One Will Be Taken,
The other Abondoned

When Jehovah instructed Moses to gather seventy older men of Israel and bring them up the mountain, He was symbolically elevating them to a higher level of perception and communion. These men were drawn out from the larger camp, stood with Moses, and were given a share of Jehovah’s spirit, enabling them to share in the weight of responsibility for leading the nation. Their ascent to the mountain signified a closer approach to Jehovah’s presence, where divine matters were revealed more clearly. This early pattern demonstrates that Jehovah often chooses certain individuals from among His people to stand nearer to Him, to perceive His purpose more clearly, and to participate more intimately in sacred service.

​

Yet, despite these privileges, the nation of Israel soon revealed unfaithfulness and spiritual instability. As a result, Jehovah temporarily established the Levitical priesthood to serve as a model for representing the nation before Him. From the entire nation, one tribe was set apart to care for the tabernacle and its sacred furnishings. Even then, entrance into the Most Holy—the symbolic place of Jehovah’s presence—was restricted to a single man, the high priest, and only once a year on Atonement Day. This arrangement made clear that direct access to Jehovah’s presence was neither indiscriminate nor universal, but governed by His holiness and by the structure He appointed. It was a temporary but prophetic shadow of something greater to come.

​

Centuries later, John’s Revelation opened a new horizon. Instead of one tribe or one man approaching Jehovah, the vision revealed spiritual Israel—144,000 in number, drawn symbolically from twelve tribes—sealed and elevated to stand with the Lamb on heavenly Mount Zion. This marks the decisive elevation of faithful humans to the highest level of communion with Jehovah. No longer is the Most Holy approached through a single representative; rather, an entire priestly body is called to share in Christ’s priesthood. When the sealing of this group is completed, John shows that the great tribulation begins, marking the close of one era and the opening of another. Just as Moses selected seventy elders, and just as the high priest alone entered the Most Holy on behalf of the people, Jehovah now gathers spiritual Israelites to serve in the heavenly realm, bringing His purpose to its climax.

​

David’s arrangement of the priesthood offers a further prophetic link. When he brought the Ark to Jerusalem, he organized the Levites into twenty-four divisions, each serving for two weeks a year. This ensured continuous, orderly worship in the tabernacle and later in the temple. This system foreshadowed the vision of the twenty-four elders in Revelation, who surround Jehovah’s throne clothed in white garments and crowned with gold. These elders represent the completed heavenly priesthood—the 144,000—organized for sacred service. Just as the Levitical priests served in shifts, the heavenly priesthood may also serve “by turn,” according to the divine arrangement already established around Jehovah’s throne. Only those sealed and perfected will participate in this service, reflecting the same spirit of order and reverence found in the ancient pattern.

​

It is also noteworthy that although the Levites were redeemed for sacred service, they continued to live among the other tribes of Israel. They were assigned cities and lands throughout the nation, and between their shifts at the tabernacle or temple, they worked their fields and managed their households like their fellow Israelites. Their lives were not lived in permanent seclusion at the sanctuary. Instead, they moved between ordinary life and holy service according to the rotation David established. This arrangement created a rhythm of life that blended daily responsibilities with sacred duties. In this way, the priestly service was distributed throughout the nation, and the Levites remained integrated with the people while still maintaining their special role. This provides a powerful model for spiritual Israel: those anointed for heavenly service likewise live and work among their fellow believers, sharing in the activities of daily life until Jehovah appoints their turn for service in the heavenly arrangement. Their sacred identity is constant, but their active participation in priestly service follows the rotational perception established in Jehovah’s pattern.

​

Jesus’ words, “One will be taken along and the other abandoned,” harmonize perfectly with this arrangement. In Israel, when priestly rotations began, only those assigned for that particular shift ascended to serve in the temple, while others remained where they were, awaiting their turn. In a similar way, among those laboring side by side, only the sealed and appointed are “taken along” into their heavenly service. The other is “abandoned,” not necessarily in rejection for life on earth, but simply not called into that priestly rotation. The selection is neither arbitrary nor sudden; it reflects Jehovah’s sovereign arrangement, in which each of the anointed takes their appointed turn before His throne. Jesus’ illustration thus reveals not only separation but also appointment into an already established heavenly system.

​

This perspective aligns with Jehovah’s consistent expectations for those who draw close to Him. Under the Law, priestly service required cleanness, physical soundness, and maturity. Men between thirty and fifty served actively, symbolizing strength and stability. No one with uncleanness or physical defect could officiate at the altar. Likewise, the anointed must reach spiritual maturity and, ultimately, be perfected through resurrection or transformation before entering their heavenly assignment. Flesh and blood cannot inherit God’s Kingdom; only those freed from sin can represent all of spiritual Israel in the holy city, New Jerusalem. Thus, “one will be taken” reflects both selection and qualification—only those who meet Jehovah’s holy standards are received into priestly service.

​

All of this collective priestly service rests upon the model of individual preparation. In Israel, many served together in the temple, but each priest was personally responsible for being clean, clothed appropriately, and dedicated. In the Christian fulfillment, the heavenly priesthood of 144,000 is a collective spiritual household, not the temple itself, but the household of priests serving within Jehovah’s vast spiritual temple, just as the Levites served within the physical sanctuary. Each member must personally become a suitable vessel for God’s spirit. Before taking their turn in priestly service, each must be “wrapped in a new tent”—a perfected spiritual body fit for heavenly service. This is the antitypical priestly garment, enabling them to approach Jehovah’s presence in purity. In this way, the collective priesthood forms a figurative temple—the household of the High Priest, Christ—serving within Jehovah’s great spiritual temple. And just as each Levite had to be individually prepared, each anointed one must become a purified “tent” for God’s spirit, ready to serve their appointed role in the holy city, New Jerusalem.

​

On October 4, 2025, I had the privilege of attending the Annual Meeting of Jehovah’s Witnesses via video conference. During the program, it was announced that Bethel service would henceforth be arranged on a rotational basis, rather than viewed as a lifetime commitment. Those invited to Bethel would know from the outset that their period of service would be temporary, after which others could have the same privilege. This adjustment is significant, not only organizationally but also symbolically. It mirrors the Levitical rotation established in David’s day, when priestly divisions took turns serving in the temple while continuing to live among the tribes. In a similar way, Bethel service reflects a spirit of order, shared participation, and rotation, ensuring that many can share in sacred service while remaining integrated with the broader congregation. This modern development underscores how Jehovah’s organization continues to reflect the patterns He established long ago, patterns that also point forward to the rotational service of the heavenly priesthood.

​

​

Lexical and Contextual Analysis of “Taken” and “Abandoned” in Matthew 24:40–41

​

In Jesus’ prophecy recorded in Matthew 24, two verbs stand at the heart of a striking illustration: παραλαμβάνω (paralambanō), rendered “taken,” and ἀφίημι (aphiēmi), rendered “abandoned.” Examining Matthew’s consistent use of these words reveals their theological weight and clarifies the dual application Jesus intended.

​

The verb παραλαμβάνω combines para (“beside”) with lambanō (“to take, receive”), and means “to take to oneself,” “receive near,” or “bring along with.” In Matthew, it typically describes intentional, personal inclusion. Joseph was told to “take Mary” into his household (1:20, 24); he later “took along the child and his mother” to Egypt under divine direction (2:13–14). Jesus “took” Peter, James, and John up the mountain of transfiguration to witness a revelation others did not see (17:1), and he “took” his disciples aside to confide details about his coming suffering (20:17). Even negative uses—such as the Devil “taking” Jesus to the temple (4:5)—still imply deliberate action. In every case, paralambanō conveys the idea of selective reception, appointment, or inclusion into something purposeful, whether protective, revelatory, or functional.

​

By contrast, the verb ἀφίημι has a wide semantic range: “to send away, release, dismiss, leave, permit, forgive.” In Matthew, it appears in benevolent contexts (forgiving sins or debts, 6:12; 9:2; 18:27) but also prominently in contexts of neglect, dismissal, or judgment. Jesus condemns the religious leaders for having “disregarded (ἀφήκατε) the weightier matters of the Law” (23:23). He later declares, “Your house is left (ἀφίεται) to you desolate” (23:38), using the term judicially of Israel’s temple. In 24:2, he foretells, “Not one stone will be left (ἀφεθῇ) upon another,” again signaling divine abandonment. He uses aphiēmi to describe dismissing the crowds (13:36), telling his listeners to “let them be” (15:14) regarding the Pharisees, and yielding up his spirit at death (27:50). The thread is consistent: Matthew often employs aphiēmi to denote letting go, dismissal, or judicial abandonment, especially in religious contexts marked by hypocrisy or neglect.

Applied to Matthew 24:40–41, this contrast is illuminating:

 

“Then two men will be in the field; one will be taken (paralambanetai), and the other abandoned (aphiētai). Two women will be grinding at the hand mill; one will be taken, and the other abandoned.”

​

The immediate context (24:37–39) recalls Noah’s day, emphasizing sudden separation amid ordinary life. Here, “taken” is best understood as deliberately received, gathered, or appointed by divine action, analogous to Noah and his family being brought into the ark. “Abandoned” reflects being left or dismissed, not in a neutral sense, but akin to how Israel’s house was “left desolate” (23:38)—a judicial “letting go,” allowing people to remain in their chosen state outside divine favor until judgment arrives.

​

Matthew’s use of these verbs elsewhere confirms this reading. Paralambanō consistently depicts purposeful inclusion—Joseph receiving Mary, Jesus taking disciples aside—while aphiēmi, especially in the later chapters, often signals dismissal associated with hypocrisy and judgment (23:23, 38; 24:2). The juxtaposition of these two terms in the same sentence underscores a decisive act of divine separation.

​

Immediately after this illustration, Jesus tells the parable of the faithful and discreet slave (24:45–51). Here, the same two dynamics reappear but within the household of faith. The faithful slave is found feeding the domestics at the proper time and is “appointed over all the master’s belongings” (24:47)—the functional equivalent of being “taken” into greater trust and service. The evil slave, complacent and abusive, is punished and “assigned his place with the hypocrites” (24:51)—the household form of being “abandoned.” This parable explains how the separation Jesus described in Noah’s terms plays out among his own people: some are appointed, others dismissed.

​

Therefore, two layers of application emerge:

1. The Noah Frame (Global):
   “Taken” refers to being gathered into divine favor and preservation before judgment; “abandoned” refers to being left outside the saving arrangement, allowed to remain until destruction arrives.

2. The Faithful-Slave Frame (Household):
   “Taken” refers to being appointed to greater trust within Christ’s household, such as participating in the heavenly priestly service; “abandoned” refers to being dismissed due to hypocrisy or neglect.

​

Both layers are consistent with Matthew’s linguistic patterns. Paralambanō conveys deliberate reception and inclusion, while aphiēmi conveys dismissal or abandonment, often judicial in tone. Together, these verbs describe the divine act of appointment and exclusion that takes place during Christ’s presence—both among mankind generally (as in Noah’s day) and within his household (as in the faithful-slave parable). This dual frame perfectly aligns with the broader themes of Matthew’s Gospel: selective reception for those faithfully responding to God’s purpose, and judicial abandonment for those who disregard or neglect their responsibilities.

​

​

Daes the context allow think about rotation in priestly service?

​

That’s a very perceptive question — and yes, while Matthew 24:40–41 doesn’t explicitly mention priestly service, the broader context of Jesus’ discourse does allow for rotation imagery, especially when you consider:

​

1. The vocabulary of “taken” (παραλαμβάνω) and “abandoned” (ἀφίημι) fits appointment vs. dismissal language within the household of faith, not just general salvation.

2. The faithful and discreet slave parable (24:45–51) immediately follows, describing appointment to responsibility within the Master’s house—a setting analogous to priestly or temple service.

3. Jesus frequently uses household/temple service language to describe his disciples’ future roles (e.g., “over all his belongings,” “faithful slave,” “feeding domestics”), which parallels priestly duty under a High Priest.

4. In the Hebrew Scriptures, priestly service was rotational (24 divisions; 1 Chronicles 24:1–19). Those not on duty lived among their fellow Israelites and awaited their turn—exactly the kind of “one appointed, one left” dynamic Jesus describes.

 

Let’s unpack this carefully:

📖 1. Immediate Context — Appointment Language

After describing “one taken and one abandoned,” Jesus transitions to the faithful and discreet slave. This parable focuses on individuals already inside the Master’s household, where some are appointed to greater service, while others are dismissed. This matches the pattern of priestly assignments under the Law:

• Levites and priests lived among their tribes most of the time.

• When their division was summoned to the sanctuary, they left their ordinary work and served in rotation.

• Those not summoned during a particular period were effectively “left” where they were, though still part of the priesthood.

This fits the paralambanō / aphiēmi contrast perfectly:

• “Taken” = summoned / appointed / received for service.

• “Abandoned” = left in place / dismissed / not summoned at this time.

​

2. Broader Eschatological Context — Heavenly Appointments

Revelation depicts the 144,000 as a priestly body serving in God’s heavenly temple (Revelation 5:9–10; 7:15; 14:1–4). This priesthood is represented by 24 elders (Revelation 4:4), clearly echoing the 24 Levitical divisions instituted by David for orderly temple service. That system was rotational: each division served two weeks per year, returning home afterward.

In Matthew 24, Jesus speaks just before his parables of talents and sheep and goats (Matthew 25), which also describe different assignments, delayed appointments, and reward when the master returns. The consistent picture is:

 

Some are appointed to serve actively; others are left in their ordinary place, awaiting judgment or a later role.

​

3. Priestly Rotation as a Thematic Fit

Although Matthew does not directly mention “rotation,” the concept of selective appointment within the household aligns naturally with the Levitical service model:

• The Levites were all consecrated, but not all were serving at the same time.

• Their turns were fixed; they were summoned, served, and then returned home.

• Service was not a permanent relocation but a rhythmic, structured rotation.

The phrase “one will be taken, one abandoned”, especially when followed by a parable of household appointment, harmonizes beautifully with that pattern.

​

4. Logical Conclusion

The immediate Noah context frames the saying globally: some are brought under protection, others left outside.
The faithful slave context applies the same language within Christ’s household: some are appointed, others dismissed.
The Levitical-priesthood model provides a historical and theological framework for understanding the manner of that appointment—rotational service within a household dedicated to God.

So while Matthew 24 doesn’t state, “the heavenly priesthood will serve in rotation,” the structure of the text and Jesus’ choice of language fully allow the rotation model to function as a theological lens. It doesn’t override the global salvation meaning but adds a household-priesthood dimension for those with eyes trained on temple imagery.

​

✅ In short:

Yes, the context allows rotation imagery—not as the explicit literal meaning of the verse, but as a harmonious theological layer that fits Matthew’s language, Jesus’ sequence of illustrations, and the priestly patterns prefiguring the heavenly arrangement.

​

✅ In long:

Although Matthew 24:40–41 does not explicitly mention priestly service, the broader context of Jesus’ discourse allows the concept of rotational appointment to function as a meaningful theological lens. The key lies in how Jesus moves seamlessly from the illustration of “one will be taken and one abandoned” to the parable of the faithful and discreet slave (Matthew 24:45–51). In doing so, he shifts from a global frame (the days of Noah) to an in-house frame, describing appointments and dismissals within his own household. This is precisely the sphere where priestly or temple imagery naturally applies.

​

Under the Mosaic Law, the Levites and priests were all consecrated to serve Jehovah, but not all served simultaneously. King David organized them into twenty-four divisions, each taking its turn to serve at the tabernacle or temple for two weeks each year, then returning home to their families (1 Chronicles 24:1–19). In between rotations, Levites lived among the other tribes, working their land and sharing ordinary daily life with their fellow Israelites. Only when their appointed turn arrived were they summoned to the sanctuary. Those not on duty were not rejected; they were simply left in their place until their rotation came.

​

This historical pattern closely resembles the contrast between “taken” (παραλαμβάνεται) and “abandoned” (ἀφίεται) in Matthew 24:40–41. The one “taken” can be understood as summoned or appointed for service, while the one “abandoned” remains in their ordinary station, dismissed or left in place for the time being. This mirrors the Levitical dynamic: one priest is called up for temple duty, while another remains at home awaiting his future turn.

Furthermore, Jesus’ description of the faithful and discreet slave reinforces this idea. The faithful slave is found feeding the domestics and is appointed over all the Master’s belongings—a phrase reminiscent of increased temple or household responsibility. The evil slave, by contrast, is dismissed and assigned a place with the hypocrites. This household parable employs appointment language that aligns naturally with priestly service, where faithfulness determines one’s role and privilege.

​

This priestly-rotation perspective also harmonizes with Revelation’s imagery of the 144,000 anointed as a royal priesthood, represented by the twenty-four elders who surround God’s throne (Revelation 4:4; 5:9–10; 7:15). Just as David’s priesthood was organized into rotations, this heavenly priesthood appears structured and orderly, with service distributed among appointed ones in harmony with divine arrangement. Those “taken” are not randomly seized, but deliberately summoned into priestly service at their appointed time, while others are “left” or “dismissed” until their turn or because of disqualification.

​

Therefore, while the immediate sense of Matthew 24:40–41 highlights sudden separation like that in Noah’s day, the context and language allow for a priestly rotation lens that applies especially to those within Christ’s household. Jesus’ use of paralambanō (“taken”) and aphiēmi (“abandoned”) fits naturally with the dynamics of appointment and dismissal in a structured priesthood. It does not replace the global salvation meaning, but rather adds a household, priestly dimension to the passage—one that aligns perfectly with the prophetic patterns Jehovah established in Israel’s worship and that are later expanded in the heavenly arrangement.

​

​​

“I Will Never Abandon You” — 2024 Watchtower Reassurance

​

In February 2024, the Watchtower study edition featured an article entitled “I Will Never Abandon You.” Drawing on the words of Hebrews 13:5—“I will never leave you, and I will never abandon you”—the article reassures Jehovah’s servants that even when the last of the anointed are taken to their heavenly assignment, those remaining on earth will not be forsaken by their God. The promise is rooted in Jehovah’s enduring loyalty, echoed in Deuteronomy 31:6 and Romans 8:38-39, and supported by prophetic texts such as Isaiah 26:20, which portrays God’s people finding refuge during critical periods.

​

This explanation is significant for understanding Jesus’ words about “one being taken and the other abandoned” (Matthew 24:40–41). The term “abandoned” (aphiētai) in Matthew carries the sense of being left or dismissed from a specific gathering or appointment, rather than permanent rejection. The Watchtower emphasizes this distinction: those who remain after others are “taken” into heavenly service are not spiritually abandoned. Jehovah’s protective care continues over them, and pure worship remains intact under his direction. This reassurance prevents misinterpretation of “abandoned” as hopeless exclusion. Instead, it affirms that those left on earth remain under divine care, awaiting the fulfillment of God’s purpose.

​

This aligns beautifully with the priestly rotation model. In ancient Israel, those not summoned for their shift were “left” among their tribes, not rejected; their turn simply had not come. Similarly, while the “taken” ones are appointed to heavenly service, the “abandoned” remain within Jehovah’s household, protected and supported, until their role in the outworking of his purpose unfolds. This modern clarification highlights Jehovah’s unwavering loyalty: even as the gathering of the anointed reaches its conclusion, he will never abandon his loyal servants on earth.

​

​

Permanent Elevation and Rotational Service: Harmonizing the Two

​

At first glance, the final sealing and heavenly resurrection of the anointed might seem to imply that once elevated, all 144,000 immediately assume the same priestly role simultaneously. Revelation indeed presents their elevation as permanent. Those who are sealed are transformed into immortal, incorruptible spirit beings and are “taken” into the heavenly Mount Zion to stand with the Lamb (Revelation 14:1). This corresponds to the moment in Revelation 11:12 when the symbolic “two witnesses” hear the voice from heaven saying, “Come up here,” and they ascend in a cloud. Their elevation is irreversible, just as the seventy elders in Moses’ day did not return to their former status after being called up the mountain. This permanent elevation marks their change of nature and realm, fulfilling 1 Corinthians 15:51–54 and Revelation 20:6—they “will be priests of God and of the Christ, and they will rule as kings with him for the 1,000 years.”

​

However, permanent elevation of status does not mean that all will serve in identical capacities at the same time. The Levitical priesthood under David’s arrangement provides an instructive model. Though all Levites were consecrated to priestly service, they served in structured rotations, divided into twenty-four groups (1 Chronicles 24:1–19). Each group had its assigned time and duties in the sanctuary, then returned home until its next turn. This ensured order, continuity, and shared participation in the sacred service.

​

Revelation echoes this structure through the vision of the twenty-four elders who surround God’s throne (Revelation 4:4; 5:8–10). These elders represent the entire heavenly priesthood but are depicted in an organized body, reminiscent of the twenty-four divisions of Israel’s priests. The heavenly temple scene is one of perfect order, not chaotic activity. Revelation 7:15 says that the great priestly body “are rendering him sacred service day and night in his temple.” This language implies a structured distribution of duties, just as in the earthly temple. Jehovah’s service—whether on earth or in heaven—has always been characterized by order and assignment, not random participation (1 Corinthians 14:33, 40).

​

Therefore, while the anointed experience permanent elevation upon sealing, their priestly service within the heavenly temple can be understood as structured and possibly rotational. All belong permanently to the priesthood, but their active participation in various priestly functions may follow a divinely arranged order. This harmonizes the idea of “one taken” with progressive appointments: some may be taken earlier, others later; all are eventually elevated permanently, but their roles within that glorified state may be distributed in an orderly fashion, reflecting Jehovah’s timeless pattern.

In this way, permanent elevation and rotational service are not contradictory but complementary. The first concerns their unchangeable status as glorified spirit beings; the second concerns their organized participation in Jehovah’s sacred service during Christ’s Kingdom rule. This distinction reflects the same principles Jehovah established in Israel’s worship and provides a coherent framework for understanding how the heavenly priesthood functions.

​

​

Man, Not Angels, to Rule the New World

​

To make it clear, the elevation to the heavens does not mean the loss of human nature. Jehovah’s purpose has never been to replace mankind with angels as the rightful administrators of the earth. The Scriptures explicitly state that “it is not to angels that he has subjected the inhabited earth to come” (Hebrews 2:5). This decisive statement sets the foundation: the future earth is not placed under angelic jurisdiction, but under the authority of man as Jehovah originally intended.

To reinforce this, Hebrews 2 quotes Psalm 8:4–6: “What is man that you keep him in mind, or a son of man that you take care of him? You made him a little lower than angels; you crowned him with glory and honor, and appointed him over the works of your hands.” This psalm describes mankind’s God-given destiny — to rule the earth as His image-bearers. Although Adam failed, Jehovah’s purpose remains unchanged. He has entrusted the restoration of this human dominion to the Son of man, Jesus Christ, who perfectly fulfilled Psalm 8 and secured that dominion through his obedience and sacrifice.

​

Those who become part of Christ’s body—the 144,000—share in his human identity, not by remaining in their imperfect earthly state, but by being clothed with a new, spiritual body patterned after the heavenly one (2 Corinthians 5:1–4; Philippians 3:20–21). Their nature is perfected, not exchanged for angelic nature. "As angels"- "ὡς as ἄγγελοι angels ἐν in τῷ the οὐρανῷ heaven εἰσίν· they are"- not the angels. (Matthew 22:30) They do not become angels; they become glorified men, the completed “body of the Christ,” permanently elevated yet still representing redeemed humanity. Their elevation equips them to serve in heavenly places, but their identity and destiny remain human, fulfilling Jehovah’s original purpose for man to rule the earth.

​

If they were to become angels, it would undermine Jehovah’s declared will. Angels were never commissioned to administer the earth. Their service is heavenly, not terrestrial. In contrast, the Son of man and those joined to him are entrusted with the earth’s administration. After their elevation, they are reconciled to God and entrusted with overseeing the restoration of humanity, functioning as the collective royal priesthood under Christ’s headship (Revelation 5:9–10; 20:6). They are “taken” into heavenly positions of trust, but this does not erase their humanity; rather, it perfects and establishes it for their Kingdom role.

​

Thus, in the new world, it is man—not angels—who governs the earth. Christ, the glorified Son of man, stands as the head, and his body—composed of the sealed anointed—is permanently elevated yet still human in nature, now perfected. Together, they administer the earth according to Jehovah’s original design, not as a replacement by another order of beings, but as the restored human family fulfilling the mandate of Psalm 8.