and death.

Across the Hebrew Scriptures, Jesus’ teachings, the apostolic writings, and Revelation, resurrection consistently appears in three interrelated dimensions:

Resurrection of the heart — the awakening of conscience, faith, and responsiveness while a person is still alive. Jesus described this when he said that “the dead will hear the voice of the Son of God, and those who have paid attention will live.” This resurrection begins now, in the inner person.
Resurrection of the person — the preservation of identity, memory, and relationship with Jehovah through death. Though a person “falls asleep,” nothing about who they are is lost to God. From Jehovah’s perspective, they remain alive because their restoration is certain.
Resurrection of the body — the future restoration of physical life in God’s due time, whether to life on earth or to immortal life in heaven, according to Jehovah’s purpose.

These three dimensions do not compete with one another.
They belong together.

Spiritual awakening does not replace future resurrection, and physical resurrection does not erase the need for inner renewal. Instead, resurrection begins with hearing and responding, continues through God’s perfect remembrance, and is completed when life is fully restored under Kingdom rule.

This framework allows the Scriptures to speak truthfully about resurrection as both present and future, spiritual and physical, without contradiction.

Jehovah’s Memory — The Continuity That Makes Resurrection Certain

Resurrection does not depend on a hidden immortal part of humans.
It depends on Jehovah’s perfect memory.

Scripture repeatedly shows that Jehovah does not merely remember that someone existed — he remembers who they are. Identity, character, experiences, intentions, and the full pattern of a person’s life are preserved in His memory without loss or distortion.

This is why Job could pray with confidence:

“You will call, and I will answer you. You will long for the work of your hands.” (Job 14:15, NWT)

Jehovah’s remembrance is not passive recollection; it is active intention.
What He remembers, He is able — and determined — to restore.

This is also why Jesus could say of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob:

“He is a God, not of the dead, but of the living, for they are all living to him.” (Luke 20:38, NWT)

They were not alive in consciousness, yet they were alive in Jehovah’s purpose. Their identities had not dissolved, their future had not closed, and their restoration was as certain as if already accomplished.

Thus, resurrection unfolds in a coherent order:

Awakening begins when a person hears and responds to God’s voice.
Continuity is preserved through Jehovah’s perfect remembrance.
Restoration is completed when life is fully returned under Kingdom rule.

As Jesus warned:

“Do not become fearful of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul.” (Matthew 10:28, NWT)

Human power can end biological life.
Only Jehovah governs whether a person’s entire future — their soul, their identity, their life — remains preserved or is finally lost.

Chapter 2

The Day the Dead Awoke: Matthew’s Hidden Revelation

Few verses in the Gospel record are as brief—and yet as astonishing—as Matthew 27:51–53:

"And look! the curtain of the sanctuary was torn in two, from top to bottom, and the earth quaked, and the rocks were split. And the tombs were opened, and many bodies of the holy ones who had fallen asleep were raised up  (and people coming out from among the tombs after his being raised up entered into the holy city), and they became visible to many people. But when the army officer and those with him keeping watch over Jesus saw the earthquake and the things happening, they grew very much afraid and said: “Certainly this was God’s Son.”

They flash by in two sentences, almost hidden beneath the thunder of the earthquake and the tearing of the temple curtain. And yet, in those two verses, Matthew opens a door that no other Gospel writer dares to touch.

He speaks of tombs breaking open.
He speaks of “holy ones raised.”
He speaks of them “becoming visible” only after Jesus Himself rises.

No other writer mentions this moment.
No tradition expands on it.
No commentary explains it fully.

It stands in Scripture like a sealed chamber of the temple—visible, undeniable, yet waiting for someone to step inside and understand why Matthew placed it there, and why he alone preserved it.

For many years, these verses have puzzled readers.
Some force them into literal resurrection.
Some dismiss them as symbolic.
Most simply move past them, unsure of what to do.

But Matthew’s Gospel was written for Hebrew ears.
It sings in the language of Daniel and Isaiah.
It trembles with prophetic imagery known deeply by the Jewish mind.

And when we look at these verses through a Hebrew lens—through the language of awakening, rising, and revelation—a hidden harmony emerges.

The scene Matthew describes is not a grotesque moment of corpses thrown from tombs.
It is a spiritual eruption, a prophetic awakening, timed perfectly with the moment the Messiah breathes His last.

What Matthew preserved is not a horror—
but a revelation.

And once the reader sees it,
they cannot unsee it.

Let us step quietly into these verses,
as though drawing near to the torn curtain itself,
and let Matthew reveal what he always intended his readers to perceive.

Questions That Demand an Answer:

Questions for Those Who Believe Matthew 27:52–53 Describes Dead Bodies Thrown from Tombs

The following questions are for readers who assume Matthew is simply describing dead bodies ejected from tombs by the earthquake, and that the “holy ones” were nothing more than corpses exposed on the hillside:

If people saw bodies thrown out of tombs on Nisan 14—at a time when full travel was allowed—why didn’t they rush into Jerusalem and report it immediately before sunset?
Why does Matthew say the holy ones entered Jerusalem only after Jesus’ resurrection, instead of right after the earthquake itself?
If the earthquake happened around 3 PM, why would any witness wait 40–48 hours to deliver such alarming news?
Why does Matthew connect their “appearance” to Jesus rising, and not to the earthquake that supposedly exposed the bodies?
Why does Matthew call them “holy ones raised” instead of describing them as “bodies thrown out of tombs”?
Why does Matthew say they “became visible to many” instead of saying they “told many” or “reported what they saw”?
If Matthew intended to describe witnesses bringing news, why does he not use words like “spoke,” “testified,” or “reported to the city”?
Why does Matthew use the same resurrection verb (egeirō) for these ‘holy ones’ that he uses for Jesus Himself—a verb that never means “fell out of a tomb”?
Why would Jews delay reporting a massive impurity crisis—exposed corpses—until after the festival Sabbaths, when such defilement was urgent and serious?
If the “holy ones” were merely dead bodies lying in the open, why does Matthew say they entered Jerusalem—not the people who saw them?
Matthew’s grammar makes the “holy ones” the acting subjects, not the witnesses.
How could dead corpses “become visible” only after Jesus’ resurrection if they were supposedly lying in plain view for two full days?
Why does Matthew delay their “visibility” until the moment Christ rises, unless that visibility was spiritual, not anatomical?
If their appearance was simply a human report carried by witnesses, why doesn’t Matthew say, “people reported what they saw”?
What changed on the third day that suddenly made these same ‘holy ones’ visible?
The bodies didn’t change—the people changed. What caused that change?
Why does Matthew tie their visibility directly to Jesus’ resurrection instead of to the earthquake, unless their visibility was an internal awakening of faith?
Why would Matthew use the term “holy ones” if what people supposedly saw were decaying corpses shaken out of burial niches?
Which makes more sense?
a) dozens of festering corpses lying outside tombs for two days unnoticed by the Gospel writers,
or
b) the prophetic awakening of disciples whose hearts were shaken by Jesus’ death and revived by His resurrection?

Questions for Those Who Read the KJV or Similar Translations Suggesting a Physical Resurrection

"And, behold, the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom; and the earth did quake, and the rocks rent; And the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose, And came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the holy city, and appeared unto many."

The following questions are for readers whose Bibles say things like “the bodies of the saints which slept arose” (KJV), giving the impression that physically dead believers came back to life and walked into Jerusalem:

If these “saints” literally resurrected, why did none of the other Gospels mention such an extraordinary miracle? Not even Luke, who carefully documented every major resurrection event.
Why is there no record anywhere in the New Testament that anyone recognized these resurrected individuals or wrote down their names?
Why does Acts—Luke’s sequel—never mention Jerusalem being shaken by a mass resurrection during Passover?
Why did the chief priests, scribes, Pharisees, and Sanhedrin make no statement, opposition, denial, or accusation about dozens of resurrected Israelites appearing in the city?
Why does Matthew say they became visible only after Jesus’ resurrection, if they were already alive and moving for two days prior?
Why would Jehovah resurrect holy ones two days before His own Son, then keep them hidden until Jesus rose?
Why is there no teaching in the Christian Scriptures explaining who these resurrected saints were, what they said, or what happened to them afterward?
If literal resurrected saints walked into Jerusalem, why does Paul—who argued resurrection doctrine extensively—never mention this event once in any letter?
Why does Jesus never reference this mass resurrection when proving His own?
Why does the KJV translate the Greek words as “arose” and “went into the holy city,” when Matthew’s syntax actually makes the “holy ones” the subject only after Jesus’ resurrection?
If dead saints literally resurrected, were they taken to heaven afterwards? Or did they die twice? Why is no doctrine provided for this scenario?
Why would Jehovah resurrect Old Testament saints during the Mosaic Law era—when Jesus Himself said resurrection belongs to the Kingdom age, not before it?
Why do KJV-style translations ignore the prophetic background (Daniel, Isaiah, Ezekiel, Hosea) where “arising,” “awakening,” and “standing up” describe spiritual revival, not physical resurrection?
Why does Matthew use resurrection language that fits perfectly with spiritual awakening in Hebrew prophecy, but not with physical resuscitation?
Why is there no second-century Christian tradition, commentary, or oral history describing literal resurrected saints walking the streets of Jerusalem? None. Zero.
Why would Matthew—the most Jewish Gospel—suddenly introduce a resurrection doctrine contradicting everything Jesus taught about the timing of the resurrection?
Why does this event appear nowhere in the writings of early historians such as Josephus or Tacitus?

Why Matthew Uses Prophetic Resurrection

Language(Expanded with the Hebrew-original Gospel factor)

Matthew 27:52–53 contains one of the most unusual statements in the Gospel accounts:

“And the tombs were opened, and many bodies of the holy ones who had fallen asleep were raised up…”

To modern readers, this wording appears puzzling.
But to Matthew’s original audience, it was instantly familiar.

One crucial historical factor explains this:

⭐ Matthew originally wrote his Gospel in Hebrew (or Hebrew-Aramaic).

This is attested by the earliest Christian writers:

Papias (early 2nd century) wrote that “Matthew composed the sayings in the Hebrew language, and each interpreted them as he was able.”

Later writers such as Irenaeus, Origen, Eusebius, and Jerome echo the same tradition.

This means:

✔ Matthew’s original audience was Jewish,
✔ they read Hebrew,
✔ and they were trained in prophetic, symbolic resurrection language found throughout the Hebrew Scriptures.

His wording fits their world, their thinking, and their interpretive framework.

In contrast:

⭐ Luke wrote in Greek for a Gentile audience.

Greek-speaking readers did not have the same prophetic vocabulary.
They did not think in Hebrew symbols, idioms, or resurrection metaphors.

They would not naturally understand imagery such as:

-“opening graves,”
-“holy ones raised,”
-or “entering the holy city”

in a symbolic prophetic sense.

Therefore:

✔ Matthew could use familiar Hebrew prophetic idioms
✔ Luke could not use the same wording
✔ Luke instead described the actual observable reaction:

the crowds beat their chests in repentance (Luke 23:48)

This becomes a perfect harmony:

Matthew gives the Hebrew prophetic interpretation

Luke gives the Greek historical description

Both describe the same event from different viewpoints.

Hebrew Readers Recognized Symbolic Resurrection Instantly

The Hebrew Scriptures frequently use “resurrection” language symbolically:

Ezekiel 37 — Dry bones standing up

Not literal — spiritual revival.

Hosea 6:1–2 — “He will raise us up”

Repentance, return to Jehovah.

Isaiah 26:19 — “Awake and shout joyfully!”

Restoration.

Matthew uses their vocabulary.
Luke, writing in Greek, speaks differently.

Hebrew Use of “Raise Up”

To Matthew’s Jewish audience, “raise up” could mean:

Psalm 30:3: "O Jehovah, you have lifted me up from the Grave. You kept me alive; you spared me from sinking into the pit."

Psalm 71:20: "Though you have made me experience much distress and calamity, Revive me again; Bring me up from the depths of the earth."

Daniel 12:2: "And many of those asleep in the dust of the earth will wake up, some to everlasting life and others to reproach and to everlasting contempt."

The Hebrew-speaking believers reading Matthew’s Gospel would naturally understand this symbolic register.

Greek-speaking readers reading Luke would not.

Thus Luke stays factual, not symbolic.

The Signs at Jesus’ Death Match Hebrew Prophetic Drama

Matthew’s Hebrew readers knew these prophetic patterns:

darkness = divine judgment

earthquake = divine intervention

opening = revelation

raising = awakening

Matthew uses this prophetic drama fluently.

Luke gives the observable details — no symbolic language.

Two Audiences, Two Styles, One Event

This is key:

► Matthew writes like a Jewish prophet

in the Hebrew language,
using familiar symbolism.

► Luke writes like a Greek historian

for Gentile readers,
using clear, literal description.

The same event is shown through two legitimate lenses:

Matthew: the spiritual meaning.
Luke: the physical reaction.

Conclusion: Why Matthew Used Such Language

Matthew could use symbolic resurrection language because:

✔ He originally wrote in Hebrew, where such imagery was common.
✔ His audience understood the prophetic style of Ezekiel, Isaiah, Hosea, and the Psalms.
✔ They knew “raising” and “awakening” could describe repentance and spiritual revival.
✔ They recognized the prophetic cluster of signs (darkness, earthquake, chest-beating).
✔ Luke, writing in Greek, used simple narrative instead of prophetic idioms.

Thus Matthew 27:52–53 is not confusing —
it is Hebrew prophecy describing spiritual resurrection,
perfectly in harmony with Luke and Paul.

APPENDIX: Hebrew Witnesses to Matthew 27:52–53

and the Prophetic Language of Resurrection

Understanding Matthew’s description of the opened tombs and the “holy ones raised up” requires recognizing how Hebrew language expresses resurrection, awakening, and prophetic revival.

Ancient Christian writers (Papias, Irenaeus, Origen, Eusebius, and Jerome) all testified that Matthew originally wrote his Gospel in Hebrew. His first audience therefore understood Hebrew prophetic vocabulary instinctively.

By comparing three Hebrew witnesses to Matthew 27:52–53, we can see clearly how the Hebrew linguistic field allows—and even encourages—a symbolic, spiritual reading, fully consistent with the Tanakh.

These three witnesses are:

1. the Modern Hebrew New Testament

2. the Delitzsch Hebrew New Testament

3. Shem-Tob’s Hebrew Matthew (the earliest Hebrew witness)

Each contributes something important.

1. Modern Hebrew Translation (Modern Hebrew New Testament)

Matthew 27:52 in modern Hebrew (example):

“והקברים נפתחו ורבים מגופות הקדושים ישני אדמת עפר נעורו׃”

Key features of this version:

The word “גופות” (“bodies”) appears here.

This does not appear in earlier Hebrew witnesses and is not required by the Greek text.
This addition pushes the reader toward imagining literal physical bodies.

The phrase “ישני אדמת עפר” (“the sleepers of the dusty ground”) is a direct echo of Daniel 12:2.

This phrase is famously symbolic in Jewish tradition and refers not only to literal death but also to spiritual dormancy and discouragement.

The verb “נעורו” means “they awoke,” from the root עור (“to awaken,” “to arouse,” “to stir”).

This verb frequently appears in prophetic and poetic contexts for inner awakening, not merely physical rising.

Even with the added word “bodies,” the Hebrew vocabulary still carries Danielic overtones. A spiritually attuned reader can easily understand the passage in terms of prophetic awakening rather than literal corpses rising.

2. Delitzsch Hebrew New Testament (DNT)

Delitzsch aimed to express the New Testament in Biblical-style Hebrew.
His version reads:

“והקברים נפתחו ורבים מן־הקדושים ישני אדמת עפר נעורו׃”

What is significant here:

There is no reference to bodies.

Instead, the text simply says “many of the holy ones who were sleepers of the dust.”
This already removes the literalistic pressure.

The same Danielic phrase appears: “sleepers of the dust of the ground.”

A Hebrew reader immediately thinks of Daniel 12 and Ezekiel 37.

The same prophetic verb appears for awakening: “נעורו.”

This is the same verb used for emotional stirring, prophetic revival, and the awakening of love in the Song of Songs.

In this form, the verse naturally harmonizes with a symbolic reading: an awakening of conscience, perception, and faith at the moment of Jesus’ death.

3. Shem-Tob’s Hebrew Matthew (Earliest Extant Hebrew Witness)

Shem-Tob’s Matthew, preserved in the medieval work Even Boḥan, is the oldest Hebrew version of Matthew available today and is believed to preserve traces of a much earlier Hebrew original.

Matthew 27:52 in Shem-Tob reads:

“הקברים נפתחו ורבים מישני אדמת עפר קמו”

Important observations:

Again, no mention of bodies.

The phrase “ישני אדמת עפר” is preserved in a form that strongly mirrors Daniel 12.

The verb “קמו” means “arose,” but in Hebrew it has a wide range of meanings.

It can refer to someone standing up physically,
to a new prophet “arising,”
to a king being raised up,
or to a spiritual renewal or moral awakening.

Thus the Shem-Tob reading is the one most deeply rooted in prophetic language. It sounds much less like corpses walking and much more like Ezekiel 37, Daniel 12, Isaiah 26, Hosea 6, and other passages where resurrection imagery describes revival, repentance, and divine intervention.

4. How Hebrew Vocabulary Itself Encourages a Symbolic Understanding

Across all Hebrew versions, certain words appear consistently.
These words carry prophetic meaning in the Hebrew Bible:

“נפתחו” (“were opened”): used for opening eyes, opening understanding, and divine revelation, not just the opening of physical objects.

“נעורו” (“they awoke”): used not only for waking from sleep, but for inner stirring, renewal of spirit, and revival of devotion.

“קמו” (“arose”): one of the most flexible verbs in Hebrew, often describing the rise of a leader, the emergence of a new spiritual state, or the restoration of hope.

“ישני אדמת עפר” (“sleepers of the dust”): a rare prophetic expression drawn from Daniel 12, understood for centuries as symbolic of those whose hopes are low, whose spirits are discouraged, or whose faith lies dormant.

A Hebrew reader familiar with the Tanakh—especially Daniel, Ezekiel, Isaiah, and Hosea—would immediately recognize resurrection imagery as a metaphor for spiritual awakening.

This makes Matthew’s original wording perfectly consistent with a non-literal, prophetic description of people “awakening” in response to Jesus’ death.

5. Why Matthew Could Use This Language—and Why Luke Did Not

Because Matthew originally wrote in Hebrew, he could employ the full range of Hebrew prophetic vocabulary. His audience understood this language instinctively.

Luke, however, wrote directly in Greek.
Greek does not possess these Hebrew prophetic layers.
A Greek audience reading Greek prose cannot “hear” Daniel 12 and Ezekiel 37 behind the words.

Therefore:

Matthew uses vivid symbolic Hebrew phrasing (“sleepers of the dust,” “awoke,” “arose”).

Luke focuses on observable events: “the crowds beat their chests,” expressing sorrow and repentance.

Both writers describe the same moment—one through Hebrew prophetic imagery, the other through Greek historical reporting.

Together, they form a complementary picture.

Conclusion of Appendix

The Hebrew witnesses show that Matthew’s language:

is fully consistent with Jewish prophetic idiom,
carries layers of meaning beyond the literal,
draws its vocabulary directly from Danielic resurrection imagery,
allows for symbolic awakening of faith and conscience,
does not require a literal rising of dead bodies.

Thus Matthew 27:52–53 can be correctly understood as describing:

the spiritual awakening and inner resurrection of “holy ones” whose hearts were shaken open by the death of God’s Son—a profound moment of conscience, repentance, and new spiritual perception.

Chapter 3

When the Risen Christ Drew Near —

The Mystery of His Many Appearances

No moment in human history compares to the hours and days after Jesus’ resurrection. He had been executed publicly, sealed in a tomb, guarded by Roman soldiers, and mourned as lost. Yet early on the first day of the week, the unthinkable occurred: he appeared—alive again.

But what astonished the disciples even more than the miracle of his resurrection was the manner in which he appeared.

The Gospels do not portray a single dramatic unveiling but a series of encounters—quiet, personal, purposeful—each one tailored to the heart of the one receiving him. And in each appearance, Jesus manifested himself in a form appropriate to the moment. He came, as the scriptures say, “in different bodies,” or different outward forms, so that he might reach each one individually and awaken faith in their hearts.

This was not illusion.
It was not deception.
It was mercy.

It was the Great Shepherd coming to gather his scattered sheep—one by one.

1. Mary Magdalene — The Voice That Unlocked a Heart

Mary did not recognize him at first. She saw a man whom she assumed to be the gardener. Her grief blinded her; her tears had filled her eyes with sorrow, not expectation.

But then he spoke her name.

“Mary!”

In that instant, recognition flooded her. The familiar tone, the warmth, the authority—everything she knew from his earthly life returned in one moment of pure clarity. Jesus appeared to her in a body she did not at first recognize, and yet the voice of the Shepherd broke through the darkness.

Her heart was resurrected before she fully grasped the miracle of his own.

2. The Road to Emmaus — The Stranger Who Opened the Scriptures

Two disciples walked away from Jerusalem, their hopes shattered. Jesus joined them as a traveler, but their eyes were “kept from recognizing him.” He appeared as a stranger, yet he opened the Scriptures with a depth that set their hearts ablaze.

They later confessed:

“Were not our hearts burning within us as he was speaking to us on the road?” (Luke 24:32)

Only when he broke the bread—an action unmistakably familiar—did they recognize him. And in that moment of spiritual awakening, he disappeared.

Jesus had come to them in a different form, not to conceal himself, but to prepare their hearts before revealing himself.

3. Behind Locked Doors — The Presence That Removed Fear

The disciples hid in fear, doors barred, hearts trembling. Suddenly Jesus stood among them—not as a ghost, not as a memory, but in a body that could be seen, touched, and embraced. His appearance was familiar, yet transformed. They knew his face, his hands, his voice, but there was something heavenly—peaceful, unbounded—about his presence.

He breathed upon them:

“Receive holy spirit.”

This was more than reassurance.
It was resurrection of spirit.

Fear dissolved. Purpose returned. Their hearts were alive again.

4. Thomas — The Body That Answered Doubt

Thomas demanded evidence. Jesus could have rebuked him. Instead, he appeared again—this time in a form unmistakably physical, bearing the marks of sacrifice.

“Put your finger here. See my hands.”

Thomas’s faith was not restored by logic or teaching, but by encounter—the risen Christ meeting him exactly where his doubts lay.

5. The Sea of Galilee — The Familiar Figure on the Shore

To Peter and the others, discouraged and returning to fishing, Jesus appeared as a man cooking breakfast by the sea. They did not recognize him at first. But the miraculous catch, the tone of his voice, and the warmth of his invitation—

“Come, take your breakfast”

—were enough. It was Jesus, meeting them not in a temple or a vision, but in their daily life. Here, in this simple moment, he restored Peter—calling him three times to express the love he once denied.

6. Why “Different Bodies”?

The Scriptures emphasize that Jesus was resurrected as a spirit person (1 Peter 3:18). Yet he manifested himself in various physical forms—bodies appropriate for each appearance—each one designed to teach, heal, or reveal.

This is not unusual for spirit creatures:

Angels appeared as men of different ages and forms.
Jehovah’s messengers could be recognized or unrecognized depending on their purpose.
Jesus himself appeared to Paul in a light brighter than the sun—completely unlike his appearances to the other disciples.

What mattered was not his outward form, but the impact on the heart of the one seeing him.

7. The Pattern of Revelation — Awakening Before Recognition

In nearly every appearance:

first came blindness, grief, confusion, or fear,
then came revelation—opening of eyes, hearts, and understanding,
and only then did recognition occur.

This was resurrection not only of Jesus’ body,
but of the disciples’ faith.

Their spiritual senses came alive.

Their hearts, once sealed like tombs, were opened.

The very process Matthew describes—tombs cracked open, holy ones appearing alive—was happening inside them.

8. The Same Gardener Works Today

Jesus appears now, not physically, but through:

the congregation—his lampstands
the Scriptures—his bread
the spirit—his voice
shepherds—his stars in the right hand

He still comes in “different forms,” suited to each heart:

through a talk that awakens conscience
through a scripture that suddenly pierces
through counsel that arrives at the perfect moment
through the quiet certainty that Jehovah has drawn near

The disciples needed these appearances to rise from despair into mission. Today, Jesus awakens hearts the same way—one by one, according to need, according to readiness, according to faith.

In Summary

Jesus’ resurrection appearances were not simply proofs of life.
They were acts of spiritual creation—moments of awakening tailored to the hearts of those he loved.

He appeared in many forms because he was restoring many hearts.

And the work he began in the first century continues today, for he is still:

the Gardener of the new creation,
the Shepherd of scattered sheep,
the Light who breaks open the tombs of the heart.

Chapter 4

Matthew: The Gospel Written for Hebrew Ears

When we read Matthew, we often forget that this Gospel was not originally shaped for a Greek-speaking world. Early Christian writers—Papias, Irenaeus, Origen, Eusebius, and Jerome—all preserved the same memory: Matthew first wrote his Gospel in Hebrew.

This single historical fact changes the way we perceive his entire narrative.

Matthew did not compose his record for an audience unfamiliar with the Tanakh. He wrote for those who prayed in Hebrew idioms, argued in rabbinic expressions, lived inside the rhythm of the Torah, and recognized prophetic echoes the moment they heard them. His Gospel is not simply a biography of Jesus. It is a deliberate reconstruction of Israel’s story through the Messiah—woven with patterns, phrases, and metaphors that only a Hebrew mind could fully appreciate.

It is no surprise, then, that Matthew alone records the mysterious sign at Jesus’ death: the opened tombs and the “holy ones raised up.”

Modern readers struggle to understand this passage. Greek readers in the first century likely struggled as well. But Matthew’s Hebrew audience heard something familiar—something that belonged to the language of the prophets.

To understand Matthew, we must listen with Hebrew ears.

1. A Gospel Built on Hebrew Prophetic Language

Matthew’s Gospel is saturated with prophetic idioms that come directly from the Hebrew Scriptures. He rarely explains them, because his readers did not need explanations. They lived inside this language.

“The Kingdom of the heavens”

Only Matthew uses this expression. It is a Hebrew reverential way to speak of Jehovah’s rule—malkhut shamayim—avoiding the direct use of God’s name. Jews of the first century understood this instantly. Greek readers did not.

“To fulfill what was spoken by the prophet”

Matthew introduces several episodes with this formula. It is not merely a literary device. It is the Jewish way of saying:
“Here is where the Scriptures come alive again.”
Matthew interprets Jesus’ life as a continuation of the covenant story—an approach that makes little sense to those outside the Hebrew prophetic tradition.

Binding and loosing

Only Matthew records Jesus using the rabbinic idiom “bind” and “loose.”
To Jewish ears, these words describe legal and interpretive authority:
what is forbidden and what is permitted.
To Greek ears, the words were opaque.

Matthew is speaking to Hebrews.

2. Midrashic Storytelling: Jesus as the New Moses

Matthew shapes his Gospel with a distinctly Hebrew narrative technique: midrash—a way of recounting events so that Scripture itself becomes a living commentary.

His readers immediately noticed the parallels:

Herod’s slaughter of infants mirrors Pharaoh’s slaughter.
Jesus crossing the Jordan mirrors Israel crossing the sea.
The forty days in the wilderness mirror Israel’s forty years.
The Sermon on the Mount mirrors Moses giving the Law from Sinai.

Matthew arranges Jesus’ teachings into five major discourses, mirroring the five books of the Torah.
A Hebrew reader sees this immediately.
A Gentile reader does not.

Matthew is not simply telling a story.
He is retelling Israel’s story through the Messiah.

3. Messianic Titles That Only Jews Would Recognize

Matthew gives Jesus titles that carry weight only for those who know the Hebrew Scriptures deeply.

“Son of David”

This term appears more in Matthew than anywhere else. In Jewish expectation, it signals royal authority and covenant promise from 2 Samuel 7. Matthew presents Jesus as the rightful heir to David’s throne.

“Immanuel”

Matthew alone quotes Isaiah 7:14 using the Hebrew name.

A Hebrew ear hears not a theological argument but a promise:

“God is with us.”
“Rachel weeping for her children”

Matthew quotes Jeremiah 31:15 to describe the sorrow in Bethlehem.
Rachel—the symbolic mother of Israel—awakens deep emotions in Jewish memory.
No other Gospel speaks this way.

4. Genealogy Structured Through Hebrew Eyes

Matthew’s genealogy is not simply a list of ancestors.
It is arranged in three groups of fourteen generations.
This number-pattern is Hebrew symbolism—based on the numerical value of David’s name (דוד) which equals 14.

Matthew is telling his Hebrew readers:

“Jesus is the true Davidic heir. The Messiah has arrived.”

Greek readers would never see this pattern.
Hebrew readers could not miss it.

5. Semitic Syntax and Hebrew Wordplays

Matthew writes like someone thinking in Hebrew, even when translated into Greek.

Expressions such as:

“Amen, I say to you…”
“They lifted up their eyes…”
“Their hearts became heavy…”
“Son of Man…”

are Hebrew idioms that only make full sense to a Hebrew thinker.
These are echoes of the spoken Hebrew and Aramaic of first-century synagogues.

6. Legal and Ritual Details for a Jewish Audience

Matthew explains issues of ritual purity, Sabbath disputes, and priestly service with remarkable ease. His Gospel assumes—without explanation—that his readers understand:

Temple law,
priestly precedent,
the meaning of showbread,
and the prophetic critiques of Israel’s shepherds.

He writes for those who already know the Law intimately.

7. Symbolic Resurrection Language: The Key to Matthew 27:52–53

Here is the heart of this chapter.
Matthew alone records the phenomenon of “holy ones raised up” at Jesus’ death.
This passage has puzzled interpreters for centuries—but not Matthew’s original audience.

Hebrews recognized the vocabulary immediately. The phrases Matthew uses come directly from the prophetic language of:

Daniel 12 – “sleepers of the dust”
Ezekiel 37 – “I will cause breath to enter you, and you will come to life.”
Isaiah 26 – “Your dead will live… they will rise.”
Hosea 6 – “He will raise us up, and we will live before him.”

In Hebrew thought, these phrases describe:

spiritual awakening,
national revival,
renewal of hope,
restoration of covenant faithfulness,
the heart turning back to God.

Matthew uses the same prophetic vocabulary.
His Hebrew readers understood the meaning:
a spiritual awakening was taking place in the hearts of those who witnessed Jesus’ death.

Luke’s account fits perfectly.
He records that the crowds “began beating their breasts”—the physical expression of deep repentance.
Luke, writing in Greek, cannot reproduce Matthew’s symbolic Hebrew language.
Instead, he gives us the outward signs.

Matthew gives us the inner meaning.

8. Why This Matters for Understanding Spiritual Awakening Today

Matthew’s Hebrew way of writing aligns exactly with what we experience ourselves. When hearts awaken—when the inner rooms of the heart are touched—there is no need for outward spectacle. The resurrection happens inside.

In our own journey, we have experienced this inner resurrection.
We have seen it in others.
And we are now witnessing it again in the brothers and sisters whose hearts ignite when the Scriptures are fully opened, as Jesus opened them to the disciples on the road to Emmaus.

Matthew wrote his Gospel in the same spirit.
He wrote for hearts that were ready to burn.

Conclusion

Matthew is not merely one Gospel among four.
It is the Gospel written for the Hebrew heart—for those who hear the pulse of the prophets, who understand symbolic resurrection language, and who recognize the Messiah not only in miracles but in patterns, parallels, and prophetic fulfillment.

When Matthew describes tombs opening and holy ones awakening, he is not confusing us.
He is speaking in the language of Daniel and Ezekiel.
He is describing hearts stirred awake at the moment the veil was torn.
He is painting the first strokes of the resurrection that continues in the lives of all who allow Jehovah to enter the inner room of their hearts.

Matthew wrote the Gospel of awakening.
And when we listen with Hebrew ears, we hear its message clearly.

Chapter 5

Ancient and Modern Translations as Witnesses to

Matthew’s Prophetic Language (Matthew 27:52, 53)

“And the tombs were opened, and many bodies of the holy ones who had fallen asleep were raised up; and people coming out from among the tombs after his being raised up entered into the holy city, and they became visible to many people.”— Matthew 27:52, 53, NWT

In this chapter I am not trying to solve every detail of the text. Instead, I want to ask: What do the ancient and modern translations themselves allow—or even suggest—about a symbolic, prophetic reading of this passage? When we look carefully, we can see that the wording of Matthew 27:52, 53 in Greek and in the early versions leaves real room for understanding this as a picture of awakening rather than a simple report about corpses.

1. The Greek Text: “Bodies” and “Being Raised”

The key Greek phrase is:

πολλὰ σώματα τῶν κεκοιμημένων ἁγίων ἠγέρθησαν
“many sōmata of the hagioi who had fallen asleep were ēgerthēsan” (Matthew 27:52)

A few basic observations:

“Bodies” (sōmata)
- In Greek, sōma can mean the physical body, but it is also used for the person as a whole (“present your bodies as a living sacrifice” — Romans 12:1), or even for a corporate body (“the body of the Christ” — 1 Corinthians 12:27).
- So the phrase “many bodies of the holy ones” can also naturally be heard as “many persons, many lives of the holy ones.”

“Had fallen asleep”
- “Sleep” is a familiar biblical expression for death, but it is also the regular way of speaking about spiritual dullness or lack of alertness. (Compare Ephesians 5:14; 1 Thessalonians 5:6.)

“Were raised up” (ēgerthēsan)
- This same verb can mean “to raise from the dead,” but also simply “to wake up,” “to rouse,” or “to stir up.”

So, even before we look at translations, the Greek text itself is open to a reading where Matthew is describing the holy ones as awakened—their lives stirred, their hearts roused—under the impact of Jesus’ death and resurrection.

2. Ancient Translations: How Did the Earliest Readers Hear This?

2.1 Syriac Versions

Very early on, Matthew’s Gospel was translated into Syriac, a Semitic language close to Aramaic, the language Jesus and many early believers spoke. The Peshitta and the older Syriac witnesses all keep the basic structure but express it in Semitic terms. A typical line reads roughly:

“The tombs were opened, and the bodies of many holy ones who were sleeping arose, and after his resurrection they came out and appeared to many.”

Notice:

“Sleeping” and “arose” are exactly the familiar prophetic verbs used for spiritual awakening.
“Appeared” (or “were seen”) is a passive form meaning “became visible / became manifest,” which fits both an actual appearance and a spiritual coming into view in the consciousness of God’s people.
The Syriac translators do not expand the text into any description of wandering corpses. They simply preserve Matthew’s compact, symbolic wording.

2.2 Latin Tradition

The Old Latin and later Jerome’s Vulgate keep the structure:

The “tombs were opened.”
“Bodies of many holy ones” “rose” and “appeared to many.”

Again, the key verbs are those normally used for resurrection and revelation, but nothing in the Latin demands the picture of exposed, hopeless corpses. The Latin translators simply follow the Greek.

2.3 Coptic and Other Eastern Versions

Early Coptic translations (Sahidic and Bohairic), as well as Armenian, Georgian, and Ethiopic, all preserve the same compact schema:

tombs opened
holy ones “arose”
they “entered” the city
they “appeared to many”

These ancient translators clearly understood Matthew’s language as belonging to the resurrection and apocalyptic vocabulary of Scripture (compare Ezekiel 37; Daniel 12; Isaiah 26), not as a long newspaper story about decaying bodies.

In other words, the earliest translations do not lock us into the image of earthquake-tossed corpses. They keep the door open to the prophetic-symbolic side of Matthew’s language.

3. Modern Translations: Literal Rendering, but Symbolic Space

Most modern English translations follow a fairly literal pattern:

“The tombs were opened, and the bodies of many saints [or holy people] who had fallen asleep were raised.”

This includes translations like NIV, ESV, NASB, NRSV, and many others. Their choice is to mirror the Greek phrase closely, not to reinterpret it.

However, a few modern versions soften or shift the focus in a way that highlights people rather than physical remains:

Some translations speak of “many holy people who had died” being raised, without using the word “bodies”
Dynamic translations like Good News Translation and The Passion Translation talk about “holy ones who had died” being brought back to life and coming out of their graves, which concentrates the reader’s attention on the persons and their appearance, not on lifeless flesh.

In Hebrew, a modern translation of Matthew 27:52 reads:

“The tombs were opened, and many gufot (bodies) of kedoshim (holy ones) who were ‘sleepers of dust’ were awakened.”

Here the Hebrew expression “sleepers of dust were awakened” clearly echoes Daniel 12:2 (“many of those asleep in the dust of the earth will wake up”), which is itself symbolic resurrection language.

So even where “bodies” is retained, the surrounding wording (sleepers, dust, awakened, appeared) strongly belongs to the prophetic awakening vocabulary.

4. Modern Discussion: Recognizing Prophetic and Apocalyptic Style

Because of this background, some modern scholars openly acknowledge that Matthew 27:52, 53 can be read as apocalyptic-symbolic language:

Some interpreters point out that the sequence—earthquake, splitting rocks, opening tombs, holy ones raised and seen—matches the symbolic patterns of Ezekiel 37 (opened graves and revived people) and Daniel 12 (those sleeping in the dust waking up).
Others see these verses as Matthew’s theological commentary on the meaning of Jesus’ death and resurrection, highlighting the new creation and the spiritual revival of God’s people.

Even writers who personally favor a literal, physical resurrection of some saints often recognize a secondary symbolic layer, where the opening of the graves points to the opening of hope, and the appearing of the holy ones points forward to the final resurrection.

Jehovah’s Witnesses publications have also treated the account with care, emphasizing that Matthew speaks of bodies rather than simply “holy ones” and suggesting that the earthquake may have exposed corpses in opened tombs as a sign, while the real liberation from death would come later through the resurrection that Jesus’ sacrifice makes possible.

So across modern scholarship you can see a spectrum:

some take the event as literal and unique,
some see a combination of history and apocalyptic-symbolic emphasis,
and some read it as primarily prophetic imagery, like Ezekiel’s valley of dry bones.

The important point for my argument is this: nothing in the wording of the ancient or modern translations makes a symbolic reading impossible. In fact, the vocabulary and the prophetic background invite it.

5. How This Supports a Reading of Spiritual Awakening

If we place Matthew 27:52, 53 in the stream of Hebrew prophetic imagery, this passage fits together naturally with texts like:

Ezekiel 37:12–14, where Jehovah promises to open the graves of his people and bring them out so that they may live and know Him;
Isaiah 26:19, where those lying in the dust are invited to awake and shout joyfully;
Daniel 12:2, where “many of those asleep in the dust of the earth will wake up,” some to everlasting life.

In this light, Matthew’s words may be understood as his prophetic interpretation of what Jesus’ death and resurrection actually did to the “holy ones”:

Their tombs (their previous condition, their hopelessness, their spiritual dullness) were symbolically opened.
Their bodies—their whole lives and persons—were awakened or raised up in a spiritual sense.
After Jesus’ resurrection, they “entered into the holy city and became visible to many,” in the sense that their new faith, their changed lives, and their bold witness made them stand out as people transformed by the risen Christ.

The early translations faithfully carry Matthew’s compact wording without forcing a detailed literal picture of corpses walking around Jerusalem for a short time. Modern translations, even when they retain “bodies,” usually preserve the same prophetic vocabulary of sleep, awakening, and appearing. And modern discussion increasingly recognizes that this passage speaks in the language of revelation and awakening, not only of anatomy.

For my own purposes, especially when thinking about resurrection as awakening of the heart, Matthew 27:52, 53 can be read as a powerful prophetic picture:

Jesus’ death tears the curtain, shakes the earth, opens the rocks and the tombs.
His resurrection begins a new creation in which holy ones are awakened, brought out of their former darkness, and made visible as living stones in God’s spiritual temple.

This does not deny that a future, literal resurrection will occur “in the last day.” It simply recognizes that, already in the first century, Jesus’ death and resurrection caused a spiritual resurrection among his holy ones—so deep that Matthew could only describe it using the strongest prophetic language that Hebrew ears knew: opened graves, awakened sleepers, and holy ones appearing in God’s city.

Matthew’s Prophetic Awakening and Its Echo in Revelation 20

When Matthew records that “the tombs were opened” and “many holy ones… were raised up” (Matthew 27:52, 53), he uses the strongest prophetic vocabulary available to a Hebrew mind — the same vocabulary that appears in Ezekiel 37, Isaiah 26, Daniel 12, and ultimately reaches its climax in Revelation 20. Matthew’s description is not simply an isolated curiosity. It forms the first ripple of the same resurrection theme that Revelation later unfolds fully.

1. Matthew’s Language: Awakening, Opening, Appearing

Matthew’s four verbs create a complete sequence:

the tombs were opened
the holy ones were raised (awakened)
they came out
they became visible

This is the exact prophetic pattern used in Ezekiel 37 (“I will open your graves… you will come out… you will live… and you will know that I am Jehovah”), Daniel 12 (“those asleep in the dust will wake up”), and Isaiah 26 (“awake and cry out joyfully, you who dwell in the dust!”).

Matthew’s audience — Jewish, Hebrew-thinking believers — would immediately hear this resurrective pattern as spiritual awakening made visible in real people.

2. Revelation 20: The Final Form of the Same Pattern

Revelation 20 gives the ultimate expansion of this same four-step spiritual sequence. Notice the parallels:

A. “The rest of the dead came to life” (Rev. 20:5)

Here “coming to life” is not simply breathing again. It represents a transition from spiritual death into spiritual life — an awakening to righteousness, understanding, accountability, and transformation.

This is the same awakening vocabulary Matthew uses:
“holy ones… were raised up.”

B. “Blessed and holy is the one who has part in the first resurrection” (Rev. 20:6)

John calls them holy — exactly Matthew’s term (“many holy ones were raised”).

In both texts:

the “holy ones” awaken
the awakening marks them as belonging to God
their awakening makes them visible as witnesses

Matthew shows the beginning of this reality immediately after Jesus’ resurrection.
Revelation shows its completion at the end of the thousand years.

C. “Books were opened” (Rev. 20:12)

Matthew: “The tombs were opened.”
Revelation: “The books were opened.”

These are parallel metaphors:

opened tombs → awakening of people
opened books → awakening of understanding

Both symbolically describe the same divine act:
Jehovah removes obstacles and calls the dead to awareness, memory, and transformation.

D. “They stood before the throne” (Rev. 20:12)

Matthew: the awakened “entered the holy city and became visible.”
Revelation: the awakened “stand before God.”

Both scenes involve a once-hidden group becoming visible, recognizable, accountable, and alive in a new sense.

Matthew shows it in miniature.
Revelation shows it universalized.

3. Matthew as the Prototype; Revelation as the Full Vision

Matthew reports a first-century spiritual awakening triggered by Jesus’ death:

Earth shakes
Curtain tears
Tombs open
Holy ones awaken and appear

Revelation 20 reports the final awakening of humanity triggered by Jesus’ completed kingdom:

Satan restrained
The dead awakened
Books opened
Holy ones vindicated
All stand before God’s throne

Matthew’s event is local, symbolic, concentrated, and happens among the first believers.
Revelation’s is global, universal, final, and happens among all mankind.

Yet the structure is the same because the Author is the same.

4. Why Matthew’s Hebrew Ears Could Hear Revelation’s Pattern Early

When Matthew wrote his Gospel originally in Hebrew, his readers knew the prophetic pattern:

“opened tombs” = God is acting
“awakened sleepers” = spiritual illumination
“holy ones appearing” = prophetic restoration
“entering the city” = becoming part of God’s visible people

This is the same pattern Revelation 20 later uses for:

the “first resurrection” of Christ’s holy ones
the post-Millennial awakening of the “rest of the dead”

In other words:

Matthew writes the first sign of the new age.

Revelation writes its final fulfillment.

Matthew 27:52–53 is the seed.
Revelation 20 is the mature tree.

5. How Jesus’ Death and Resurrection Fit Both Texts

Matthew’s holy ones “raised” at Jesus’ death connect to:

Ephesians 2:5–6: “He made us alive… and raised us up… and seated us in heavenly places.”
Colossians 2:12–13: “He made you alive.”
Romans 6:4–5: “We were raised up with him.”
1 Thessalonians 4: resurrection depends on Christ’s presence.
Revelation 20: resurrection language applied to holy ones and later all mankind.

The Bible uses the same vocabulary — awake, raise, open, appear — as the technical language of spiritual transformation.

Matthew is the first example; Revelation is the consummation.

Conclusion: Matthew 27 and Revelation 20 Are Two Panels of the Same Painting

Matthew 27:52–53 is not a bizarre isolated miracle of flying corpses.
It is a prophetic snapshot of what Jesus’ death immediately produced in the hearts of his holy ones:

awakening
illumination
repentance
bold appearance
entry into God’s holy city

Revelation 20 reveals the same pattern as global and universal:

books opened
dead awakened
holy ones blessed
humanity standing before God
life emerging out of every grave

Matthew shows the first resurrection in miniature.
Revelation shows it in full cosmic scale.

And both rest on the same unshakeable truth:

When the Lamb conquers death, graves — literal or symbolic — cannot stay closed.

Awakening is inevitable.

Chapter 6

Opened Tombs and Opened Hearts — Matthew 27:52, 53

in Light of Spiritual Resurrection (Jehovah’s Witnesses Perspective)

Jehovah’s Witnesses have studied this passage carefully and consistently across decades. When the Scriptures are read through the lens of our published explanation—combined with the prophetic background found in Ezekiel and the spiritual revival described in "Pure Worship of Jehovah—Restored At Last!"—a clear, dignified picture emerges.

Although JW.org provides many deeply instructive articles, videos, and research materials that discuss the spiritual awakening of Jesus’ disciples after his resurrection, none of our publications interpret Matthew 27:52–53 in the specific manner presented in this chapter. The Governing Body and the publications of the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society do not apply this passage as a description of the apostles’ spiritual revival, nor do they place the events of 33 C.E. alongside 537 B.C.E. or 1919 C.E. as part of a prophetic timetable.

Therefore, what I present here must not be understood as a quotation, extension, or reinterpretation of anything published by the Faithful Slave.

My conclusion is simply a personal scriptural meditation, drawn from principles I learned through decades of studying the Bible with the help of Jehovah’s Witnesses. If any spiritual connection or pattern appears in this discussion, I give full credit to the faithful channel Jehovah uses today for teaching me the biblical foundations that make such reasoning possible.

And if the Governing Body or the Watch Tower Society were ever to indicate that my approach here is mistaken or unsuitable, I want it clearly understood that I do not claim their authority for this interpretation. My intention is not to teach doctrine or propose new understanding, but only to reflect appreciatively on scriptural patterns that harmonize with what I have learned from Jehovah’s organization.

1. What Matthew Says — and What He Does Not Say

Matthew 27:52 does not say that any holy ones were resurrected.
Jehovah’s Witnesses have emphasized this point repeatedly.

The Watchtower of October 15, 1975 (Questions From Readers) explains that Matthew’s wording mentions “bodies of the holy ones,” not that these individuals were raised to life.
The Watchtower of September 1, 1990 similarly states that Matthew does not describe a resurrection. Instead, it suggests that the earthquake accompanying Jesus’ death likely opened tombs and exposed corpses—a shocking sign but not a resurrection.
Insight on the Scriptures, Volume 2, commenting on “memorial tomb,” confirms the same view: nothing in the account indicates that these individuals were restored to life, and the wording can refer to tombs broken open.

The consistent conclusion:
Jehovah’s Witnesses do not teach that any resurrection occurred at Jesus’ death.

This is also in harmony with the Scriptural fact that Jesus is “the firstborn from the dead” (Col. 1:18) and the firstfruits of those who are resurrected (1 Cor. 15:20). No faithful ones could precede him.

See:

This interpretation aligns with a firm biblical truth:

Jesus is “the firstborn from the dead” (Col. 1:18). Therefore, no one else could be resurrected before him.

Jehovah’s Witnesses publications keep the interpretation simple and balanced: the event was dramatic, but it involved opened graves, not living saints.

2. "Pure Worship": The Pattern of Spiritual Resurrection

While "Pure Worship of Jehovah—Restored At Last!" does not comment directly on Matthew 27:52, 53, it provides essential background for how Israel understood “opened graves” in prophetic literature.

A. The People Were Spiritually Dead

Pure Worship Chapter 10 states:

“Jehovah’s people were in a spiritually lifeless condition, as if they were a valley full of dry bones.”

B. Their Return From Babylon Was a Spiritual Resurrection

Quoting Ezekiel 37, the book explains:

“Jehovah revived his people spiritually after their release from Babylon.”

Dry bones came to life—not literally, but symbolically—representing a national awakening, a revival of worship, purpose, and identity.

C. A Modern Parallel After 1914–1919

"Pure Worship" explicitly draws the connection:

“In modern times, God’s people experienced a similar reviving when they were freed from bondage to Babylon the Great.”

Thus, Jehovah’s Witnesses understand that:

537 B.C.E. → spiritual resurrection of the nation
1919 C.E. → spiritual resurrection of Jehovah’s people
both representing Jehovah’s ability to bring His people “up out of graves” in a figurative sense

This prophetic background forms a powerful framework for understanding Matthew’s language.

3. How This Helps Us Read Matthew 27:52, 53

Jehovah’s Witnesses do not say that Matthew meant Ezekiel’s vision.
But our publications show a consistent pattern in the Bible:

graves opening
dry bones being revived
people being restored from a dead condition
Jehovah awakening His people spiritually

This pattern helps us understand that the dramatic language in Matthew:

need not imply literal resurrection
is consistent with Hebrew prophetic style
fits the Watchtower conclusion that only tombs were opened
and does not conflict with Christ being the “firstborn from the dead”

Jehovah’s Witnesses therefore understand Matthew 27:52–53 in a dignified, Scriptural way:

Tombs opened = physical effect of the earthquake
Bodies exposed = visible sign of Jesus’ sacrificial death
No resurrection = harmony with all other Scriptures
Meaning = highlighting the significance of Christ’s death

This is the balanced, publication-supported understanding held by Jehovah’s Witnesses.

4. The Spiritual Revival of Jesus’ Disciples — A Resurrection of the Heart

Although Jehovah’s Witnesses have many excellent articles explaining the resurrection of Jesus Christ, one of the most powerful presentations of the inner transformation—the spiritual revival—experienced by the first-century disciples is found in this short video:

https://www.jw.org/finder?srcid=jwlshare&wtlocale=E&lank=pub-jwbvod25_31_VIDEO

When the resurrected Christ appeared to his followers, they did not merely witness a miracle; they underwent a profound awakening. Their fear turned to courage, their confusion to certainty, and their grief to unshakable joy. This spiritual restoration stands at the very heart of early Christianity. It parallels the prophetic pattern of resurrection seen in Ezekiel’s visions and reflects the same kind of spiritual revival that Jehovah’s people experienced again in modern times.

Before Jesus Appeared to Them

Jehovah’s Witnesses publications describe the disciples’ emotional state:

Peter was crushed by guilt.
Thomas was immobilized by doubt.
Mary Magdalene was overwhelmed with grief.
The Emmaus disciples walked “downcast,” unable to recognize the meaning of events.
The apostles hid behind locked doors for fear of the authorities.

Their condition—alive physically, but crushed spiritually.

When Jesus Revealed Himself

The revival that followed was extraordinary:

Mary’s sorrow turned to joy.
Thomas’ doubt turned to conviction.
Peter’s shame turned to strength.
The Emmaus disciples felt their hearts “burning” as Jesus opened the Scriptures.
The apostles became bold proclaimers of Christ’s resurrection.

Jehovah revived them—not physically, but spiritually, restoring their faith, courage, and purpose.

A Resurrection Greater Than Any Before

The return of Israel in 537 B.C.E. was a national revival.
The restoration of Jehovah’s people in 1919 was a revival of pure worship.

But the revival in 33 C.E. was more personal, more intimate, more transformative:

Jesus himself revived his disciples one by one.

Their hearts were raised up from despair into living hope.
Their minds awakened from confusion into clarity.
Their purpose rose from silence into preaching.

This spiritual resurrection is the living counterpart to the imagery in Matthew 27:52, 53—not literal bodies walking, but holy ones awakened by the risen Christ.

5. A Unified Picture in Harmony With JW Doctrine

When all the strands of Jehovah’s Witnesses teaching are brought together, a harmonious pattern emerges:

No physical resurrection occurred at Jesus’ death; tombs were opened by the earthquake.
Matthew’s wording exposed many dead saints.
Jesus remained the firstborn from the dead.
Ezekiel’s “opened graves” prefigure spiritual revival, not literal resurrection.
Jehovah revived His people in 537 B.C.E. and again in 1919 C.E.
The disciples experienced a powerful spiritual resurrection when Jesus appeared to them.
The imagery in Matthew fits the prophetic pattern of Jehovah opening the way for spiritual life.

Thus, Matthew 27:52, 53 is not about corpses walking, but about the profound effects of Jesus’ death—effects that touched the earth physically, shook the temple worship system, and opened the way for the greatest spiritual revival in human history.

Chapter 7

The Prophetic Language of Awakening:

How the Scriptures Prepare Us for Matthew’s Vision

1. Resurrection in Hebrew Thought: More Than Returning to Life

The Hebrew Scriptures rarely use “resurrection” to describe dead bodies returning to physical life.
Instead, they use the language of:

awakening
standing up
rising from dust
being revived
living again
being restored
turning from darkness to light

These are spiritual transformations, not anatomical events.

For Matthew’s Jewish readers, this prophetic vocabulary was familiar and powerful.
It shaped how they understood the Messiah, the Kingdom, and the new creation.

To read Matthew 27:52–53 properly, we must first hear the prophetic tones he is invoking.

2. Daniel 12:2 — “Many Who Sleep in the Dust Will Wake Up”

This is the most direct parallel to Matthew 27:52.

Daniel describes:

“Many of those asleep in the dust of the earth will wake up…”

To Hebrew ears, this is the language of:

spiritual stirring
moral awakening
restoration of God’s people
light breaking through darkness

Instead of treating these ideas as unrelated, it is helpful to acknowledge something essential: Daniel’s prophecy offers a clear hope of literal resurrection—of physical bodies restored from actual dust. Yet Daniel’s book is also filled with symbolic imagery: beasts, horns, kings, time periods, and heavenly court scenes. Within such a book, the phrase “many of those asleep in the dust of the earth will wake up” (Daniel 12:2) can carry a dual resonance—literal, yes, but also profoundly symbolic.

In the same way, Matthew writes with a mind trained by the Hebrew Scriptures. He records Jesus’ teachings with an awareness of both spiritual resurrection for the living and resurrection hope for the dead. His Gospel resonates with Ezekiel, Isaiah, and Daniel.

Because of that, I would not be surprised if Matthew, under inspiration, intended his readers to perceive Daniel’s words in a fresh light—especially in connection with what happened after Jesus’ resurrection. When he describes “holy ones” being raised and becoming visible after Christ’s victory over death, Matthew may be signaling that Daniel’s prophecy has a spiritual fulfillment unfolding right in front of the disciples’ eyes.

The physical resurrection remains certain and future.

But the awakening Daniel foresaw—the rising of people from dust-like spiritual condition—was already beginning in Jerusalem the moment the Messiah rose.

3. Isaiah 26:19 — “Your Dead Will Live… Awake and Shout Joyfully!”

Isaiah speaks in poetry and prophetic metaphor:

“Your dead will live.
My corpses will rise.
Awake and cry out joyfully…”

Again, this is language of:

renewal
spiritual return
restoration after judgment
the dawn of God’s favor

In Isaiah’s time, no literal resurrection followed these words.
Instead, a spiritual revival came after exile.

Matthew’s readers understood this sort of language intuitively.

4. Ezekiel 37 — The Valley of Dry Bones

No passage is more explicit.

Ezekiel sees:

bones
sinews
flesh
breath
standing up

Pure Worship establishes:

Ezekiel’s “opened graves” = symbolic awakening
Dry bones = people spiritually dead
Breath/spirit = spiritual revival
Release from Babylon = spiritual resurrection, not literal
Modern deliverance after 1914 = spiritual resurrection again

But Jehovah interprets it:

“These bones are the whole house of Israel…
I will open your graves and bring you up from them.”

Not physical resurrection, but:

national revival
return from captivity
restoration of true worship
spiritual reanimation

Matthew’s language about “holy ones raised” draws from this imagery perfectly.

5. Hosea 6:2 — “On the Third Day He Will Raise Us Up.”

This passage is astonishing in connection with Matthew 27:53.

Hosea says:

“He will revive us…
On the third day He will raise us up,
And we will live before Him.”

Hosea is not describing literal dead bodies.

He is describing:

repentance
spiritual healing
restored relationship with God
renewed life

For Hebrew minds, “raised on the third day” meant the moment of spiritual renewal after divine discipline.

Matthew’s note that “they entered the holy city after His being raised up” resonates directly with Hosea’s prophecy.

6. Jesus’ Teachings: Awakening Out of Spiritual Sleep

Jesus consistently uses resurrection language spiritually, even before His own death.

John 5:25 “The hour is coming, and it is now, when the dead will hear the voice of the Son of God, and those who have listened will live.”

This describes:

spiritual deadness
awakening to faith
recognizing Jesus’ identity

Not literal resurrection.

Matthew 23:27. Jesus calls the religious leaders: “whitewashed graves.”

Not because they are literal tombs,
but because they are spiritually dead.

Matthew 25:5–7. The virgins “fell asleep” and later “awoke.”

A metaphor for spiritual alertness.

Luke 15 (Prodigal Son). The father says: “This son of mine was dead and came to life.”

Again, spiritual, not physical.

Jesus trains His disciples to understand resurrection first as awakening,
then as physical reality.

7. Paul’s Voice: “You Were Raised Up with Christ.”

Paul does not treat resurrection only as a future event.

He describes resurrection as something a Christian already experiences:

Ephesians 2:4–6

“When we were dead in our trespasses,
He made us alive…
and raised us up and seated us in the heavenly places in union with Christ.”

This echoes Matthew’s description of “holy ones raised”:

spiritual position
new identity
new perception
new standing before God

Colossians 3:1

“If you were raised up with the Christ,
seek the things above.”

Paul says Christians are raised now, in their spirit and perception.

8. The Awakening of the First-Century Anointed

The disciples’ transformation between:

the despair of Nisan 14
the silence of the Great Sabbath
and the dawn of the third day

is the most powerful spiritual resurrection in the Scriptures.

They go from:

fear → boldness
confusion → clarity
despair → joy
silence → proclamation
hiddenness → visibility

Exactly what Matthew means:

“After His being raised up,
they entered into the holy city
and became visible to many.”

Their appearance is not the reporting of news.
It is the revelation of awakened hearts.

The “holy ones” who rise are:

the faithful disciples
those who loved Jesus
those whose hearts were shaken by His death
those who recognized His resurrection
those who stepped forward in public faith

9. Matthew’s Literary Genius: The Earthquake That Opens Hearts

Matthew’s pairing of:

torn curtain
split rocks
opened tombs
and awakened disciples

is deliberate.

He is showing his readers:

When the Messiah dies, the whole world shakes —
but it is people, not graves,
who rise.

Matthew’s Gospel begins with:

a star rising
Gentiles awakened
prophecies fulfilled
a new king revealed

And it ends with:

the earth shaking
tombs opening
disciples rising
a new creation beginning

To Hebrew minds, this is a picture of the greatest spiritual resurrection since the days of the prophets.

The “holy ones” who appear in Jerusalem are not corpses shaken loose.

They are believers whose faith has awakened through the shock of the cross and the glory of the resurrection.

Later, John Described the Opposite Reaction in Human Hearts

In the book of Revelation, John shows what happens when hearts do not open.
He writes of another great earthquake — not at Jesus’ death, but at the opening of the sixth seal:

When the Lamb opens that seal:

the sun becomes black,
the moon turns blood-red,
the stars fall from heaven,
and the entire earth begins to shake.

But unlike in Matthew’s account,
no hearts open.

Instead, we read:

“The kings of the earth… hid themselves in caves
and said to the mountains and the rocks,
‘Fall over us and hide us from the face of the One seated on the throne.’”
—Revelation 6:12–17

The same God shakes the world—
but this time, fear closes the heart that should have opened.

Matthew shows an earthquake that awakens,
but John shows an earthquake that terrifies.

Matthew describes people stepping into the holy city,
John describes people hiding in caverns of darkness.

Both earthquakes come from God,
but the human response determines whether a person is raised
or buried deeper.

10. Conclusion: The Resurrection Already Begins in the Heart

The language of the prophets, the teaching of Jesus, the theology of Paul, and the narrative of Matthew all converge into a single truth:

Resurrection begins as awakening.
Physical resurrection is its final expression,
but spiritual resurrection is its first.
Matthew 27:52–53 is the moment the new creation erupts.
Not in the tombs.
But in the disciples.
Not in corpses.
But in hearts.
Not in the earth.
But in the holy ones called to stand with the risen Christ.
When He rises, they rise.

And Matthew, the most Hebrew of the Gospel writers, tells the story exactly as a Jew would:

by showing the earth tremble
and the faithful awaken
into the dawning light of the third day.

Chapter 8

The Sadducees’ Confusion: No Distinction Between Spiritual and Physical

The discussion about resurrection in Jesus’ day did not start with peaceful questions. It started with mockery.

The Sadducees—who said there is no resurrection—came to Jesus with a story that was meant to make the hope of resurrection look absurd. They described seven brothers. Each, in turn, married the same woman after the previous brother died, in harmony with the levirate law of Moses. None of them produced a child. Finally the woman herself died.

Then they asked: “In the resurrection, of the seven, whose wife will she be?”

To them, this was a logical trap. If resurrection is just a re-start of the same earthly arrangement, then the whole idea collapses into chaos. Their mistake was simple but deep: they only imagined resurrection as a physical continuation of this life—same bodies, same bonds, same problems—just moved into another age.

Jesus’ reply cut through their whole framework in one sentence:

“You are mistaken, because you know neither the Scriptures nor the power of God.”

Two things they did not know:

The Scriptures – what Moses and the Prophets actually taught about life from the dead.
The power of God – that resurrection is not just “more of the same,” but a new kind of life that begins spiritually before it ever appears physically.

Then Jesus did two things:

He corrected their picture of resurrection:
“In the resurrection, neither do men marry nor are women given in marriage, but are like angels in heaven.”
He corrected their use of Moses’ writings:
He reminded them that Jehovah calls himself “the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob” and concluded: “He is a God, not of the dead, but of the living.”

Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob were physically dead.

Yet to Jehovah they are living—because His purpose has never been interrupted. Resurrected life starts in God’s purpose and power before it appears in human eyes.

The Sadducees had no category for that.
To them, if there was no physical body standing in front of you, there was nothing.
They had no distinction between spiritual resurrection and physical resurrection. That was the root of their confusion.

What Moses and the Prophets Really Said About Resurrection

Yet the Hebrew Scriptures had already prepared a very rich picture of resurrection:

Isaiah 26: “Your dead will live… Awake and cry out joyfully, you who dwell in the dust!” Then: “Go, my people, enter your inner rooms… hide yourself for a brief moment until the indignation passes by.”
Here we see:
Awakening → entering inner rooms → surviving judgment.

Ezekiel 37: A valley of very dry bones. Jehovah says: “I will open your graves and bring you up out of them, my people.” The bones stand up as a large army—not because their skeletons are rearranged, but because spiritual hope and identity are restored to Israel.

Daniel 12: “Many of those asleep in the dust of the earth will wake up, some to everlasting life and others to reproach.” Here resurrection is directly linked to final discernment and judgment—two different outcomes.

Hosea 6: “He will revive us… On the third day he will raise us up, that we may live before him.” It is covenant language—return to God expressed in resurrection terms.

All these texts speak about:

graves opened
dust-dwellers awakened
people standing up
life being revived
judgment and separation following

But these images are not simply about bones and dust. They are prophetic patterns:

A people in covenant death → awakened by Jehovah’s word
Hearts in exile → brought back to His presence
A nation in spiritual burial → restored as a living community

In that sense, the first resurrection is always spiritual:

Jehovah calls, awakens, restores, and breathes life into a people before He transforms their bodies.

The Sadducees read Moses and the Prophets only as legal text and history, not as a living map of spiritual resurrection.

Jesus’ Teaching: Resurrection Begins in the Heart

Jesus’ response to the Sadducees was not isolated. His whole ministry was built on the same principle:

Two kinds of “dead”

“Let the dead bury their dead, but you go and declare the Kingdom of God.”
There are physically alive people whom Jesus still calls “dead.” This is spiritual death—hearts like sealed tombs.

Two stages of resurrection

In John chapter 5, Jesus explains:

“The hour is coming, and it is now, when the dead will hear the voice of the Son of God, and those who have listened will live.”
Later in the same passage he speaks of a future hour when “all those in the memorial tombs will hear his voice and come out.”

So:

There is a present, spiritual resurrection: the dead hear his voice now and live.
There is a future, physical resurrection: those in the memorial tombs come out.

Jesus also performed literal resurrections—Jairus’ daughter, the young man in Nain, Lazarus. These were real miracles but temporary; all those people died again. They were prophetic signs, not the final state.

The only resurrection that never reverses is:

Jesus’ own resurrection, as a spirit (he “was put to death in the flesh but made alive in the spirit”),
and the spiritual resurrection he begins in the hearts of those who listen to him.

He is “the resurrection and the life.”
Anyone who believes in him “has passed from death to life” already, in a spiritual sense, even before the physical resurrection.

This is exactly what the Sadducees did not understand when Jesus said, “You do not know the Scriptures nor the power of God.”

The Apostles: Spiritual Resurrection First, Then the Rest

Paul

Paul explains the order in 1 Corinthians 15:

“It is sown a physical body, it is raised a spiritual body.”
“The last Adam became a life-giving spirit.”
“Each one in his own order.”

For Paul:

We are made alive together with Christ now (Ephesians 2).
We are raised up with him and seated in the heavenly places.
Our baptism already pictures being buried and raised with Christ (Romans 6).

This is resurrection in advance—spiritual first. The physical resurrection at Christ’s presence is its completion, not its beginning.

Peter

Peter says we have been “given a new birth to a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ.” He also says Christ was “put to death in the flesh but made alive in the spirit.” The pattern remains: spirit-life first, then future glory.

John

John’s Gospel and letters underline:

Passing from death to life by believing in the Son.
Having “life in ourselves” by abiding in Christ.
The “first resurrection” in Revelation 20—a priestly, holy class who live and reign with Christ—before the rest of the dead come to life.

Together, Jesus, Paul, Peter, and John testify:

Resurrection begins as a spiritual awakening
and will be completed in physical restoration at Jehovah’s appointed time.

Matthew’s Hebrew Lens: Tombs Opened, Holy Ones Raised

Now we are ready to understand what Matthew, writing primarily for Jews familiar with Moses and the Prophets, is doing with his unique words in Matthew 27:52–53:

The earth shakes.
The rocks split.
The tombs are opened.
Many bodies of holy ones who had fallen asleep are “raised.”
After Jesus’ own resurrection, they “come out” and “become visible.”

If this were meant as a literal mass resurrection of corpses, marching into Jerusalem for a moment and then disappearing from all further Bible record:

It would contradict the pattern Jesus himself gave (spiritual first, then future general resurrection).
It would overshadow the uniqueness of Christ as “the firstfruits” of the resurrection.
It would confuse the whole dynamic of Jehovah’s purpose, which always begins with inner awakening, not a random display of bodies.

Instead, Matthew is using Hebrew prophetic language:

Opened tombs,
Awakened sleepers,
Raised holy ones,
Becoming visible to many,

to describe what Jesus’ death and resurrection did inside the first-century holy ones.

He is showing that the “tombs of their hearts” were cracked open.
The curtain was torn.
The inner Most Holy place became accessible.
Jehovah’s spirit could now dwell there.
The resurrection began in them.

Three Temples: How All of This Fits Together

To tie everything together, we distinguish three interacting spheres:

(1) Jehovah’s Great Spiritual Temple

The heavenly sanctuary where Jehovah dwells.
Christ appears as High Priest with his own blood.
This is the original Most Holy.

(2) Christ’s Collective Temple on Earth

Christ’s body of anointed ones.
The “seven stars” in his hand.
The “seven lampstands” representing congregations of holy ones (both anointed and “other sheep”).
This is the Holy Place of our time, where:
- light is given
- bread (God’s Word) is laid out
- Jesus walks among his people

Here is where spiritual resurrection is preached and nurtured.

(3) The Individual Heart as Inner Tent and Most Holy

Each believer’s heart becomes a tent where Jehovah may dwell.
Inside that tent, there is a personal Most Holy—
the deepest chamber of conscience, love, and truth.

Before Christ, that inner room was like a sealed tomb—
stone-hard, veiled, inaccessible.

When Jesus died:

The curtain tore from top to bottom.
The earth shook.
The rocks split.
The tombs opened.

Spiritually, this means:

The barriers in the heart can now be broken.
The inner Most Holy can be opened.
Jehovah can enter and dwell by His spirit.
The person can experience spiritual resurrection first.

The congregation (the Holy Place) is the sphere where Jesus walks among the lampstands, feeds with showbread, and holds the stars. Only by moving within this illuminated space do individuals receive enough light and nourishment to have their inner tombs cracked and their heart’s curtain torn.

Why a Literal Mass Resurrection at Jesus’ Death Would Break the Pattern

If we insist that Matthew 27:52–53 describes a literal crowd of resurrected corpses entering Jerusalem:

We blur the line between signs and the real thing.
We contradict Jesus’ own description of the resurrection order.
We move the final pattern of resurrection before the spiritual temple is even understood.
We ignore the whole spiritual logic Jesus explained to the Sadducees:
that those who rise are in a different mode of existence, not simply a continuation of earthly family arrangements.

But if we see Matthew’s language as Hebrew prophetic description of spiritual resurrection:

The Scriptures and the power of God become harmonious.
Jesus’ own teaching stands intact.
Paul, Peter, John, and Revelation all line up.
The three-temple structure (heavenly, congregational, personal) becomes clear.
We see that Jehovah’s purpose is to awaken hearts first, then bodies.

Final Thought

The Sadducees mocked resurrection because they only saw bodies.
Jesus corrected them because he saw hearts, Scriptures, and the power of God.

Matthew, writing to readers steeped in Moses and the Prophets, uses the language of opened tombs and raised holy ones to show that with Christ’s death and resurrection, the real work began:

the cracking of the tombs of the heart,
the tearing of the inner curtain,
the opening of the Most Holy place inside us,

so that Jehovah can dwell there—
and from that inner resurrection,
the future resurrection of all mankind can unfold in perfect order.

Chapter 9

The Three Spheres of Jehovah’s Temple and the Opening of the Heart

Understanding the meaning of Matthew 27:52–53, and how Christ’s death “opens the tombs of the heart,” requires a careful distinction between three levels of the spiritual temple arrangement described in Scripture. These three spheres are not symbolic inventions — they are plainly presented in the Bible, each with its own role and each interacting with the others.

There is:

Jehovah’s Great Spiritual Temple — the heavenly realm of His presence
Christ’s Collective Temple — the anointed, the congregations, the lampstands
The Individual Heart — the inner tent, the personal Most Holy

Each level is real.
Each level has its own holiness.
And Christ’s death and resurrection open access across all three.

Let us examine them in their order.

1. Jehovah’s Great Spiritual Temple — The Realm of God’s Presence

This is the highest and original temple — not made with hands, not earthly, not symbolic. It is where Jehovah Himself resides in glory.

Scripture reveals this realm progressively:

Isaiah 6 — Jehovah enthroned, seraphs calling “holy, holy, holy”
Daniel 7 — “the Ancient of Days,” thrones, heavenly court
Hebrews 8–10 — Christ entering the “greater and more perfect tent”
Revelation 11; 21 — the ark seen, the temple opened, God dwelling with mankind

Here:

Jehovah resides
Christ serves as High Priest
The ark symbolizes His justice and presence
Angels function like priestly attendants
The Most Holy is real, perfect, and heavenly

This spiritual temple is not the congregation.
It is the source of all life, holiness, and authority.

Christ entered this temple “with his own blood” (Heb. 9:11–12).
Only because he stands in this highest sanctuary can he mediate, teach, and give spiritual life.

Everything below derives from this upper reality.

2. Christ’s Body as the Collective Temple — the Holy Place of the Congregations

The second sphere is Christ’s extended temple on earth — his priestly body and its visible expression in Christian congregations.

This sphere includes:

the anointed, built on Christ the cornerstone (1 Cor. 3:16; Eph. 2:20–22)
the seven stars in Christ’s right hand (Rev. 1:16, 20)
the seven lampstands, the congregations (Rev. 1:12–13, 20)

In this sphere:

Christ walks among the congregations
He is pictured in the Holy Place, not behind the curtain
He inspects, strengthens, and shepherds his people
Spiritual illumination and nourishment are given continually

The elements of the Holy Place reappear here in spiritual form:

The Lampstands — Congregations

They shine spiritual light for all who enter.

The Showbread — God’s Word

This is the spiritual nourishment shared and taught among Jehovah’s people.

The Seven Stars — Oversight and Shepherding

Christ holds these in his right hand, showing direct support of spiritual shepherds.

This sphere — Christ walking among the congregations — is the living Holy Place in our time. Here:

insight is given
hearts are instructed
faith is nourished
worship rises like incense
and spiritual senses awaken

This collective Holy Place is the pathway for individuals to draw near to Jehovah.
It is the inner room of shared worship, extended like a sacred canopy ("For he will hide me in his shelter on the day of calamity; He will conceal me in the secret place of his tent; High on a rock he will place me" Ps. 27:5) over all who love Him.

3. The Individual Heart — The Inner Tent and the Most Holy Place

The third sphere is the most intimate: the human heart.

The Scriptures describe the heart using temple imagery:

a tent (2 Cor. 5:1–4)
an inner room where truth resides (Ps. 51:6; Prov. 20:27)
a secret place of Jehovah’s protection (Ps. 91:1)
a sanctuary where righteousness is practiced (Ps. 15:1–2)
a Most Holy, where Jehovah writes His law (Jer. 31:33)

The heart is the personal sanctuary where:

conscience speaks
motives are tested
truth is planted
repentance is born
intimacy with Jehovah becomes possible

But before Christ’s death, this inner room — the Most Holy of the heart — was sealed:

conscience veiled
fear acting like a curtain
guilt forming a thick partition
spiritual death turning the heart into a tomb

This brings us to Matthew’s imagery.

4. Christ’s Death Cracks the Tombs of the Heart

Matthew’s account is deliberately layered:

the curtain torn
the earth shaken
the rocks split
the tombs opened
“holy ones” raised
appearing to many after his resurrection

This is not only historical but profoundly symbolic.

It is a prophetic illustration of what Christ’s death accomplishes inside the individual:

The tomb of the heart cracks open.
The stone of dead faith is split.
The inner veil of guilt and fear tears apart.
The innermost sanctuary — the heart’s Most Holy — becomes open to Jehovah.

Human effort cannot open this chamber.
Only Christ can.

His death tears the curtain.
His resurrection raises the holy ones.
His spirit awakens the inner life.

This leads to the structure of access.

5. The Path of Access: From Heaven to Congregation to Heart

The three spheres form one unified arrangement.
Access to Jehovah moves in a sacred sequence.

A. From Jehovah’s Heavenly Temple

Christ receives:

priestly authority
life-giving power
the right to mediate access

B. Into the Collective Temple — the Congregations

Christ:

walks among the lampstands
shines spiritual light
feeds through God’s Word
supports shepherds held in his hand
oversees pure worship

Here the believer receives:

truth
guidance
correction
nourished faith
awakened conscience

C. Finally, Into the Individual Heart

As a result:

tombs crack
inner veils open
spiritual deadness dissolves
Jehovah dwells in the Most Holy of the heart

This is why:

No one enters the heart’s Most Holy place

without walking first through the Holy Place of congregational life.

Jehovah’s temple arrangement is unified, purposeful, and sacred.

Christ mediates.
The congregation illuminates.
The heart opens.
Jehovah dwells.

In One Sentence

Jehovah’s great spiritual temple empowers Christ;
Christ walks among the congregations to illuminate and nourish;
and through this holy place the tomb-like heart is cracked open,
the inner veil is torn,
and the Most Holy chamber of the individual becomes a dwelling place for Jehovah.

Chapter 10

Linguistic Framework of Heart, Stone, Tomb, Altar, Temple, and Kingdom

From Inner Capacity to Divine Rule and Resurrection

1. Heart — לֵב / לֵבָב (lêv / lêvāv)

Root and Sense

Root: ל־ב־ב
Meaning: the inner person—mind, will, understanding, moral discernment

In Biblical Hebrew, the heart is not primarily emotional. It is the seat of thinking, intention, and responsiveness to God. Scripture therefore speaks of the heart as capable of real conditions: alive, hardened, circumcised, dull, or stone-like.

“Heart of stone” — לֵב הָאֶבֶן (Ezekiel 36:26)

This is not metaphorical decoration. It describes an inner condition of resistance, where the capacity to hear and respond has ceased.

Function: determines life or death by response
Character: abstract, interior, living faculty

2. Stone — אֶבֶן (ʾeven)

Root and Sense

Root: א־ב־ן
Meaning: stone, rock, building material, weight

Stone in Scripture is linguistically neutral. Its meaning is determined by function, not substance.

Uses of Stone:

Uncut stones for altars
Pillars and heaps as covenant witnesses
Foundation stones
Law tablets
Tomb seals
Metaphor for resistance (“heart of stone”)

Stone is characterized by permanence, silence, and resistance to change. It can serve either as witness and foundation or as obstruction and silence.

3. Uncut Stones and the Altar — Divine Action Without Human Refinement

Jehovah commanded:

“If you make an altar of stones for me, you must not build it using cut stones.” (Exodus 20:25)

This instruction established a principle that governed Israel’s approach to Jehovah from early times. Altars of uncut stones existed before the Mosaic Law and continued to express the same truth under the Law: approach to God was not to be based on human craftsmanship, refinement, or improvement. Worship began with what Jehovah provided, not with what humans shaped.

Uncut stones therefore represent what is untouched by human manipulation. The altar served as a place of approach, reconciliation, and obedience, yet it did not effect an inward transformation of the heart. Fire placed upon such altars did not alter the stone itself; it acted upon the offering. The foundation remained unchanged. Divine action addressed what was presented, not the material base.

This limitation remained evident throughout Israel’s history. Even under the Law, with its detailed sacrificial system, the inner condition of humanity was not decisively altered. The heart of stone persisted. External arrangements regulated worship and managed sin, but they did not remove resistance within the inner person.

A notable shift begins to appear with David. Though David continued to worship within the same sacrificial framework, his anointing marked a new emphasis. Jehovah began to speak not only in terms of service, but of sonship:

“You are my son; today I have become your father.” (Psalm 2:7, NWT)

Here, the focus starts to move beyond altar and offering toward relationship and identity. This did not yet abolish the existing system, but it signaled that a deeper transformation was anticipated—one that the altar itself could not produce.

This transition becomes more visible in the days of Solomon. Scripture records that Solomon built a large copper altar for the temple courtyard:

“Then he made the copper altar, twenty cubits being its length, and twenty cubits its width, and ten cubits its height.”
(2 Chronicles 4:1, NWT)

The use of copper does not contradict the command regarding uncut stone altars, because this altar served a different function. It belonged to a centralized, priestly system established by divine instruction, designed for continual national sacrifices under the Law. The copper altar managed judgment and atonement publicly and repeatedly, but it remained an external arrangement.

At the same time, the temple itself was constructed from prepared stones, cut at the quarry and assembled in silence (1 Kings 6:7). This reflected a move from simple approach toward ordered dwelling, yet even this development did not transform the heart. The Law continued, sacrifices continued, and resistance within humanity remained.

Thus, from uncut stone altars, to the copper altar, to the carefully constructed temple, Scripture consistently shows that external worship arrangements—however divinely authorized—did not dramatically change the inner person. They provided access, order, and reconciliation, but they pointed forward to something greater.

At the same time, Scripture records the appearance of new symbolic elements in Solomon’s temple that had not been present in earlier worship arrangements. Among these are lilies and gourd- or pomegranate-shaped decorations, especially in connection with the pillars, the Sea, and the capitals (1 Kings 7:18–26; 2 Chronicles 4:5).

These elements do not alter the function of the altar or the sacrificial system, nor do they introduce a new means of atonement. Rather, they introduce imagery associated with life, beauty, fruitfulness, and abundance into the house of worship. This suggests that while the external system still could not transform the heart, Jehovah was gradually enriching the visual language of worship, pointing beyond regulation and judgment toward life and fullness.

The presence of lilies and fruit-like forms alongside stone, metal, and water signals anticipation rather than fulfillment. Worship was becoming more expressive, more suggestive of restoration and flourishing, yet the inner person remained unchanged. The heart of stone had not yet been removed.

In this way, the temple’s imagery quietly reinforces the same conclusion reached by the altar system itself: structure, beauty, and divine authorization alone do not produce inner transformation. They prepare expectation. They educate perception. They direct hope forward—toward a future work in which life would no longer be symbolized in stone and ornament, but would take root within the heart itself.

Only with Christ would the work move beyond altar and temple to the removal of the heart of stone itself, accomplishing what no external structure could achieve.

4. Covenant Stones — Witness and Boundary

In Genesis 31, Jacob and Laban erect a stone pillar and heap as a witness:

“Jacob then took a stone and set it up as a pillar.” (Genesis 31:45)

The stone marks boundary, peace, and reconciliation after conflict. It is not shaped, sacrificed upon, or idolized. It stands as silent testimony.

Stone here is not resistance, but memory and permanence.

5. Tomb — קֶבֶר / קְבוּרָה (qéver / qevuráh)

Root and Sense

Root: ק־ב־ר
Meaning: to bury, enclose, conceal

A tomb is a sealed space, defined by silence and non-response. It represents the outward expression of what a stone-like heart already is inwardly.

This is why resurrection language consistently involves:

opening,
calling,
hearing.

A tomb does not act. It waits.

6. Temple — בַּיִת / הֵיכָל (bayith / hêḵāl)

The temple is not a place of approach, like the altar, but a dwelling.

Stone use develops:

Stones are shaped, but outside the sacred space (1 Kings 6:7)
Assembly occurs in silence
Order replaces spontaneity

Stone is now structural, arranged according to divine pattern. Human preparation exists, but is restrained and subordinated to Jehovah’s design.

7. The Inner Room — דְּבִיר (dĕvîr)

The Most Holy represents presence, not activity.

Sealed
Restricted
Silent

Here stone reaches its highest function—not resistance, not witness, but stability for divine presence. Silence here is not death, but holiness.

8. Jehovah as Rock — Source of All Stability

Underlying all stone imagery is a foundational declaration:

“The Rock, perfect is his activity.” (Deuteronomy 32:4)

Jehovah is not merely compared to a rock; He is the source of permanence, faithfulness, and authority. All later stone imagery derives meaning from Him.

Jehovah as Rock explains why stone can signify:

refuge,
foundation,
resistance,
judgment,
permanence.

9. The Stone Cut From the Mountain — Daniel’s Kingdom Stone

Daniel introduces a decisive development:

“You saw a stone cut out, not by hands…” (Daniel 2:34)

This stone:

is not shaped by human hands
originates from a mountain (symbol of divine authority)
destroys human kingdoms
becomes a mountain filling the earth (Daniel 2:44)

This stone echoes:

uncut altar stones,
divine origin without human refinement,
permanence rooted in Jehovah.

It represents Jehovah’s Kingdom, not as reform, but as replacement.

10. Christ — The Rejected Stone and the Raised Temple

Jesus unites all prior stone imagery:

“The stone that the builders rejected has become the chief cornerstone.” (Matthew 21:42)

The rejection comes from builders—those responsible for construction. The stone is not flawed, but unmanageable by human standards.

Jesus then declares:

“Tear down this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.” (John 2:19)

John explains he was speaking of his body (John 2:21).

Here, stone, temple, tomb, and resurrection converge:

The temple is torn down (loosened, not erased)
The same reality is raised
Resurrection restores continuity

11. Peter (Cephas) and Living Stones

Jesus renames Simon:

“You are Peter [Petros], and on this rock [petra] I will build my congregation.” (Matthew 16:18)

Linguistically:

Petros / Cephas = stone
Petra = bedrock, mass

Peter is a stone, not the Rock.
Jehovah remains the Rock; Christ is the cornerstone.

Peter himself later clarifies:

“You yourselves as living stones are being built up into a spiritual house.” (1 Peter 2:5)

Believers are stones made alive, no longer silent, no longer sealed.

12. Resurrection — From Stone to Voice to Life

Across Scripture, the pattern is consistent:

Stone heart → no response
Sealed tomb → silence
Stone removed → voice heard
Resurrection → restored responsiveness

Resurrection is not relocation, but restored capacity to hear and respond, culminating in dwelling with Jehovah.

Final Synthesis

Scripture binds heart, stone, altar, temple, kingdom, and resurrection into one coherent theology:

Jehovah is the Rock
Christ is the rejected stone and raised temple
The Kingdom is the stone cut without hands
The heart decides life or death
The tomb suspends response
Resurrection restores continuity
Believers become living stones

From uncut stones in early worship to a mountain filling the earth, Jehovah’s purpose moves from stone to life—not by human shaping, but by divine voice and power.

Chapter 11

From Opened Tombs to Opened Mouths:

Matthew and Acts in One Continuous Story

Matthew’s Gospel does not end at the torn curtain and opened tombs. It moves immediately into a series of post-resurrection encounters that explain what those signs truly meant.

After Jesus is raised, Matthew records that:

doubt exists even among those who see him,
yet they are commissioned, strengthened, and sent.

This progression is crucial. Resurrection does not instantly produce perfection—it produces awakening.

Matthew’s earlier statement that “many bodies of the holy ones were raised” and that they “became visible to many in the holy city” finds its explanation not in a parade of resurrected corpses, but in what happens next: ordinary people, once frightened and silent, now appear openly, speak boldly, and act with conviction in Jerusalem.

Matthew’s readers—Hebrews who knew what happened at Passover in 33 C.E.—would recognize this immediately. Jerusalem was suddenly filled with witnesses. Voices that had been silent were now heard. Lives that had retreated into fear were now publicly visible.

Many of them either witnessed those days personally or had heard repeated firsthand accounts. For such readers, Matthew did not need to explain every detail. A single, carefully chosen phrase could carry immense meaning.

That is why Matthew’s statement that the raised holy ones “entered into the holy city and became visible to many” is so striking. To modern readers, it may seem brief or puzzling. To first-century Hebrews, it was a solid, loaded expression—one that immediately evoked memories of shaken consciences, public repentance, renewed faith, and courageous testimony that followed Jesus’ resurrection. Matthew is not introducing a new spectacle; he is naming a reality his readers already knew.

In Hebrew thought, visibility is not merely physical presence. It is recognition, manifestation, and public acknowledgment. When Matthew says these holy ones became visible in Jerusalem, he is pointing to a spiritual revelation that unfolded in the very heart of the city at Passover—the moment when resurrection power first began to reshape lives. One sentence was enough, because the event itself had already spoken loudly.

Thus, Matthew’s brief reference is not a lack of detail, but a mark of confidence: he is writing to those who understand that something irreversible happened in Jerusalem after the Messiah was raised—something no explanation could fully contain.

This is where Acts picks up the same story, told in a different language.

Acts: The Historical Outworking of Matthew’s Prophetic Scene

Luke, writing Acts, does not repeat Matthew’s imagery of opened tombs. Instead, he records what that imagery produced.

In Acts 1–5:

the disciples speak openly in Jerusalem,
they testify repeatedly to Jesus’ resurrection,
they refuse to be silenced,
they accept suffering with joy.

Luke shows the raised holy ones in motion.

What Matthew compresses into one prophetic sentence—“they became visible to many”—Luke expands into a historical record of public preaching, courageous testimony, and transformed conduct.

Matthew shows the moment of awakening.
Luke shows the life that follows awakening.

Post-Resurrection Appearances: Jesus Raises People Before Institutions

Matthew’s post-resurrection account highlights another key truth: Jesus does not immediately restore structures or institutions. He restores people.

He meets frightened disciples.
He reassures doubters.
He commissions learners, not heroes.

This matches Acts, where the power of resurrection is not displayed first through miracles or authority, but through changed hearts.

The resurrection of Jesus produces a resurrection of identity:

from followers to witnesses,
from fear to obedience,
from confusion to purpose.

This is the same resurrection Matthew signals at Jesus’ death—now fully unfolding.

Why One Phrase Was Enough for Matthew’s Readers

Matthew’s audience did not need a long explanation.

They lived in the city where:

the earth shook,
the curtain tore,
the city buzzed with testimony,
and faith ignited after the resurrection.

So Matthew could write, with deliberate restraint:

“They entered into the holy city and became visible to many.”

Acts shows who those people were.

One Resurrection, Two Voices

Matthew speaks as a prophet:

symbols,
echoes,
compressed meaning.

Luke speaks as a historian:

speeches,
trials,
daily life.

But they testify to the same truth:

Jesus’ resurrection did not merely open graves—it opened people.

And Jerusalem knew it.

Chapter 12

From Stone Heart to Living Stone: The Resurrection of the Inner Sanctuary

The Bible speaks of stone more than almost any other material.

It can be:

a symbol of deadness
a symbol of hardness
a symbol of strength
a symbol of permanence
a symbol of spiritual awakening

But nowhere is this contrast sharper than in the way Scripture describes the human heart.

From Genesis to Revelation, we watch a transformation unfold:

The heart begins as stone.
Christ cracks it open.
The spirit softens it.
Then Jehovah shapes the whole person into a living stone in His temple.

To understand spiritual resurrection—and the opening of the “tombs” of the heart—we must trace this theme carefully, starting where the Bible begins: the prophets of Israel.

1. The Stone-Heart in the Hebrew Scriptures

Before Jesus ever spoke of soils, seeds, lampstands, or inner rooms, the prophets had already declared that Israel’s greatest problem was not external—it was internal.

1.1 Ezekiel: The Heart of Stone

There are no clearer words in the Hebrew Scriptures than these:

“I will remove the heart of stone from their body and give them a heart of flesh.”— Ezek. 36:26

Here the metaphor is precise:

stone = dead, cold, unresponsive
flesh = warm, alive, responsive

Jehovah repeats the promise:

“I will remove the heart of stone… and give them a heart of flesh.”— Ezek. 11:19

This is the foundation of every later biblical teaching on spiritual awakening.

A stone-heart cannot:

feel
repent
listen
obey
trust
love
respond to Jehovah’s spirit

It is a heart sealed like a tomb.

1.2 Zechariah: The Diamond-Hard Heart

Zechariah intensifies the metaphor:

“They made their heart like a diamond-hard stone.”— Zech. 7:12

This is not merely “hard.”
It is unbreakable, impenetrable, untouched by mercy or truth.

1.3 Psalm 95 and the Wilderness Pattern

“Do not harden your hearts.”— Ps. 95:8

The hardened heart was the reason Israel failed in the wilderness.
A whole generation had hearts like stone.

1.4 Job: Stone as a Metaphor for Heartlessness

“His heart is hard as stone, hard as a lower millstone.”— Job 41:24

The metaphor was common:
when something could not feel, it was called stone-hearted.

2. Jesus: Stones, Soil, Tombs, and the Inner Room

By the time Jesus arrived, the language of stone-heartedness was deeply woven into Jewish thought.
Jesus expands, sharpens, and personalizes this imagery.

2.1 The Parable of the Sower — Stony Soil

Jesus describes a heart that responds quickly but shallowly:

“Some seed fell on rocky places… it had no depth… it withered.”— Matt. 13:5–6

This is the same prophetic diagnosis:

shallow heart
no capacity for roots
emotional response without spiritual transformation

It is a stone-heart in parable form.

2.2 Whitewashed Tombs — Beautiful Outside, Dead Inside

To the religious leaders:

“You are like whitewashed tombs… inside full of dead men’s bones.”— Matt. 23:27

This is the ultimate stone metaphor:

a human heart = a tomb
sealed
containing death
unclean
inaccessible

This becomes crucial later when Matthew describes the tombs opening at Christ’s death (Matt. 27:52–53).

2.3 “Clean the inside of the cup” — the inner sanctuary

“Clean first the inside… so the outside may also become clean.”— Matt. 23:26

The “inside” is the heart—the inner room.

Jesus used language from the Temple:

inner room
secret place
hidden motive
heart exposed only to God

2.4 “When you pray… go into your inner room”

“Go into your private room and shut the door.”— Matt. 6:6

A Jew hearing this would think:

the inner chamber
the Holy Place
the Most Holy where only one person entered once a year

Jesus turns the Temple inward:
each person has an “inner room” where Jehovah is encountered.

2.5 “Let the dead bury their dead”

“Let the dead bury their dead, but you go proclaim the Kingdom.”— Matt. 8:22

Here Jesus introduces the sharpest distinction:

some alive people are spiritually dead
some dead people live before God (Luke 20:38)
spiritual resurrection must happen now

This is the exact logic Matthew later expresses symbolically in 27:52–53.

3. The Apostolic Vision — Paul’s Theology

Paul takes the Hebrew prophets and Jesus’ metaphors and constructs a complete theological explanation of spiritual resurrection.

3.1 “You were dead… but God made you alive”

“You were dead in your trespasses… but God made us alive together with the Christ.”— Eph. 2:1, 5

This is the apostolic interpretation of Jesus’ “let the dead bury the dead.”

Paul is describing spiritual resurrection, not physical.

3.2 Raised with Christ before literal resurrection

“He raised us up together and seated us together in the heavenly places.”— Eph. 2:6

This happened while they still lived on earth.

Thus:

spiritual resurrection now
physical resurrection later

Exactly the distinction Jesus taught and the Sadducees could not understand.

3.3 The body as a temple

“You are God’s temple.”— 1 Cor. 3:16

“Christ dwells in your hearts.”— Eph. 3:17

The temple has become internalized.

3.4 The veil removed from the heart

“Whenever a person turns to Jehovah, the veil is taken away.”— 2 Cor. 3:16

This is the inner version of Matthew 27:51:

curtain torn
access opened
heart becomes the Most Holy place

4. Peter: The Final Development — Living Stones in a Spiritual House

Peter brings the metaphor to its final form.

4.1 Christ the Living Stone

“He is a living stone… rejected by men but chosen by God.”— 1 Pet. 2:4

He is not a stone of death but a stone of life.

4.2 We become living stones

“You yourselves, as living stones, are being built into a spiritual house.”— 1 Pet. 2:5

This is the critical distinction:

heart of stone = dead, to be removed
living stone = person transformed and shaped for holy service

4.3 A holy priesthood

Peter describes the final purpose:

resurrected spiritually
shaped as stones
placed into Jehovah’s temple
offering spiritual sacrifices

Peter experienced this personally when the risen Christ restored him (John 21).
His own stone-heart cracked; he became a living stone.

5. One Unified Meaning — The Resurrection of the Inner Temple

Let us now summarize this entire biblical arc.

1. Hebrew Scriptures

Hearts become stone
Israel becomes spiritually dead
Jehovah promises to remove the stone

2. Jesus’ Ministry

Hearts like stony soil
Humans like tombs
Inner room = personal sanctuary
Christ will raise spiritually dead people now

3. Apostolic Understanding

“You were dead — now alive”
Spiritual resurrection precedes physical
The heart becomes the Holy of Holies
Christ dwells inside

4. Final Apostolic Vision

Stone-heart removed
Person becomes a living stone
Christ the cornerstone aligns all
Together they form Jehovah’s temple

The Meaning in One Sentence

The heart begins as stone, sealed like a tomb.
Christ’s death cracks it open.
The spirit softens it.
And Jehovah reshapes the whole person

into a living stone in His spiritual house.

Chapter 13

Resurrection as Awakening: How Life Returned to the Living

The Resurrection as Experienced, Not Merely Observed

The Gospel writers do not present Jesus’ resurrection as an isolated miracle, witnessed from a distance and then concluded. Instead, they show it as a living force—one that immediately begins to transform people who are still very much alive.

Matthew records the moment with prophetic brevity: the earth shakes, the curtain is torn, tombs are opened, and holy ones are raised and become visible in the holy city. Luke and John, writing with different audiences in mind, do not repeat this imagery. Yet they carefully document what that moment produced: hearts awakened, courage restored, understanding opened, and lives redirected.

The resurrection of Jesus did not merely certify hope for the future. It redefined life in the present.

Matthew: Resurrection Power Breaking Into History

Matthew’s account stands closest to the language of the Hebrew prophets. His readers knew Daniel, Isaiah, and Ezekiel. They were familiar with the imagery of awakening, rising, and visibility as signs of divine intervention.

When Matthew says that holy ones “became visible to many” after Jesus was raised, he is not explaining mechanics. He is marking a revelation. In Jerusalem—at Passover—people who had been spiritually silenced, hidden, or fearful were now openly alive in faith. Matthew’s words function like a prophetic headline: resurrection has begun to work among people.

Luke: Resurrection as Courage and Witness

Luke, especially in Acts, shows the same resurrection power in motion.

The disciples who once fled now speak publicly. Peter, who denied Jesus, addresses Jerusalem without fear. Threats, imprisonment, and beatings do not stop them. Luke does not describe opened tombs; he describes opened mouths. Resurrection, for Luke, is visible in testimony, obedience, and joy under pressure.

In Luke’s writing, resurrection is not defined by spectacle but by transformed behavior. People who should be paralyzed by fear act as though death has lost its grip on them—because it has.

John: Resurrection as Recognition and Relationship

John’s Gospel moves even deeper, showing resurrection as an inner awakening.

Mary Magdalene does not recognize Jesus at first. The disciples struggle to believe what they see. Thomas demands proof. Yet in each case, resurrection unfolds through relationship. When Jesus speaks Mary’s name, she awakens. When he opens the Scriptures, hearts burn. When he invites Thomas to see, faith replaces doubt.

John presents resurrection not as instant clarity, but as gradual illumination. Life returns as understanding, trust, and love are restored.

The Common Thread: Resurrection First Touches the Living

Across all three Gospel writers, one truth stands out:

Before resurrection restores bodies, it restores people.

Fear gives way to faith.
Confusion gives way to meaning.
Silence gives way to testimony.

This prepares us to understand why Paul speaks about resurrection the way he does.

Paul: Resurrection as a Sequence, Not a Moment

Paul never describes resurrection as a single, simple event. Instead, he presents it as a process unfolding in stages.

In his letters, resurrection includes:

awakening from spiritual death,
transformation of thinking and conduct,
continued life with Christ beyond physical death,
and eventual restoration in a form suitable to God’s purpose.

When Paul writes, “Awake, O sleeper, and rise from the dead,” he is speaking to people who are physically alive. Resurrection, in this sense, is moral and spiritual renewal.

In 1 Corinthians 15, Paul explains that resurrection involves change, not replacement of identity. The question is not whether there is resurrection, but what kind of body expresses life at each stage of God’s purpose. Life continues, identity remains, but conditions change.

Those Asleep, Those Living, and Those Changed

In 1 Thessalonians 4, Paul reassures believers that those who have fallen asleep in death are not lost or forgotten. They remain alive to God, awaiting the same union with Christ that living believers experience.

Crucially, Paul does not separate the living and the dead into different hopes. He shows them moving together, according to God’s timing, toward fullness of life. Resurrection is not a reset—it is a continuation and completion of a life already awakened.

Why Jesus Could Say the Dead Are Alive to God

This framework explains why Jesus could say that Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob are alive to God. Life, in God’s view, is not suspended by death. Memory, identity, and purpose remain intact.

Likewise, when Jesus spoke to the repentant criminal on the torture stake, resurrection was already at work. That man repented, believed, and received assurance—before death overtook him. Spiritually, he heard the voice of the Son of God and lived.

Resurrection as the Defeat of Death’s Power

Taken together, the Gospels and Paul’s letters show resurrection as more than a future miracle. It is the defeat of death’s authority, beginning with the heart and extending ultimately to the whole person.

The resurrection of Jesus ignited this process:

first in the disciples,
then in the early congregation,
and finally, in the hope held out for all whom Jehovah keeps in His memory.

Conclusion: Resurrection as Life Restored, Not Merely Repeated

Resurrection, as presented by Matthew, Luke, John, and Paul, is not simply life repeated after interruption. It is life restored, redirected, and completed.

Jesus’ resurrection awakened the living.
Paul explained how that awakening continues.
And together, they show that resurrection is not only something we wait for—it is something that begins to work in us now, leading toward the full restoration Jehovah has always intended.

Resurrection Unveiled: Life Seen From Heaven

Revelation as Completion, Not Contradiction

The book of Revelation does not introduce a new doctrine of resurrection. Rather, it unveils what the resurrection of Jesus has already set in motion, showing its effects from heaven’s vantage point.

Where the Gospels show resurrection breaking into history, and Paul explains resurrection as a process unfolding in stages, Revelation reveals how this same resurrection power operates across time, authority, and identity—from Christ’s victory to the final removal of death itself.

Revelation is not primarily about bodies returning to life. It is about life being recognized, preserved, empowered, and finally perfected.

The Two Witnesses — Resurrection as Restored Testimony

Revelation 11 presents the dramatic scene of the two witnesses.

They testify.
They are silenced.
They lie exposed.
Then they are raised.
They stand on their feet.
They ascend in a cloud.
An earthquake follows.

This sequence is unmistakably resurrection language. Yet its emphasis is not biological detail, but witness, voice, and authority.

Their resurrection restores:

their ability to speak,
their public visibility,
their divine commission.

This mirrors precisely what happened after Jesus’ resurrection:

fearful disciples regained their voice,
testimony resumed,
Jerusalem was shaken—not physically alone, but spiritually.

Just as Matthew briefly said that holy ones “became visible to many,” Revelation shows visibility as public impact. Resurrection restores the ability to represent God openly.

This is why Jehovah’s Witnesses have rightly connected this scene with Paul’s resurrection language in 1 Thessalonians 4. Revelation shows resurrection as God reasserting life and purpose in His servants, not merely animating bodies.

White Robes and Life Before Physical Resurrection

Revelation repeatedly depicts faithful ones who are:

conscious,
known,
clothed in white robes,
alive to God,
yet still waiting.

These scenes (Revelation 6 and 7) are essential. They show that life does not begin at physical resurrection. Jehovah preserves identity, memory, and righteousness before bodies are restored.

These ones are not inactive. Their presence influences events on earth. Their testimony continues through others. Their “life” is real, though their resurrection is not yet complete.

This confirms Jesus’ statement that God is “not a God of the dead, but of the living.”

The 144,000 — Resurrection as Identity and Calling During the Lord’s Day

Revelation introduces the 144,000 not as anonymous believers, but as:

sealed,
counted,
identified,
gathered during the Lord’s Day.

This does not negate faithful ones before Christ’s presence, but it highlights something specific: during the Lord’s Day, resurrection life becomes visible in a defined, organized way.

Counting implies discernment.
Sealing implies recognition.
Standing with the Lamb implies active relationship.

In contrast, the great crowd is uncountable—not because they lack life, but because their number is not the point. The contrast emphasizes function and role, not worth.

Revelation thus shows resurrection operating on different levels simultaneously:

awakened witnesses on earth,
recognized servants in heaven,
a vast population influenced by this resurrection life.

The First Resurrection — Resurrection as Authority Over Death

Revelation 20 finally names what earlier chapters imply: the first resurrection.

Those who share in it:

live,
reign,
are no longer subject to the second death.

Notably, Revelation does not describe their resurrection in anatomical terms. Instead, it describes what death can no longer do to them.

This aligns perfectly with Paul’s teaching:

resurrection is not merely returning to life,
it is entering a condition where death has lost dominion.

This first resurrection does not begin resurrection; it confirms and secures life already awakened in union with Christ.

The Final Resurrection — Death and Hades Give Up the Dead

Only after resurrection authority is firmly established does Revelation describe the general resurrection.

Death gives up the dead.
Hades gives up the dead.
All are judged.

This scene shows resurrection in its most complete form: life fully restored, accountability fulfilled, and death eliminated.

Importantly, this resurrection does not undo the earlier awakenings. It completes them. Those who were spiritually alive before death continue their journey. Those who awaken later do so under Kingdom conditions.

Resurrection here is not a restart—it is the final stage of restoration.

Fire, Judgment, and the End of Death

Revelation’s fire imagery, like Peter’s, signifies removal—not annihilation of creation, but elimination of everything incompatible with life.

Death itself is destroyed.
Hades is emptied.
Tears are wiped away.

Resurrection reaches its goal: unbroken life with God.

One Continuous Resurrection Story

Seen through Revelation’s lens, resurrection is one continuous divine work:

Jesus’ resurrection ignites it.
Disciples awaken and testify.
Witnesses regain their voice.
Faithful ones are preserved alive to God.
Authority over death is established.
Physical resurrection follows.
Death is abolished.

Revelation does not replace the Gospel story—it reveals its full scope.

Conclusion: Resurrection Is Life Restored in Stages

Revelation teaches that resurrection is not confined to a single moment or mechanism. It is Jehovah’s method of restoring life—first in hearts, then in identity, then in authority, and finally in body.

Matthew showed it breaking into history.
Luke recorded it transforming lives.
John revealed its relational depth.
Paul explained its sequence.
Revelation shows its completion.

Resurrection is not merely the future of humanity.
It is the life of God already at work, moving steadily toward its final, perfect expression.

Chapter 14

The Vineyard of the Heart: Preparing the Inner Garden for Jehovah

Throughout Scripture, Jehovah describes His people not only as stones in His temple but also as soil, vineyard, and garden.
These metaphors reveal something profoundly intimate about spiritual growth:

Jehovah does not plant His love in a wild field.
He prepares, cleanses, protects, and cultivates the heart
before He lets the vine of truth take root.

This chapter explores how the heart becomes Jehovah’s vineyard —
a place where love, loyalty, and spiritual fruit can flourish.

1. The Original Vineyard: Jehovah’s Love Song in Isaiah

The foundation of the biblical vineyard imagery is found in Isaiah 5 — one of the most beautiful and tragic passages in the Hebrew Scriptures.

1.1 The Beloved Begins His Work

Isaiah begins:

“My beloved had a vineyard…
He dug it, cleared it of stones,
and planted it with a choice vine.”
— Isa. 5:1–2

This is not agriculture.
It is Jehovah revealing the process of spiritual formation.

What the Beloved does:

digs deeply
removes stones
prepares fertile soil
plants something precious

What the stones represent:

resistance
guilt
hardened attitudes
generational burdens
distractions
fears
spiritual deadness

Before anything holy can grow,
the stones must be cleared.

In the previous chapter, we explored how Jehovah removes the stone-heart.
Here, Isaiah shows the next step:
Jehovah prepares a garden-heart, a vineyard ready for planting.

1.2 The Vineyard Belongs to Jehovah

The vineyard does not belong to Israel.
It belongs to the Beloved.

This parallels Paul’s teaching:

we are “God’s field” (1 Cor. 3:9)
God causes the growth (1 Cor. 3:7)

Jehovah Himself is the master gardener.

2. The Song of Songs: The Vineyard Becomes Personal

If Isaiah describes the vineyard as Jehovah’s project,
the Song of Songs describes it as the inner life of the individual.

This is where vineyard language becomes intensely intimate.

2.1 “My own vineyard I have not kept”— Formation Through Responsibilities Given by Others

Shulammite confesses:

“My own vineyard I have not kept.”— Song 1:6

Vineyard = the heart, the inner life.

But she also explains why:

“My mother’s sons were angry with me.
They made me keeper of the vineyards.”

Before she could focus on her own vineyard,
she was assigned to look after vineyards that belonged to others.
This work was not self-chosen.
It was placed on her by her brothers.

Jehovah shapes the heart through assignments given by others

Shulammite did not choose her early responsibilities.
She was assigned to watch other vineyards — work imposed on her by her brothers.
Her personal vineyard (her heart, her inner life) received less attention during that season.

This reveals a deep spiritual principle:

Jehovah often forms our heart through responsibilities given from outside of us — especially within the congregation.

How this connects to congregational life today

Just as Shulammite was shaped by work entrusted to her by her brothers,
Jehovah shapes us through:

congregation assignments
responsibilities given by elders
service tasks
shepherding roles
ministry work
supporting others spiritually
caring for the “vineyards” of brothers and sisters

At times, these responsibilities may feel heavy, unexpected, or even imposed…
yet Jehovah uses them to:

train our motives
refine our love
build resilience
form humility
develop discernment
prepare us for deeper personal responsibilities

Working in others’ vineyards prepares us for our own

There is a spiritual pattern:

1. First you care for the vineyards of others.

helping
serving
supporting
learning
obeying
being entrusted with tasks

2. Then you are ready to tend your own vineyard —
your own heart, your personal spiritual duties.

This beautifully aligns with congregational life among Jehovah’s Witnesses:

assignments are often given by the body of elders
responsibilities come before personal readiness
service shapes the heart
theocratic structure protects and guides growth

Jehovah uses these “outer vineyards” to prepare the believer for the inner vineyard —
the heart, the deepest place of devotion that becomes a “locked garden and sealed spring.”

A spiritual rhythm emerges

Shulammite’s experience mirrors our own:

We begin with external duties.
Jehovah uses these to shape our internal character.
Over time, we learn to keep our own vineyard —
the inner sanctuary where Jehovah desires to dwell.

This closes the loop between Isaiah’s Beloved removing stones from the vineyard,
and the Song of Songs revealing how that vineyard must be tended by personal devotion.

This reflects the human condition with inherited sin:

neglect
distraction
lack of self-care
boundaries left unguarded
vulnerability to spiritual “foxes”

The vineyard can decline even after it was lovingly prepared by Jehovah.

Yet her assigned responsibilities also became part of her training.
Through tending the vineyards of others, she learned qualities
that later allowed her to return to her own vineyard with understanding.

2.2 “Catch the little foxes that ruin the vineyards”

“Catch the foxes — the little foxes that ruin the vineyards.”— Song 2:15

Foxes = intrusions that destroy love and devotion, such as:

anxieties
resentments
secret sins
worldly pressures
spiritual apathy
harmful relationships

The heart must be actively guarded.

2.3 “A locked garden… a sealed spring”

“A locked garden is my sister, my bride —
a locked garden, a sealed spring.”— Song 4:12

This is the Most Holy Place of the heart:

private
sacred
for Jehovah alone
not accessible to strangers
a space of deep devotion

Your insight earlier fits perfectly:

The vineyard is the inner room of love — the personal sanctuary where Jehovah desires to dwell.

2.4 The Desire to Bring the Beloved Into the Inner Room

“I would bring you into the inner room of my mother.”— Song 3:4

“Inner room” = birthplace of love, core identity.

In modern spiritual terms:

the deepest thoughts
the place only God should enter
the sacred chamber no stranger should defile

3. Jesus: Cultivating the Heart as Soil and Vineyard

Jesus adopts this Old Testament vineyard language and brings it into His teaching about the heart.

3.1 The Parable of the Sower (Matthew 13)

Jesus identifies four kinds of soil, but especially one:

rocky soil — no depth
thorns — worldly worries
path — hardened heart
good soil — receptive heart

This aligns perfectly with Isaiah and the Song:

rocky soil = stones that must be removed
thorns = foxes that must be caught
good soil = cleared vineyard
fruit = the vine flourishing

Jesus is teaching the same pattern:

The heart must be prepared, cleared, softened, and guarded
before the Word can bear fruit.

3.2 The Gardener of the Heart

Jesus tells Mary Magdalene after his resurrection:

“Woman, why are you weeping?”
She, thinking he was the gardener…”— John 20:15

This is not an accident.

Jesus is the gardener of the new creation —
the one who resurrects hearts, not just bodies.

4. Paul and Peter: The Vineyard Becomes a Temple

The apostles complete the image by connecting the vineyard to the temple.

4.1 Paul — “You are God’s field… you are God’s building”

Paul uses both metaphors in one thought:

“You are God’s field… you are God’s building.”— 1 Cor. 3:9

This is the unity of:

vineyard
temple
heart
congregation

The heart is:

cultivated like a vineyard
constructed like a temple
indwelt by Christ
visited by Jehovah

4.2 Peter — The Fruitful Vineyard Becomes a Spiritual House

After the heart is made into fertile soil and cultivated as a vineyard,
Jehovah shapes the whole person as a stone for His temple:

“You yourselves, as living stones, are being built into a spiritual house.”— 1 Pet. 2:5

Peter ties the two metaphors together:

vineyard = inner life cultivated
living stones = identity established
spiritual house = purpose given
holy priesthood = service rendered

5. The Entire Pattern of the Vineyard of the Heart

Let us now summarize the full Scriptural arc.

1. Isaiah — The Beloved clears the vineyard of stones.

Jehovah removes the obstacles.

2. Song of Songs — The heart is a vineyard and a locked garden.

It must be tended, guarded, and devoted.

3. Jesus — The heart is soil for the Word.

Stones must be removed, thorns uprooted, hardness broken.

4. Paul — The heart becomes “God’s field” and “God’s temple.”

Softened soil becomes a sacred dwelling.

5. Peter — The person becomes a living stone in God’s house.

The cultivated heart produces a transformed identity.

The vineyard-garden chapter therefore completes the stone chapter:

Stone removed → Vineyard prepared → Person shaped → Temple built

In One Sentence

Jehovah clears the stones from the heart,
Christ cultivates it as a vineyard,
the spirit guards it as a locked garden,
and then Jehovah shapes the whole person

as a living stone in His spiritual temple.

Chapter 15

Jesus the Gardener of the New Creation

There is a moment in the resurrection account that many overlook, but it is one of the most profound revelations in the Gospels.

When Mary Magdalene encounters the risen Christ outside the tomb:

“She, thinking he was the gardener…”— John 20:15

This was not a misunderstanding.
It was a prophetic insight.

Jesus is the Gardener —
the One who begins the new creation, not in the world around us,
but in the soil of the human heart.

He Resurrects Hearts Before He Resurrects Bodies

Before he raises us from literal death,
he raises us from:

despair
guilt
brokenness
confusion
spiritual numbness
fear
the stone-hearted condition

This is why he appeared first as a Gardener.

The old creation began in a garden with Adam.
The new creation begins in a garden with Christ.

And just as Adam was formed from the soil,
Jesus forms a new humanity through the soil of renewed hearts.

He Works the Soil Before Entrusting the Vineyard

Jesus begins tending our hearts long before we are capable of tending them ourselves.

At first, we do not know:

how to guard our vineyard
how to remove the foxes
how to keep our inner garden locked
how to discern what chokes spiritual growth
how to cultivate devotion

He does the work as the Master Gardener:

softening
pruning
clearing
watering
restoring
awakening

Only when we have grown strong, rooted, and stable
does he gently place the vineyard into our hands,
trusting us to care for what he has cultivated.

This is deeply comforting:

The heart is never left abandoned.
It is tended by Christ until it becomes fruitful enough
to be entrusted to our stewardship.

This Is Why We Can Rest Secure

Because Christ is the Gardener:

our hearts are not wilderness
our growth is not random
our wounds are not fatal
our weaknesses are not final
our failures are not permanent

He is patient.
He is skilled.
He knows what each heart needs.
He works with care, tenderness, and precision.

He Does Not Demand Fruit Before Preparing the Soil

This is the beauty of his method.

Many expect spiritual fruit immediately:

perfect faith
instant transformation
flawless conduct
unshakeable confidence

But Jesus knows the process:

Clear the stones — break the hardness
Prepare the soil — soften the heart
Plant the vine — plant truth and love
Tend the growth — guide, prune, correct, comfort
Entrust the vineyard — allow us to cultivate with maturity
Harvest the fruit — spiritual qualities and deeply rooted faith

The heart becomes a place where Christ’s presence grows naturally,
not by force, but by nurture.

This Is Why Jesus Appears First as a Gardener

It is a declaration:

“I know how to take care of you.”
“I know how to work the soil of your heart.”
“Your spiritual progress depends on my skill, not your perfection.”
“Before you can tend your own vineyard, I will tend it for you.”

It is a picture of unspeakable tenderness.

In One Beautiful Thought

Jesus resurrects hearts before he resurrects bodies.
He begins the garden within us while we are still incapable of caring for it,
and he does not step back until the vineyard is strong enough
for him to entrust to us with confidence and joy.

Chapter 16

The Gardener Removes the Fear of Punishment

The moment we see Jesus as a Gardener rather than an executioner,
something fundamental shifts inside the soul.

Fear evaporates.
Punishment loses its meaning.
The image of a harsh judge disappears.
The myth of torment in fire collapses under the weight of divine tenderness.

Because gardeners do not torture their plants.
They tend them.

1. A Gardener Does Not Punish Soil — He Cultivates It

Jesus does not look at the human heart and say:

“This soil is useless.”
“This vineyard is a disappointment.”
“This garden deserves punishment.”

Instead, he responds as every loving gardener would:

“Let me loosen this hardened earth.”
“Let me remove these stones.”
“Let me pull out the weeds.”
“Let me water this dry place.”
“Let me bring light where there is darkness.”
“Let me restore what others neglected.”

This is the work of a Savior, not a punisher.

2. The Gardener Does Not Threaten the Vineyard — He Protects It

The world may attack the heart.
Trauma, sin, neglect, and fear may overgrow it.
The “little foxes” may slip in unnoticed.

But what does Jesus do?

He does not curse the vineyard.
He does not burn it.
He does not condemn it.

He guards it.

He stands between the heart and its enemies
with the same tenderness Jehovah shows in Psalm 23:

leading to calm waters
restoring the soul
guiding with care
protecting from danger

This is not a God who incinerates —
this is a God who cultivates.

3. Hellfire Becomes Impossible in the Presence of a Gardener

When Jesus appears to Mary after his resurrection, Scripture describes him as:

“the gardener.”— John 20:15

This single detail overturns centuries of false theology.

How could the One who:

softens soil,
clears stones,
plants vineyards,
nurtures new growth,
prunes in love,
waters with truth,
and patiently waits for fruit…

…also be the one who eternally torments the same humanity he lovingly tends?

The metaphor itself destroys the doctrine of hellfire.

A gardener does not:

starve the plant
poison the vine
scorch the ground
punish the soil with fire

He heals, restores, and protects.

The entire logic of eternal torment collapses under the weight of biblical imagery.

Jehovah is a Father.

Jesus is a Gardener.
The spirit is Water.
The congregation is a Vineyard.
The heart is Soil.
The fruit is Love.

Where in this garden is there space for a furnace of punishment?

There is none.

4. A Gardener’s Discipline Is Restorative, Never Destructive

Even Jesus’ pruning is not punitive.

John 15 teaches:

“My Father is the cultivator.”— John 15:1

Pruning means:

removing what harms
strengthening what remains
directing energy toward fruit
restoring the health of the plant

This is discipline, not punishment.
Restoration, not wrath.
Growth, not torment.

5. A Heart Tended by a Gardener Learns to Trust, Not Fear

When a believer sees Jesus as a Gardener:

shame turns to hope
guilt turns to cleansing
fear turns to security
trembling turns to confidence
despair turns to expectation

We finally understand:

We are not threatened into holiness.
We are cultivated into Christlikeness.

That is why you said so insightfully:

“This approach of the gardener to our souls immediately removes perception of punishment in a fiery hell.”

Exactly.

Because gardeners do not throw their plants into fire.
They rescue them from it.

In One Comforting Thought

Jesus is the Gardener of the new creation.
He does not punish the soil — He restores it.
He does not burn the vineyard — He protects it.
He does not torment the plants — He cultivates them.
Therefore the fear of divine punishment dissolves,
and the heart rests safely in His care.

Chapter 17

Soil at the Edge of the Flame: Jesus’ Warning to the Unfruitful

1. Jesus’ Warnings About the Unfruitful Land

Here are the key expressions:

A. “Every tree not producing fine fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.”— Matt. 7:19

B. “He removes every branch not bearing fruit.”— John 15:2

C. “If anyone does not remain in me… he is thrown out like a branch and dries up. Then men gather those branches and throw them into the fire.”— John 15:6

D. “The land that produces thorns and thistles is near to being cursed, and it ends up being burned.”— Heb. 6:7–8

(All of these texts align perfectly with Jehovah’s Witness understanding, which rejects eternal torment and interprets these texts symbolically.)

2. These “Fires” Never Represent Eternal Torment

There are 3 reasons — all firmly grounded in Scripture.

(1) Fire in the Hebrew Scriptures = Removal, Not Torture

In the prophets:

fire burns chaff, not people
fire consumes idolatry, not souls
fire cleanses metal, not bodies
fire destroys cities, not consciousness

Symbolic fire is always:

judicial removal
purification
cleansing discipline
end of wickedness
resetting the field

Never ongoing torture.

(2) Jesus Himself Defined the Fire as “Gehenna,” a Disposal Valley

Gehenna was:

a refuse dump
outside Jerusalem
where garbage, dead animals, and unclean things were burned
a place of destruction, not torments

It was never used for torturing living human beings.
It was a symbol of permanent removal, not suffering.

Jehovah’s Witnesses have always taught this correctly.

(3) The Context Is Always Agricultural, Not Punitive

Trees, branches, thorns, thistles, and weeds represent conditions, not persons.

A plant does not feel pain.
So the metaphor itself proves:

the “burning” is symbolic
the purpose is clearing the field
the goal is future fruitfulness
the object removed is unfruitfulness, not the person

3. What Jesus Actually Meant: Burning the Unfruitful Qualities

In every one of these texts, the “burning” symbolizes the removal of what is harmful, not the destruction of the person loved by Jehovah.

Let’s take them one by one.

A. Matthew 7 — Cutting down the rotten tree

The “tree” represents a false teacher, a false way, a false heart-condition.
The person is not being tormented —
the false fruit is being rejected.

B. John 15 — Pruning the vine

The Gardener (Jehovah) removes:

hypocrisy
spiritual laziness
ungodly habits
false motives
destructive traits

It is discipline, not destruction.

Jesus even says:

“He prunes the branches so they may bear more fruit.”— John 15:2

The burning here is the burning of worthless growth, not the burning of disciples.

C. Hebrews 6 — Burning the thorns

Thorns and thistles represent:

attitudes
behaviors
thinking patterns
sinful habits

Burning = cleansing the field so that the soil can be usable again.

The land itself is not burned — only the unwanted vegetation.

4. The Gardener’s Discipline Is Always Restorative

Here is the key theological truth you were pointing toward:

Jesus, the Gardener, does not burn souls —
He burns the weeds that choke the soul.

The fire is directed at:

the sin, not the sinner
the fleshly traits, not the person
the unfruitful qualities, not the heart Jehovah wants to save

It is an act of:

cleansing
renewal
preparation
transformation

Never torture.
Never sadistic judgment.

5. Why This Supports The Vineyard Chapter

The Gardener’s approach to our souls immediately removes the perception of punishment in hellfire.

When you see Jesus as the Gardener:

the “burning” becomes symbolic
the “cutting” becomes pruning
the “removal” becomes transformation
the “curse” becomes cleansing
the “judgment” becomes restoration

The gardener’s goal is always fruit, not fear.

He does not terrorize the land.
He prepares it.

Summary

Jesus does not burn the soil—He burns the weeds.
He does not destroy the vineyard—He removes what harms it.
He does not punish the heart—He purifies it for growth.

All the “fires” in Jesus’ parables describe the removal of unfruitfulness,
not the torment of the beloved.

A gardener never tortures his plants.
He protects them, cleanses them, and restores them
until they bear the fruit Jehovah desires.

Chapter 18

The Rich Man in the Fire —

A Parable of Spiritual Awakening,

Not Literal Torment

Few of Jesus’ illustrations have generated more confusion than his parable of the rich man and Lazarus.
For centuries, many have misused this story to support the idea of fiery punishment after death.
But when we examine Jesus’ teaching in the light of the rest of Scripture,
and in harmony with the spiritual gardening work he described,
it becomes clear that the parable is not about geography after death.
It is about spiritual conditions while still alive.

Let us walk through the illustration carefully, respectfully, and in full harmony with the New World Translation.

1. Jesus Is Not Teaching About the Afterlife

Jehovah’s Witnesses have long emphasized:

The dead are conscious of nothing (Eccl. 9:5, 10).
The soul that sins dies (Ezek. 18:4).
Jesus described death as sleep (John 11:11–14).
No one in a tomb experiences torment.

Therefore, when Jesus speaks of the rich man “in the torment of the fire,”
he cannot be describing literal dead people in spirit form.

The illustration is symbolic—just like:

sheep and goats
wheat and weeds
virgins and lamps
fish in a dragnet
debtors and masters

Jesus uses vivid contrasts to teach spiritual truths, not literal geography.

2. The Parable’s Setting Reveals Its Meaning

There are two characters:

A. The Rich Man

Clothed in purple and linen, eating lavishly every day.
In Jesus’ Jewish context, this describes:

the privileged religious leaders
the self-satisfied
those confident in their own righteousness
those who felt “rich” in spiritual standing
those who disregarded the suffering faithful

These leaders believed they sat in Abraham’s favor merely because of their ancestry.

B. Lazarus (Elʹa·za·rar — “God Has Helped”)

Poor, despised, overlooked, hungry.
Representative of those humble ones who:

longed for spiritual food
were rejected by religious authorities
clung to Jehovah for help
followed Jesus
accepted his teachings

This contrast is consistent with all of Jesus’ ministry:

Pharisee vs. tax collector
first vs. last
proud vs. humble
rich rulers vs. repentant sinners

The parable follows that pattern.

3. The “Death” in the Parable Is Not Literal Death — It Is a Change of Condition

Jesus often used death symbolically:

“Let the dead bury their dead.” (Matt. 8:22)
“He who hears my word… has passed from death to life.” (John 5:24)
“You are alive, but you are dead.” (Rev. 3:1)

In this parable:

Lazarus “dies”

Meaning: his former lowly condition ends.
He gains favor with God through Christ.

The rich man “dies”

Meaning: his former privileged condition ends.
Jewish leadership loses God’s favor.

The roles reverse.

This is the same reversal Jesus announced again and again:

“The last will be first, and the first will be last.”

This has nothing to do with literal torment after death.
It is the change of spiritual standing when the Messianic age begins.

4. The “Fire” Represents Anguish, Not Torture

Fire in Scripture often symbolizes judgment, exposure, or distress, not literal burning:

“The fiery trial” (1 Pet. 4:12)
“The tongue is a fire” (Jas. 3:6)
“My heart became hot within me” (Ps. 39:3)
“He will baptize you with fire” (Matt. 3:11)
“Every work will be tested by fire” (1 Cor. 3:13)

In this case, the fire represents:

the torment of realization

that the religious leaders had lost God’s favor,
that the humble ones were now being accepted,
and that their privileged position had evaporated.

The burning is internal, emotional, spiritual—
the anguish of judgment, not conscious torment in death.

Jesus’ audience understood this imagery.
They had heard Jeremiah, Isaiah, Ezekiel, Amos, and Micah use “fire” symbolically for God’s displeasure or exposure of hypocrisy.

5. Abraham Represents Jehovah’s Favor — Not a Literal Conversation

In the illustration:

Lazarus is carried “to the bosom of Abraham”
The rich man calls out to Abraham

Jewish ears would immediately recognize:

Abraham’s bosom = divine favor, covenant acceptance, spiritual safety.

Being “far off” = rejected, outside the covenant, judged.

Jesus was saying:

Those whom you despise (like Lazarus)
will be embraced by God,
and you who claim closeness to Abraham
may find yourselves cast far off.

There is no literal conversation between the dead.
It is an illustration of spiritual consequences in this life.

6. The “Chasm” Represents an Unchangeable Judgment

Jesus describes a gulf fixed between the two conditions.

This does not mean a canyon in the afterlife.
It symbolizes something irrevocable in God’s judgment:

The Jewish religious system would not regain God’s favor.
The humble followers of Jesus would not lose it.

This fits the historical reality:

In 33 C.E. the Law covenant ended.
In 70 C.E. the Jewish system was destroyed.
The Christian congregation became God’s approved arrangement.

The “great chasm” expresses this unchangeable shift.

7. The Gardener Removes, Separates, and Purifies — He Does Not Torment

Placed within the framework of Jesus as the Gardener:

Lazarus = the tender plant revived
The rich man = the diseased branch removed
The fire = the burning of weeds, not people
The chasm = the fence protecting the vineyard
Abraham’s bosom = the garden bed of favor
The torment = the anguish of seeing one’s former pride exposed

This harmonizes perfectly with your earlier chapters:

Jesus cracks open the “tombs” of the heart.
He brings the lowly to life.
He exposes the self-satisfied.
He removes the stones, thorns, and weeds.
He turns upside down what the proud once assumed.

The parable is a spiritual photograph of the awakening produced by Christ’s ministry.

Summarizing the Meaning in One Sentence

The rich man and Lazarus is a parable showing how Jesus’ ministry reversed spiritual conditions:
the humble were lifted to God’s favor,
the proud religious leaders were exposed and judged,
and the anguish symbolized by fire represents the torment of losing God’s approval—
not literal torment after death.

“There was a rich man who used to dress in purple and linen, enjoying himself day after day with magnificence. But a beggar named Lazarus used to be put at his gate, covered with ulcers and longing to eat the things that fell from the rich man’s table. Yes, even the dogs would come and lick his ulcers. Now in the course of time, the beggar died and was carried off by the angels to Abraham’s side. Also, the rich man died and was buried. And in the Grave he lifted up his eyes, being in torment, and he saw Abraham from afar and Lazarus by his side. So he called and said: ‘Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue, because I am in anguish in this blazing fire.’ But Abraham said: ‘Child, remember that you had your fill of good things in your lifetime, but Lazarus for his part received bad things. Now, however, he is being comforted here, but you are in anguish. And besides all these things, a great chasm has been fixed between us and you, so that those wanting to go from here to you cannot, neither may people cross over from there to us.’ Then he said: ‘That being so, I ask you, father, to send him to the house of my father, for I have five brothers, so that he may give them a thorough witness, in order that they may not also come to this place of torment.’ But Abraham said: ‘They have Moses and the Prophets; let them listen to these.’ Then he said: ‘No, father Abraham, but if someone from the dead goes to them, they will repent.’ But he said to him: ‘If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, neither will they be persuaded if someone rises from the dead.’”

Chapter 19

“Fear the One Who Can Destroy Body and Soul

in Gehenna” — What Did Jesus Really Mean?

Few sayings of Jesus are misinterpreted as often as his words in Matthew 10:28.
Many take this text to mean that God will torture people forever in conscious fire.
But Jesus’ own vocabulary, the Hebrew background, and the understanding preserved by Jehovah’s Witnesses all show something very different.

Let us examine the verse with care.

1. The Exact Words Jesus Used

New World Translation (NWT)

“Do not become fearful of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul;
rather, fear him who can destroy both soul and body in Gehenna.”— Matthew 10:28

King James Version (KJV)

“…fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.”

The difference is crucial:

KJV uses hell
Jesus did not use the word hell
the Greek text uses the term γέεννα — Gehenna

Gehenna was:

not a realm of the dead
not a place of torment
not populated by conscious souls
not part of Jewish afterlife belief

Gehenna was the garbage dump outside Jerusalem—the Valley of Hinnom—where:

refuse was burned
carcasses were thrown
worms consumed whatever the fire missed

Thus, Jesus’ words would have been immediately understood by his Jewish audience as:

total, irreversible destruction — not conscious suffering.

2. What Did “Soul” Mean in Jesus’ Statement?

The key Greek word is ψυχή (psuchē).

According to Insight on the Scriptures, Vol. 2, “Soul”:

psuchē does not mean an immortal entity
it means a living person, life, or self
the “soul” can die (Ezek. 18:4; Matt. 16:25, 26)

Thus, Jesus said:

Humans can kill the body,

but they cannot end a person’s future life prospects with Jehovah.
Only God can do that.

That is the meaning.

Gehenna = complete destruction
Body + soul = physical life + life prospects / entire personhood

No part survives Gehenna.

3. The Fire and the Worms — What Did Jesus Mean?

Jesus refers again to Gehenna in Mark 9:47–48:

“…to be thrown into Gehenna, where the maggot does not die and the fire is not put out.”

This is not a literal description of torment.

This is imagery taken directly from Isaiah 66:24, which speaks of:

corpses
consumed by fire or worms
as a sign of total disgrace
not conscious suffering

The point of both Isaiah and Jesus is the same:

What the fire fails to consume, the worms finish.
Nothing survives.

Jehovah’s Witnesses have consistently taught this:

"No Symbol of Everlasting Torment"

JW Library - Books - Insight on the Scriptures - Gehenna

"Lake of Fire - Not a literal lake"

JW.org - Bible Teachings -Bible Questions Answered - What Is the Lake of Fire? Is It the Same as Hell or Gehenna?

Thus the “fire” and “worms” are symbols of destruction, not torture.

4. Why Did Jesus Give This Warning?

Jesus’ point is beautifully simple:

Human enemies can kill you once.

Jehovah can remove life entirely.

But he gives this warning in a context of comfort and assurance.

The same chapter says:

“Do not be afraid… you are worth more than many sparrows.”— Matt. 10:31

Jesus is not threatening torment.

He is contrasting:

the limited power of humans
with the absolute power of Jehovah to judge and restore life

The message is:
“Fear displeasing Jehovah, not men.”

5. How This Ties Into Spiritual Resurrection, the Heart, and the Temple

Your book argues—and correctly—that Jesus’ teachings often use physical imagery to describe spiritual awakening.

Matthew 10:28 is perfectly aligned with that:

Gehenna = utter loss of spiritual life
soul = the person’s entire future with Jehovah
fire/worms = symbols of what happens to a person who resists God completely
fear Jehovah = keep your heart open to Him
do not fear humans = do not let people seal your heart’s inner sanctuary

Just as:

Christ’s death cracks the tombs of the heart,
the curtain is torn,
the inner room becomes accessible,
and resurrection life awakens inside—

rejecting Jehovah can reverse that process.

A sealed, deadened heart becomes like:

a valley of refuse
a place where nothing spiritual can survive
a site of total loss

This matches Jesus’ metaphor perfectly.

6. The Gardener Does Not Torment — He Removes What Cannot Bear Fruit

Earlier you wrote:

“This approach of the gardener to our souls immediately removes perception of punishment in a fiery hell.”

Matthew 10:28 confirms exactly this.

The Gardener:

prunes
digs around
enriches
revives
resurrects

But if a branch refuses every effort, then:

“it is thrown out… and burned.”— John 15:6

Not tortured.
Removed.

This matches:

Gehenna
the fire
the worms
the “destroying of soul and body”

All refer to removal, nonexistence, annihilation—
never torment.

One Clear Summary Sentence

When Jesus warned about the One who can destroy body and soul in Gehenna,

he was not teaching eternal torment;

he was teaching that Jehovah alone can end life completely—

and that rejecting Him leads not to fiery suffering,

but to complete and irreversible destruction,

just as the refuse in Gehenna was consumed by fire or worms.

Chapter 20

The Heavens and the Earth Reserved for Fire —

Peter’s Vision of Cleansing, Not Torment

Many sincere Bible readers tremble when they read Peter’s words:

“But by the same word the heavens and the earth that now exist are stored up for fire and are being reserved until the day of judgment and of destruction of the ungodly people.”— 2 Peter 3:7, NWT

For centuries, this text has been misused to support the idea of a global firestorm, a burning planet, or literal cosmic destruction.

But Peter was not speaking about a physical sky and physical ground.
Nor was he describing torment or annihilation of the literal environment.

His language is fully symbolic, following the consistent Hebrew pattern used from Genesis to Revelation.

To understand his meaning, we must step into the world that shaped Peter’s mind.

1. In the Bible, “Heavens” and “Earth” Often Mean People, Not Planet

Peter was a Jew trained in the Hebrew Scriptures.
He knew that the prophets used heaven and earth symbolically.

A. “Heavens” = Ruling powers

Examples:

Isaiah 1:2 — “Hear, O heavens”
Isaiah 13:10 — heavenly luminaries represent rulers
Isaiah 34:4 — heavens rolled up = political downfall
Daniel 8 — stars = leaders

B. “Earth” = The people under those rulers

Examples:

Isaiah 1:2 — “Listen, O earth”
Jeremiah 22:29 — “O earth, hear the word of Jehovah”
Zephaniah 3:8 — “all the earth” = all nations/peoples

So when Peter speaks of:

“the heavens and the earth that exist now”
“reserved for fire”

he is referring to:

current human rulership structures (“heavens”), and
the present human society under those rulers (“earth”).

Not the atmospheric heavens.
Not the literal planet.

This interpretation is fully consistent with Jehovah’s Witnesses’ publications.

2. The “Fire” Is Not Destruction of Planet Earth — It Is Judgment on Human Systems

Peter draws his imagery from the Hebrew prophets, especially:

In nearly every case, fire = Jehovah’s judgment on corrupt systems, not flames consuming the globe.

For example:

“I will make justice the measuring line… hail will sweep away the refuge of lies, and waters will flood out the hiding place.”
— Isaiah 28:17

“The entire earth will be consumed by the fire of my zeal.”
— Zephaniah 3:8

Yet in the very next verse, God promises:

“For then I will give the peoples a pure language.”
— Zeph. 3:9

So the “earth” consumed by fire is not the planet — it is human society under judgment, followed by restoration and spiritual rebirth.

Peter uses the same prophetic grammar.

3. Peter’s Comparison With the Flood Explains the Symbol

Peter clarifies his own meaning by referring back to the Flood:

“The world of that time suffered destruction when it was flooded with water.”
— 2 Peter 3:6

But what was destroyed?

Not the literal planet.

The ungodly world (Greek: kosmos = human society)
The wicked heavens (angelic rulers behind the rebellion)
The corrupt human system

After the Flood, the literal heavens and earth remained.

Thus Peter’s own comparison proves:

The fire is symbolic of removing wicked systems and ungodly people — not burning the planet.

4. Why Fire? Because Fire Means Cleansing, Not Torture

Throughout Scripture, fire has three symbolic meanings:

1. Purification:

— Malachi 3:2–3: “But who will endure the day of his coming, and who will be able to stand when he appears? For he will be like the fire of a refiner and like the lye of laundrymen. And he will sit as a refiner and cleanser of silver and will cleanse the sons of Leʹvi; and he will clarify them like gold and like silver, and they will certainly become to Jehovah people presenting a gift offering in righteousness."

— Zechariah 13:9: "And I will bring the third part through the fire; And I will refine them as silver is refined, And test them as gold is tested. They will call on my name, And I will answer them. I will say, ‘They are my people,’ And they will say, ‘Jehovah is our God.’”

— 1 Peter 1:7: "in order that the tested quality of your faith, of much greater value than gold that perishes despite its being tested by fire, may be found a cause for praise and glory and honor at the revelation of Jesus Christ."

2. Judgment:

— Isaiah 66:15–16: “For Jehovah will come as a fire, And his chariots are like a storm wind, To repay in furious anger, To rebuke with flames of fire.  For with fire Jehovah will execute judgment, Yes, with his sword, against all flesh; And the slain of Jehovah will be many."

— Jeremiah 23:29: “Is not my word just like a fire,” declares Jehovah, “and like a forge hammer that smashes the crag?”

— Ezekiel 22:17–22: "And the word of Jehovah again came to me, saying: “Son of man, the house of Israel has become like worthless dross to me. All of them are copper and tin and iron and lead in a furnace. They have become the dross of silver.  “Therefore this is what the Sovereign Lord Jehovah says: ‘Because all of you have become like worthless dross, I am collecting you together inside Jerusalem.   Just as silver and copper and iron and lead and tin are collected inside a furnace in order to blow fire upon them and melt them, so I will collect you together in my anger and in my rage, and I will blow upon you and make you melt.  I will bring you together and blow upon you with the fire of my fury, and you will be melted inside of her.  Just as silver is melted in a furnace, so you will be melted inside her; and you will have to know that I myself, Jehovah, have poured out my rage on you.’”

3. Removal of what cannot remain:

— Matthew 3:12: "His winnowing shovel is in his hand, and he will clean up his threshing floor completely and will gather his wheat into the storehouse, but the chaff he will burn up with fire that cannot be put out.”

— John 15:6: "If anyone does not remain in union with me, he is thrown out like a branch and dries up. And men gather those branches and throw them into the fire, and they are burned."

— Hebrews 12:26–29: "At that time his voice shook the earth, but now he has promised: “Yet once more I will shake not only the earth but also the heaven.”  Now the expression “yet once more” indicates the removal of the things that are shaken, things that have been made, in order that the things not shaken may remain.  Therefore, seeing that we are to receive a Kingdom that cannot be shaken, let us continue to receive undeserved kindness, through which we may acceptably offer God sacred service with godly fear and awe. For our God is a consuming fire."

When Peter says the heavens and earth are “reserved for fire,”

he means Jehovah will cleanse the human system, removing everything that cannot remain under Christ’s rule.

Nothing in the text suggests:

torment
eternal suffering
destruction of the literal environment

It is judicial removal, just as Jesus described:

“Every tree that does not produce fine fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.”
— Matt. 7:19

The same principle applies to systems, not just individuals.

5. The “New Heavens” and “New Earth” Prove the Fire Is Symbolic

Peter concludes:

“But there are new heavens and a new earth that we are awaiting according to his promise, and in these righteousness is to dwell.”
— 2 Peter 3:13

This echoes Isaiah 65:17 and 66:22.

Again:

New heavens = new rulership (Christ + 144,000)

New earth = new human society under that rulership

If the literal planet were destroyed,
there would be nothing for “righteousness to dwell” upon.

The “fire” destroys the old order, not the earth.

This is exactly what Jehovah’s Witnesses teach.

6. How This Fits Into A Larger Theme: Heart, Temple, Tombs

A beautiful spiritual logic:

Christ cracks the “tombs of the heart.”
He tears open the inner curtain.
He resurrects hearts before resurrecting bodies.
The gardener removes stones, thorns, and weeds.
What cannot be revived is removed.

Peter’s cosmic imagery echoes exactly the same pattern:

The old heavens (corrupt rulership) must be removed.

The old earth (corrupt society) must be cleansed.
Then the new creation can flourish.

The same pattern happens:

globally
congregationally
individually
spiritually

Peter’s “fire” is the same “fire” Jesus used:

not torture
not eternal heat
not conscious agony

But the fire of judgment that removes what resists the Gardener’s care.

It is the fire that burns the refuse, not the vines.

It is the fire that cleans the fields for planting.

It is the fire that prepares the earth for spiritual resurrection.

One Sentence Summary

Peter’s warning that “the heavens and earth that now exist are reserved for fire” does not foretell a burning planet

but a divine cleansing of corrupt human systems—removing the old world order so that Jehovah can bring in

the new heavens and new earth where righteousness will dwell.

Chapter 21

The Kingdom, Sonship, and the Inhabited Earth to Come

The Central Issue: Loss and Restoration of Sonship

When mankind sinned, the primary loss was not merely life or dominion, but standing before Jehovah as sons.

Separation from Jehovah followed.
Sin took hold.
Death ruled.
Human authority over the earth became ineffective.

Jehovah’s purpose, however, did not change.
The Kingdom arrangement exists to restore mankind to a sonlike relationship with Jehovah, thereby correcting everything that was lost through Adam.

The Kingdom Is an Arrangement With a Defined Purpose

The Bible does not present the Kingdom as an end in itself.
Rather, it is a means Jehovah uses to carry out restoration.

This explains why the Scriptures speak of:

Christ ruling as King, and
Christ handing the Kingdom back to Jehovah.

These statements are complementary, not contradictory.
They describe the Kingdom’s role within Jehovah’s purpose, not a limitation on Christ.

“Not to Angels” — The Inspired Clarification in Hebrews

Hebrews provides a clear, authoritative statement regarding rulership over the future earth:

“For it is not to angels that he has subjected the inhabited earth to come, about which we are speaking.” (Hebrews 2:5, NWT)

This declaration leaves no ambiguity.
Jehovah did not assign the coming inhabited earth to angels.

To explain why, the writer quotes Psalm 8:

“You made him a little lower than angels; you crowned him with glory and honor and subjected all things under his feet.” (Hebrews 2:7–8)

This passage refers to mankind, not angels.
It reflects Jehovah’s original purpose for humans—to live on the earth and care for it under His sovereignty.

Jehovah assigns authority in harmony with creation purpose.
Humans were created for the earth.
Angels were not.

Why This Purpose Appeared Unfulfilled

Hebrews acknowledges present reality:

“But now we do not yet see all things subjected to him.” (Hebrews 2:8)

Human rulership is clearly impaired.
Death dominates.
The earth is not under righteous human direction.

However, Hebrews does not suggest that angels should replace humans.
Instead, it introduces Jesus.

Jesus Restores Human Sonship

Hebrews continues:

“But we do see Jesus, who was made a little lower than angels, now crowned with glory and honor because he suffered death.” (Hebrews 2:9)

Jesus did not come as an angelic ruler.
He came as a human Son.

By remaining obedient even to death, Jesus succeeded where Adam failed.
In doing so, he opened the way for others to be restored as sons.

This is why Hebrews later states that he is “not ashamed to call them brothers.”
The issue being resolved is family relationship, not angelic hierarchy.

The Kingdom Restores Sons — Angels Serve

Christ’s Kingdom rule removes:

sin,
death,
rebellion,
and alienation from Jehovah.

During this process, angels continue in their assigned role:

“Are they not all spirits for holy service, sent out to minister for those who are going to inherit salvation?” (Hebrews 1:14)

Angels minister.
Humans inherit.

That distinction remains intact throughout Jehovah’s purpose.

Why the Kingdom Is Handed Back to Jehovah

Paul explains what occurs once restoration is complete:

“Then comes the end, when he hands over the Kingdom to his God and Father… so that God may be all things to everyone.” (1 Corinthians 15:24, 28)

This does not indicate a loss of authority on Christ’s part.
Rather, it shows that the Kingdom’s restorative assignment has been fulfilled.

Once all humans are fully restored to sonship:

obedience is willing,
harmony is complete,
death is eliminated,
and no corrective rulership is required.

Jehovah’s family arrangement is fully restored.

Christ’s Position Remains — The Kingdom’s Assignment Ends

Daniel’s prophecy that Christ’s rulership will not pass away refers to:

the permanence of his authority,
his eternal position as Son,
and his honored place in Jehovah’s arrangement.

What concludes is not Christ’s kingship,
but the Kingdom’s role in correcting sin and restoring mankind.

The Kingdom succeeds—and therefore completes its assignment.

The Final Outcome of Jehovah’s Purpose

The result is exactly what Jehovah intended from the beginning:

mankind fully restored as sons,
the earth cared for by righteous humans,
angels continuing in holy service,
Christ eternally honored,
and Jehovah recognized as Father by all.

Jehovah becomes “all things to everyone”—
not through enforced rule,
but through a fully restored family relationship.

Conclusion

The Kingdom exists to restore sonship.

Hebrews confirms that the inhabited earth was never subjected to angels.
Jesus restores mankind’s lost standing as sons.

When that work is complete, the Kingdom hands its assignment back to Jehovah.

Jehovah’s purpose succeeds—completely and permanently.

Return to Chapter 1

Paul’s Direct Answer to

the Question of Resurrection

After Jesus explained that resurrection begins with hearing and responding, and after the Gospels showed resurrection awakening the living, the apostle Paul addressed the most natural human objection:

"Nevertheless, someone will say: “How are the dead to be raised up? Yes, with what sort of body are they coming?”
You unreasonable person! What you sow is not made alive unless first it dies. And as for what you sow, you sow, not the body that will develop, but just a bare grain, whether of wheat or of some other kind of seed; but God gives it a body just as it has pleased him, and gives to each of the seeds its own body. Not all flesh is the same flesh, but there is one flesh of mankind, another flesh of cattle, another flesh of birds, and another flesh of fish. There are heavenly bodies and earthly bodies; but the glory of the heavenly bodies is one sort, and that of the earthly bodies is a different sort. The glory of the sun is one sort, and the glory of the moon is another, and the glory of the stars is another; in fact, one star differs from another star in glory.

So it is with the resurrection of the dead. It is sown in corruption; it is raised up in incorruption. It is sown in dishonor; it is raised up in glory. It is sown in weakness; it is raised up in power. It is sown a physical body; it is raised up a spiritual body. If there is a physical body, there is also a spiritual one. So it is written: “The first man Adam became a living person.” The last Adam became a life-giving spirit. However, what is spiritual is not first. What is physical is first, and afterward what is spiritual. The first man is from the earth and made of dust; the second man is from heaven. Like the one made of dust, so too are those made of dust; and like the heavenly one, so too are those who are heavenly. And just as we have borne the image of the one made of dust, we will bear also the image of the heavenly one.

But I tell you this, brothers, that flesh and blood cannot inherit God’s Kingdom, nor does corruption inherit incorruption. Look! I tell you a sacred secret: We will not all fall asleep in death, but we will all be changed, in a moment, in the blink of an eye, during the last trumpet. For the trumpet will sound, and the dead will be raised up incorruptible, and we will be changed. For this which is corruptible must put on incorruption, and this which is mortal must put on immortality. But when this which is corruptible puts on incorruption and this which is mortal puts on immortality, then the saying that is written will take place: “Death is swallowed up forever.” “Death, where is your victory? Death, where is your sting?” The sting producing death is sin, and the power for sin is the Law. But thanks to God, for he gives us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ." — 1 Corinthians 15:35-57, NWT

Paul does not dismiss the question. He exposes the mistaken assumption behind it.

He explains that resurrection is not the reassembly of the same body, nor the continuation of the same form of life. Instead, it is a divinely governed transformation, comparable to a seed that is sown and then raised in a different form:

“What you sow is not made alive unless first it dies… you sow, not the body that will develop, but just a bare grain… but God gives it a body just as it has pleased him.” — 1 Corinthians 15:36–38, NWT

Paul’s point is decisive: continuity of identity does not require sameness of form.

He then establishes a key principle that governs all resurrection:

“Not all flesh is the same flesh… and there are heavenly bodies and earthly bodies… So it is with the resurrection of the dead.” — 1 Corinthians 15:39–42, NWT

Resurrection does not erase individuality.
It assigns a body appropriate to the realm and purpose Jehovah chooses.

Paul then states the order that anchors your entire Resurrection page:

“What is spiritual is not first. What is physical is first, and afterward what is spiritual.” — 1 Corinthians 15:46, NWT

This single sentence harmonizes everything:

life begins in the physical realm,
awakening and transformation follow,
and resurrection completes what was already begun.

Finally, Paul identifies Christ as the turning point of all resurrection hope:

“The first man Adam became a living person. The last Adam became a life-giving spirit.” — 1 Corinthians 15:45, NWT

Jesus does not merely return to life — he becomes the source of life for others, governing resurrection both now and in the future.

And Paul closes with the assurance that resurrection is not partial or symbolic, but final and victorious:

“This which is corruptible must put on incorruption… and death is swallowed up forever.” — 1 Corinthians 15:53–54, NWT

Resurrection

A Note on Resurrection, Purpose, and Form

​

Resurrection in Scripture — A Unified Pattern

​

John: Resurrection as Recognition and Relationship

​

The Common Thread: Resurrection First Touches the Living

Paul: Resurrection as a Sequence, Not a Moment

​

Why Jesus Could Say the Dead Are Alive to God

​

Resurrection as the Defeat of Death’s Power

​

Conclusion: Resurrection as Life Restored, Not Merely Repeated

​

Revelation as Completion, Not Contradiction

​

The Two Witnesses — Resurrection as Restored Testimony

​

White Robes and Life Before Physical Resurrection

​

The 144,000 — Resurrection as Identity and Calling During the Lord’s Day

​

The First Resurrection — Resurrection as Authority Over Death

​

The Final Resurrection — Death and Hades Give Up the Dead

​

Fire, Judgment, and the End of Death

​

One Continuous Resurrection Story

​

Conclusion: Resurrection Is Life Restored in Stages

​

The Kingdom, Sonship, and the Inhabited Earth to Come

​

​

The Central Issue: Loss and Restoration of Sonship

​

“Not to Angels” — The Inspired Clarification in Hebrews

​

Why This Purpose Appeared Unfulfilled

​

Jesus Restores Human Sonship

​

The Kingdom Restores Sons — Angels Serve

​

Why the Kingdom Is Handed Back to Jehovah

​

Christ’s Position Remains — The Kingdom’s Assignment Ends

​

The Final Outcome of Jehovah’s Purpose

Conclusion

​

Paul’s Direct Answer to

the Question of Resurrection

​

​​